1 / 18

EVLA-II and LOFAR

EVLA-II and LOFAR. Joseph Lazio & Namir Kassim Naval Research Laboratory. EVLA-II Frequencies: 1–50 GHz (+ 300–1000 MHz?) Size: ~ 400 km Sensitivity: 3 Jy (continuum at 1 GHz) Resolution: 0.22 " (at 1 GHz) Receptors: Parabolic antennas(?). LOFAR Frequencies: 10–250 MHz Size: ~ 400 km

rubyevans
Download Presentation

EVLA-II and LOFAR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EVLA-II and LOFAR Joseph Lazio & Namir Kassim Naval Research Laboratory EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  2. EVLA-II Frequencies: 1–50 GHz (+ 300–1000 MHz?) Size: ~ 400 km Sensitivity: 3 Jy (continuum at 1 GHz) Resolution: 0.22" (at 1 GHz) Receptors: Parabolic antennas(?) LOFAR Frequencies: 10–250 MHz Size: ~ 400 km Sensitivity: ~ mJy at 15 MHz  1 km2 at 15 MHz Resolution: ~ arcseconds at 15 MHz Receptors: Banks of dipoles EVLA-II vs. LOFAR EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  3. ~ 50 km > 5 km <5 km Correlation changed Correlation Preserved Background of Low Frequency Radio Astronomy: Mired in the Dark Ages • Radio astronomy began at low frequencies:  ~ 20 MHz. • Until recently, ionospheric effects limited angular resolution and sensitivity severely. • Remains one of the most poorly explored regions of the EM spectrum despite great scientific potential. EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  4. Low Angular Resolution: Limits Sensitivity Due to Confusion  ~ 10’, rms ~ 30 mJy/beam  ~ 1’, rms ~ 3 mJy/beam EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  5. THE 74 MHz NRL-NRAO VLA SYSTEM • 74 MHz VLA system implemented 1993–1997. • Demonstrated self-calibration can remove ionospheric effects • Overdetermined problem with large N array and initial model • Works well at VLA (N=27) • Originally motivated by recognition that phase transfer from higher frequencies can increase coherence times and S/N—rarely required • VLA 74 MHz system is the most powerful long wavelength interferometer in the world. EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  6. 74 MHz VLA: Significant Improvement in Sensitivity and Resolution 74 MHz VLA EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  7. Comparison of Low Frequency Capabilities (past vs. present) Clark Lake (30 MHz) VLA (74 MHz) COMA DEEP FIELD ~5 ~10 sources/square degree ~0.5 sources/square degree ~15 B~ 35 km Ae ~ 3 x 103 m2  ~20”  ~ 25 mJy B~ 5 km Ae ~ 5 x 103 m2  ~ 8’  ~ 1 Jy Kassim 1989 • B ~ 3 km • Ae ~ 3 x 103 m2 •  ~ 15’ (900”) •  ~ 1 Jy Enßlin et al. 1999 EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  8. VLA 74 MHz: New Cluster/Relic System Kassim, Clarke, et al. 2001(ApJ, astro-ph/0103492) A new halo-relic system in the Abell 754 cluster of galaxies discovered recently with the 74 MHz VLA. Relic Cluster Halo Color: ROSAT X-ray image Contours: 74 MHz VLA image EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  9. SNRs: Extrinsic ISM Absorption First example of spatially resolved free-free absorption towards a Galactic SNR (Lacey et al. 2001) EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  10. VLA 74 MHz: Galactic CenterAbsorption Holes => Synchrotron Emissivity Vectors 74 MHz Galactic Center: Preliminary D-configuration Image (~10’) ( Mike Nord, UNM-NRL PhD Thesis Project) Deep absorption hole EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  11. Near-term activities Improve current calibration/imaging algorithms 4MASS project Þ initial LOFAR calibration grid Possible modest near term expansions: Increase the bandwidth at 74 MHz Outfit PT at 74 MHz and implement 74/330 MHz PT link tests 74 MHz campaign on inner few VLBA antennas Longer range: The VLA was not designed to provide good sensitivity at these wavelengths: sidelobes ~ 20dB, Tsys/Ae too high Design a low frequency (10–90 MHz) “station” consisting of several hundred, electronically phased dipoles (for LOFAR). Build prototype stations and use them to enhance the capabilities of the present VLA 74 MHz system. Station I—VLA center; Station II—VLA outlier (e.g., A+ site) 74 MHz VLA System Improvements Main limitations of the present 74 MHz VLA are sensitivity and angular resolution EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  12. Cygnus A Hotspot Spectra Carilli et al. 1991 Resolution of the hotspots at 74 MHz will easily differentiate between competing models for spectral turnover Benefits of Higher Angular Resolution 74 MHz VLA Image Synchrotron Self-absorption Hot spots currently unresolved Low energy cut-off Kassim et al. 1996 330 MHz VLA Image Kassim et al. 74 MHz VLA beam  “Hotspots” EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  13. Outlier Station ObjectiveExtending resolution and u-v coverage  = +20o VLA+PT VLA+PT+Dusty VLA+PT+Dusty+Bernardo EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  14. High Sensitivity StationPrototype for LOFAR Low Frequency Antennas Analogous to one VLA antenna but with > 10x the sensitivity ~100 meter diameter @ 74MHz: VLA antenna ~ 125 m2 LWA Station  1500 m2 (Fractal element distribution shown here is not necessarily our favorite.) EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  15. VLA Scientific Memorandum #146“A Proposal for a Large, LF Array Located at the VLA” (Perley & Erickson 1984) • Provide a significant increase in the capabilities of an existing VLA system. • Prototype a future standalone, broadband array in NM • SM146 concept • Standalone stations along VLA arms • Proceed with EVLA-I? • Augmented SM146 • Addition of A+ capability • Proceed with EVLA-II? EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  16. SM146 CAPABILITY SM146 SM146 SM146 EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  17. Relationship to LOFAR • LOFAR is much more complex than SM146 It has a substantial technology development element as well as scientific goals • Larger Freq. Range (LOFAR: 10–240 MHz; SM146: 10–90 MHz) • Much larger bandwidth (larger than EVLA) • Many more stations (>100) • Complex configuration (log spiral) • much more software, etc … • SM146 and LOFAR: parallel, mutually beneficial • Independent of LOFAR, VLA-based SM146 makes sense EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

  18. SummaryEVLA-II and LOFAR • We are considering a modest, incremental program for enhancing the scientific and technical performance of an existing VLA system. • Some of these have synergetic overlap with planned EVLA activities, e.g., development of a common A+ outlier site • Some of these satisfy NRL’s responsibilities for developing new technology for LOFAR, e.g., low frequency antennas/stations • Our philosophy is to • realize these enhancements in a manner that translates to immediate scientific benefits to the user community; • implement them with minimum impact on VLA/VLBA operations. • These plans also lay the ground work for a broadband standalone system as described in NRAO SM146 • It could possibly proceed in parallel with EVLA I & II. • Lays the ground work/solves essential problems required for realizing LOFAR. EVLA-II - Low Frequencies

More Related