60 likes | 78 Views
This report provides a summary of the Layer Management (LM) Comments for the IEEE 802.17 RPRWG. It includes comments accepted, accepted-modified, rejected, and withdrawn, along with editorial and technical binding/non-binding comments.
E N D
Layer Management and MIBsSections Report IEEE 802.17 RPRWG
LM Comments summary • 14 comments • 7 editorial: Not discussed since section editor absent • 6 Technical non-binding • 1 Technical binding • 2 comments accepted • 5 accepted-modified IEEE 802.17 RPRWG
Highlights • Rename the MIB attributes in order to be consistent with other section’s abbreviations • Break the table that specifies the MIB and their description into a few tables to improve readability and clarity • Generalize the primitives between the management and the MAC MIB attributes so they will cover all private primitives that were defined in other sections. IEEE 802.17 RPRWG
Annex E Comments summary • 34 comments • 11 editorial: Not discussed since section editor absent • 21 Technical non-binding • 2 Technical binding • 7 comments accepted • 10 accepted-modified • 4 rejected • 2 withdrawn IEEE 802.17 RPRWG
Rejected Comments • #427 • Add new table. Commenter was requested to resubmit a detailed comment and proposed resolution • #40 • Change the index to Topology table. The proposed resolution doesn’t improve the table structure • #87 • MIB to support multiple ringlets. Wasn’t addressed by the group • #44 • Add a new object tote/deactivate the protection switching capability on SD. Alternatively, SD threshold can be set higher than SF. IEEE 802.17 RPRWG
Highlights • Release the MIBs to the IETF after it will be completed • Should the IEEE802.17 provide a separate ascii file of the MIB tables • Incorporate references from the MIBs description to the relevant sections in the draft • Add Total statistics tables to the MIB. OAM clause will determine optionally of the intervals vs. total statistics • MIB attributes will follow changes in the drafts IEEE 802.17 RPRWG