1 / 14

Preliminary analysis of presentations

Preliminary analysis of presentations. Arve Meisingset Telenor R&D. Category. Rick. Bertram. Daniel. Clive. Amardeo. Comments. eODL. Core/ Some. URN. MSC. SDL. Enterprise viewpoint. Information viewpoint. Rick. Computational viewpoint. Rele- vance. Engineering viewpoint.

karissaj
Download Presentation

Preliminary analysis of presentations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Preliminary analysis of presentations Arve Meisingset Telenor R&D

  2. Category Rick Bertram Daniel Clive Amardeo Comments eODL Core/Some URN MSC SDL Enterprise viewpoint Information viewpoint Rick Computational viewpoint Rele- vance Engineering viewpoint Technology viewpoint Categorisations of ASN.1, TTCN and UML are missing

  3. Category Rick Daniel Clive Amardeo Bertram Open Distributed Processing URN SDL MSC Core/Some eODL Enterprise viewpoint Information viewpoint Rick Computational viewpoint Rele- vance Engineering viewpoint Technology viewpoint SDL MSC URN Core? SDL Core SDL eODL Core MSC URN(UCM) ? Some?

  4. Category Bertram Daniel Summary Amardeo Clive Phases SDL Core/Some MSC eODL URN Surveying Analysis Rick Overall design Rele- vance Detailed design Implementation Validation and testing Intro., train. and conv. Operation and use Some URN URN MSC Core eODL? MSC SDL Core URN? eODL? SDL eODL MSC Core MSC SDL Core SDL MSC Core URN URN Some eODL? Some

  5. Category Bertram Daniel Clive Amardeo Summary Scale of granularity Core/Some SDL MSC URN eODL Module development System development Rick System planning and organization Rele- vance Interoperation plan. betw. organizat. Information society planning ? ? Core MSC eODL Core? URN eODL SDL MSC Some? SDL MSC

  6. Category Bertram Daniel Clive Amardeo Media SDL MSC URN eODL Alpha-gra. screens Graphic screens Rick Reports Rele- vance Databases Telecom. lines Interoperation between processes Some? SDL? Some MSC? Some Some? Some MSC eODL SDL MSC Core

  7. Category Bertram Amardeo Clive Daniel Application areas and Usages URN SDL MSC Data oriented approach Process oriented approach Rick End user help Rele- vance Application software development Application software management Tool development eODL eODL Core? eODL Core URN MSC SDL ? Core SDL URN MSC eODL eODL Some? ?

  8. Category Bertram Daniel Clive Summary Amardeo Language categories MSC SDL URN Core/Some Control flow Data flow Rick Precedence relations between data Rele- vance Transformations between data Nesting of schemata eODL Core SDL MSC URN Core ? MSC Some? ? Core?

  9. Category Summary Amardeo Clive Daniel Bertram Structures and Implementations Core/Some SDL MSC URN Static structures Behaviour Rick Abstract Rele- vance Detailed eODL Core? SDL eODL URN SDL Core URN(UCM) MSC Some? MSC SDL eODL URN MSC Core SDL

  10. Category Clive Bertram Daniel Amardeo Summary Schema types URN MSC Core/Some SDL Layout schema Contents schema Rick External terminology schema Rele- vance Concept schema Internal terminology schema Distribution schema Physical schema System schema eODL Core SDL Some eODL eODL? Core? SDL? eODL

  11. Category Daniel Bertram Clive Amardeo Summary Levels and constraints SDL MSC URN Core/Some Instantiation language Type language Rick Selection, projection and union Rele- vance eODL Core SDL eODL SDL Core eODL

  12. Category Daniel Bertram Clive Amardeo Summary Usage granularity Core/Some SDL URN MSC Individual relative to task Individual to several tasks Rick Market segments with variations Organizations independ. of tasks Office with collaborating individuals Rele- vance eODL SDL URN MSC eODL? SDL URN MSC MSC SDL URN URN SDL MSC URN

  13. Category Bertram Daniel Amardeo Clive Usages: Closeness, intention,scenario and collaboration URN MSC SDL Terminal users Data users Rick Goals Rele- vance Requirements Hands on use Scenario language Translations between tiles Relations between tiles eODL SDL ? ? Core Core? MSC? URN(GRL) Core eODL? SDL MSC URN Core ? SDL URN(UCM) Core MSC ? ?

  14. Summary Need more responses and validation. Some need for coordination of languages both use and mappings. The languages do not have focus on - technology - end user perspectives and use - management - data and media All the four points are essential to Telecom Operators. These conclusions may not be surprising. The Tile architecture seems to serve the role as an analysis tool, but needs better definitions and requirements, as concluded in the first workshop

More Related