1 / 8

Wrap up session

Wrap up session. Stakeholder workshop for the exchange of practical experience with the implementation of the VOC Solvent Emissions Directive 1999/13/EC Brussels 17th-18th June 2010. Why were we here?.

kasi
Download Presentation

Wrap up session

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Wrap up session Stakeholder workshop for the exchange of practical experience with the implementation of the VOC Solvent Emissions Directive 1999/13/EC Brussels 17th-18th June 2010

  2. Why were we here? • Share practical experience with implementation amongst stakeholders and improve understanding • Formulate recommendations for practical solutions and best practice

  3. Feedback • Please let us have your thoughts • Feedback forms – please hand in at the end

  4. Thursday morning • Experience in an older Member State (Mike Etkind) • Guidance notes – in partnership with stakeholders, ongoing support • Taking a proportional approach – experience of authorities is key • Solvent management plan – typologies (Paul Verspoor) • SMP can be made simple in many cases • Use of O5 (destroyed) can be avoided – important as prone to accuracy problems

  5. Thursday afternoon • A: Uncertainties in inputs: • Significant range of different products – complexity • CEPE proposal on median concentration for groups of similar coatings • Worst case situation taken in some cases to test compliance • B/C: Uncertainties in WG and non-emissions • SMP templates developed by some Member States • Various guidance available – including for inspections • Wastes – highly case-specific and variable • Less expensive surrogates for continuous monitoring can reduce uncertainties in WG emission estimates • D: Fugitive emissions • German approach (O1.1/O1.2) to drive reduction scheme and avoid uncertainty on allocation of emissions • Various useful approaches for determining F = I – O5, no one size fits all solution • Importance of obtaining and checking detailed information

  6. Friday morning • Dutch experience with reduction scheme • Manual detailing options for each activity (>=4 options) • Compliance checklists, helpdesks • Equation for simplification of RS in certain cases • Italian experiences • Challenges in applying when existing legislation (ELVs) existed already • Many installations already complied with stricter ELVs than Annex IIA – affected route to compliance

  7. Your thoughts … • What will you take away from the workshop? • What are your main priorities in implementation for the future? • Any other issues to raise?

  8. Thank you • For your work today and yesterday • For your inputs prior to the workshop

More Related