1 / 24

Factitious Disorder by Proxy

Factitious Disorder by Proxy. Presentations in Special Education 2011 TEDA Conference. AGENDA. History Definition/Diagnostic Criteria Impact in educational settings Implications for special education Symptoms Recommendations Assistance in research. History.

kasi
Download Presentation

Factitious Disorder by Proxy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Factitious Disorder by Proxy Presentations in Special Education 2011 TEDA Conference

  2. AGENDA • History • Definition/Diagnostic Criteria • Impact in educational settings • Implications for special education • Symptoms • Recommendations • Assistance in research

  3. History • better known as Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (MBP) • Munchausen was an 18th century German baron who entertained his friends with tales from his military experience that grew more exaggerated with each re-telling

  4. History cont’d • Richard Asher, M.D., first described ‘Munchausen Syndrome’ in 1951 after treating patients who intentionally injured themselves • Roy Meadow, M.D., coined term “MBP” in 1977 to describe caregivers who induced illness in children

  5. Definition • According to DSM-IV (1994) Factitious Disorder is: • ‘intentional production or feigning of physical or psychological signs or symptoms’ • Motivation—assume role of sick person without external incentives, i.e., economic gain • Factitious Disorder by Proxy (FDP) falls under category of “Factitious Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified”

  6. Definition (cont’d) • According to DSM-IV-TR uses same definition with 3 subtypes • Primarily physical symptoms • Primarily psychological symptoms • Both physical & psychological symptoms • Again, FDP falls under ‘Factitious Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified’

  7. Other diagnostic criteria used by different authors • Children do not demonstrate symptoms of illness when child is away from caretaker • Initially, parents constantly at child’s bedside; later parents tend to spend time elsewhere • Parents welcome medical tests, even when told they are painful • Parents sometimes have background in health profession

  8. Other diagnostic criteria used by different authors • Add or change physicians frequently • Appear overly attached to children even though physical affect is unworried or inappropriate • Develop close relationships with medical personnel • Resistant to psychiatric involvement • Over time of hospitalization, spend less time with child

  9. Pay-off for parent • Attention from family, friends, & hospital staff members for being long-suffering, patient parent of chronically-ill child • Satisfaction of being smart enough to outwit highly respected medical professionals who cannot diagnose what is wrong with their child

  10. Differential Diagnosis • Malingering—definite external incentive for falsifying illness or injury (paid leave from job, disability benefits) • Child custody battles between divorced parents—one parent falsifies injury and blames other parent

  11. What does this have to do with Special Education? • Small body of literature indicating that FDP scenario is occurring in educational settings • Pay-off appears to be similar attention from family, friends, & educational personnel without requirement of physically harming the child

  12. Two Ways FDP presents in Special Educational Settings • Child with genuine medical problems that are aggravated/exaggerated by caregiver • Parent may request extensive, unnecessary nursing care at school • Child who is physically healthy but parent requests/demands repeated evaluation for SLD, ADHD, Autism, and other eligibilities

  13. FDP & Educational Settings • Conditions from research literature that have been falsified include • Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (most prevalent) • Specific Learning Disabilities • Autism • Behavioral difficulties/emotional disturbance • Neuropsychological problems

  14. Prevalence Estimate • Ayoub reported an incidence of 11.5% of her subjects (child victims of FDP) had falsified conditions that would require special education services • No conclusive way to estimate prevalence of FDP in educational settings (still difficult to estimate incidence of FDP in medical settings)

  15. Implications for Special Education • Cost of time & money for initial Full Individual Evaluations • Cost of additional psychological or medical evaluations (and possibly others) • Cost of providing services to children who are genuinely NOT eligible for services • Cost of going to due process hearing to defend school district’s stand that child is not eligible and additional services are not appropriate

  16. Parental symptoms in special education • Called ‘high-maintenance’ parent or ‘over-involved’ parent • IEP meetings MUST include presence of every person who works with child (i.e. SLP, OTR, RPT cannot send reports) • IEP meetings known to last 2+ hours • Parents bring their own specialists, sometimes attorneys • Parents repeatedly bring up other issues before they sign IEP

  17. Other Considerations • Harry & Klingner (2006) called 4 eligibilities under IDEA ‘judgment calls’ because diagnosis requires clinical judgment rather than verifiable data • Mild Mental Retardation • Specific Learning Disability • Serious Emotional Disturbance • Speech/Language Impairment • Possibly increases chance of disabilities being falsified

  18. Other Considerations • Schreier and Libow (1993) theorize that FDP evolves over time • caregivers may initially bring child to physician for genuine reason, enjoy attention, and then gradually aggravate or induce illness • Possible for caregivers to begin getting attention by demanding educational services and progress to demanding medical care (or vice-versa)

  19. What can you do? • When you suspect you may be dealing with FDP parent, must decide how far you can go accommodating them • As in dealing with difficult child, don’t threaten anything unless you are prepared to follow through • Do your homework & be prepared to defend decision not to proceed with further evaluations or services

  20. What can you do? • Expect parents to get angry with you & insult your training, intelligence, competence • Be prepared for the worst, (parent going to press) • May need legal counsel for yourself separate from school district’s lawyer

  21. Have you had similar experiences? • Difficult to research • Not supposed to evaluate & diagnose parents • Not trained for psychological evaluations or diagnoses • FDP rarely identified or diagnosed until child is actually physically near death • Meet many Ed. Diags. who have similar stories to tell

  22. Want to help? • Give demographics • Enrollment data of school district • Years of experience as Ed.Diag. • Anecdotal information with no identifying information on student or parents • Any other information you feel comfortable giving • Contact information on you

  23. Sources • Bucuvalas, A. (2003). Munchausen by proxy in school settings: an interview with Associate Professor Catherine Ayoub. Harvard Graduate School of Education News, January 1, 2003. • Feldman, M. (2004) Playing sick? Untangling the web of Munchausen syndrome, Munchausen by proxy, malilngering, and factitious disorder. New York: Brunner-Routledge • Harry & Klinger (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race & disability in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

  24. Contact Me! • Ellen M. Frye, Ed.D. • efrye@lubbockisd.org • trap4trivia@aol.com • ellen.frye@wayland.wbu.edu

More Related