1 / 16

LOFAR Status

LOFAR Status. Internal review of the project (April-July 2007): Main conclusions: R&D developments in good shape (CS1 results) Development costs in line with original estimates Original 77-station LOFAR relied on significant matching from original international partners (e.g. ATNF, MIT, NRL)

karim
Download Presentation

LOFAR Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LOFAR Status • Internal review of the project (April-July 2007): • Main conclusions: • R&D developments in good shape (CS1 results) • Development costs in line with original estimates • Original 77-station LOFAR relied on significant matching from original international partners (e.g. ATNF, MIT, NRL) • 77 station unrealistic in short-term… • De-scope process initiated - August 2007 • Need for a re-scoped LOFAR presented to NL and international (DE & UK) commiunities • Prof. Ralph Wijers (chairman of NL-ARC) together with the support of the LOFAR project directorate, asked to report to the ASTRON board on: • the extent of the necessary de-scope • the optimal configuration based on (i) the most pessimistic and (ii) a more optimistic scenario • 3 meetings, including an open workshop (17 September 2007)

  2. Wijers’ draft report • Wijers’ draft report presented to the ASTRON board (21 September 2007): • Original LOFAR: • 96 LBA & 96 HBA • HBA ~ 16 m^2 • 32 core stations, 45 outer stations; 77 stations in total • Re-scoped LOFAR: • Core: 96 (48) LBA & 2 x 24 HBA • Outer: 96 (48) LBA + 48 HBA • 25m^2 HBA N.B. Stations smaller but Field of View expanded by x4 • No. of stations reduced: • Minimal (most pessimistic) configuration 36 (18+18) stations • Most optimistic configuration 50 (25+25) station • Build long-baseline stations towards German border

  3. Wijers draft report (cont) Wijers’ draft report presented to the ASTRON board (21 September 2007): • Original LOFAR: • 96 LBA & 96 HBA • HBA ~ 16 m^2 • 32 core stations, 45 outer stations; 77 stations in total • Re-scoped LOFAR: • Core: 96 (48) LBA & 2 x 24 HBA • Outer: 96 (48) LBA + 48 HBA • HBA now 25m^2 N,B, Stations smaller but Field of View expanded by x ~ 4 • No. of NL stations reduced: • Minimal (most pessimistic) configuration 36 (18+18) stations • Most optimistic configuration 50 (25+25) station • Build long-baseline stations towards German border. • International stations remain unchanged in size.

  4. Constraints on rescope • Money: 25 MEUR phase 1 • Rollout Schedule: before end 2009 done • Software = capabilities • Calibrateability • Expandability: (?)0-8 MEUR phase 2, ..... • Eu-LOFAR • Operations: cost control • Other sciences (geo/agro/meteo/....)

  5. LOFAR-ph1 Global • 50%-50% core/outer split in NL, aim for 25+25 • Keep European stations original 96+96 • Make NL stations smaller: • core: 96/48 LBA + 2x24 HBA • outer: 96/48 LBA + 48 HBA • 25 m2 (4x4) HBA tiles • Bias outer stations towards Germany (lopsided configuration)

  6. LOFAR-ph1 rationale - I 50%-50% core/outer split, aim 25+25 • uv-coverage has priority over raw collecting area, both core (EoR, RSM) and outer (resolution, SRV) need to be good  more smaller stations • Below 25+25, good uv-coverage quickly gets harder

  7. LOFAR-ph1 rationale - II Keep European stations 96+96 • Fewer outer baselines: sensitivity very important for calibration • Split-station needs higher data rate and use of larger FOV initially doubtful

  8. LOFAR-ph1 rationale - III NL outer station: 96/48 LBA + 48 HBA • HBA and RCUs are expensive, so reduction most helps more stations • LBA are cheap, hard to add, so put all 96 and use LBL/LBH to connect all, but only 48 can be used. • Select inner/outer 48 • Select ‘minitile sum’ of 2 for better sensitivity • NOTE: 48 has larger FOV!

  9. LOFAR-ph1 rationale - IV NL core station: 96/48 LBA + 2x24 split HBA • LBA same as outer • HBA split in two fields at ends of 100m x 200m field • Better uv-coverage in core • 24-HBA substation has even larger FOV • Price: 2 substation signals out, higher data rate

  10. LOFAR-ph1 rationale - V Maintain long baselines and build lopsided towards Germany • Important for resolution and depth (confusion limit) and connection to E-LOFAR • Lopsided to East gives more weight to long baselines than symmetric distribution around core • Price: more time to fill uv-plane

  11. LOFAR-ph1 Rollout • 20 stations, 13 core + 6 outer + 1 distant outer, by end 2008 • Rest by end 2009, in logistically best order • HBA subCDR and 20-station review should be planned to minimally delay rollout. • Software rollout plan is urgent

  12. LOFAR organisation • ASTRON is the largest partner, assumes the vast majority of risk, provides the expertise and man-power for the development, roll-out and commissioning of LOFAR. • LOFAR Managing Director reports on a daily basis to ASTRON General Director. • Radio Observatory ASTRON will be responsible for LOFAR operations. • Radio Observatory ASTRON will be the international communities contact point for E-LOFAR.

  13. ASTRON / Radio Observatory takes up long-term coordination of LOFAR astronomical exploitation Run as broad common-user observatory, while astronomical user groups focus on their particular science projects. Three-tier allocation of “observing time”: Current LOFAR KSPs given proper recognition: Highly valuable contributions, major undertakings New parties welcomed and encouraged, especially if: Contributing to development of (extended) LOFAR infrastructure Contributing to sustained LOFAR astronomical operations Substantial fraction open to worldwide community. This is vital: To foster the user community For the overall and long-term scientific success Services may be provided for non-astronomical applications, brokered through LOFAR foundation LOFAR Astronomical Exploitation

  14. Astronomical operation of LOFAR and the WSRT in a fully integrated Radio Observatory division Observatory Operations Room in Dwingeloo will be taken into use next month Observatory is interface between R&D and Astronomy (“customer”, “supplier” roles) Observatory contacts for all LOFAR system components New Science Support Group getting established Services may be provided for non-astronomical applications, brokered through LOFAR foundation Evolving Observatory Structure

  15. Minimum critical mass, structure, and composition to allow optimizing: Quality of operations Overall cost Budget now on firm footing Augmentation above minimum critical mass possible in a natural way International share of the operations/costs must be discussed Lessons must be learned for CS1 about best practice operational model Technically: maintenance, operational procedures, documentation Partnerships: RUG/RC, KSP-centres, E-LOFAR, multi-disciplinary aspects, outsourcing Evolving Observatory Structure

  16. The latest commissioning results

More Related