1 / 11

The Flying Wing

The Flying Wing. Idea : To achieve the highest possible L/D in a transport or a bomber, eliminate everything but the wing itself! Pioneers : Northrop, DeHavilland, Handley Page, Lippisch. Northrop XB-35 (nothing but a wing) Design driven by PL – R requirements.

karina-webster
Download Presentation

The Flying Wing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Flying Wing • Idea: To achieve the highest possible L/D in a transport or a bomber, eliminate everything but the wing itself! • Pioneers: Northrop, DeHavilland, Handley Page, Lippisch

  2. Northrop XB-35 (nothing but a wing)Design driven by PL – R requirements

  3. Northrop YB-49 (tail-feathers allowed)Design driven by V – PL – R requirements

  4. The Flying Wing Pros: • No other components to create D • Very low CD0 : comparing a FW w. a CW of equal volume and PL density, both have roughly the same Swet but FW has greater span + buried engines, hence lower D • flying wing ac: 0.008 – 0.011 • conventional ac: 0.015 – 0.02 • Very high L / D [ L / D is inversely proportional to CD0 ] For a given A, L / D may be increased by 40%, resulting in a 40% increase in R for similar WF, TOW, and V. OR gain in fc reduction, engine P and TOW for a specified PL and R. • Wwing is lower [ favorable mass distribution within the wing, reduced BM @ wing root ]

  5. The Flying Wing Pros: • Higher PL weight fractions • Stealth advantage: FW is difficult to detect visually or by radar (Ho IX, B2, F-117) Cons: • Ingress / egress. • Shape of FW is far from ideal for a pressure vessel; W penalty to pressurize the cabin. • Difficult to integrate a pressurized passenger compartment, a cargo compartment and fuel bays. • For small FW, the size of the human body dictates the inclusion of a fuselage, unless pilot sits in supine position. • For large FW the size and type of PL determines whether or not a FW is a suitable configuration.

  6. Horten IX: An early stealth fighter

  7. Northrop B2 stealth Bomber

  8. Lockheed F-117 stealth fighter

  9. The Flying Wing Cons: • Not very good loading flexibility, especially in the case of low density PL. Loading restrictions are necessary both in longitudinal and lateral position. • Nil stretch potential (cannot increase PL). • S of a FW tends to be larger than S of conventional ac (defeats part of the L/D advantage). • Incapable of producing high CLmax (flaps @ TE cause nose-down PM, which cannot be trimmed; must use low W/S for TO and LND, which results in low cruise efficiency). • High load factors in turbulent air result in uncomfortable ride + heavy workload for the pilot. FW response to control surface deflections and bumps is accompanied by a poorly damped phugoid and an oscillatory short period motion. • Difficult to achieve good W & B + S & C characteristics: • Lack of moment arm • Difficult to have cg ahead of ac (entire PL must be in the forward part of the wing). Solutions: Reflex airfoils, wing sweep, tip-mounted fins. Problem: reduced L/D. • Good news: for high-performance ac can use SAS (Stability Augmentation System); w. enough power to drive the SAS a FW can be made to behave quite nicely!

  10. Span-Loader

  11. Span-Loader Idea: PL is distributed along the wing span (Lockheed concept: TOW = 2,354,000 lbs). Pros: • Reduced wing structural W. Cons: • Need to support PL throughout the wing span to the tips. Requires very large taxiways, not available at current airports. Solution: air-cushion LND system @ each wing tip and @ centerbody. • Adverse ground effects result in low flap effectiveness.

More Related