230 likes | 389 Views
Determining Coercion and Undue Influence . Belmont: Payment can be undue when either excessive or inappropriateWebster dictionary definition of coercion
E N D
1. Paying Research Subjects: Regulations, Policy, and Research Monika Markowitz, PhD, MSN, RN, MA
Office of Research Compliance and Education
Office of the Vice President for Research
Betsy Ripley, MD, MS
Professor, Internal Medicine – Division of Nephrology
Chair, IRB Leadership and Enhancement Committee
4th Friday for Research Coordinators
October 2009
2. Determining Coercion and Undue Influence Belmont: Payment can be undue when either excessive or inappropriate
Webster dictionary definition of coercion
“the use of express or implied threats of violence or reprisal… or other intimidating behavior that puts a person in immediate fear of the consequences in order to compel that person to act against his or her will”
Perhaps a better question: Is the individual likely to act against their better judgment in order to receive the payment?
3. Undue Influence or Coercive?
4. Examples of Potential Problems with Payment Healthy volunteer in a pharmacokinetic study received $1000. For a “less risky” study he later said “$400 seems cheap”
HIV positive or not for $40 or $400
Pharmaceutical study dispute between investigator and sponsor as to what was appropriate payment
NIH sleep study false history given. Participant died in the study. She had received $1300 for that and a previous study.
5. Guidelines and Regulations
7. Ethical Debate Autonomy
Vulnerable Populations
Children
Patient Participants
Uninsured Participants
Integrity of the study
8. Autonomy Ashcroft: Freedom of contract
Kuczewski: those who are desperate for treatment and those that enroll for payment have their autonomy compromised
IRB role: Assure that the competent individual is given the information required to make an informed decision- consent process. For the incompetent person assure the LAR understands and acts in the individuals best interest.
9. Children American Academy of Pediatrics (1995)
Payment is consistent with the “traditions and ethics of society”
2 safeguards recommended
Parents should receive no more than a token gesture of appreciation
Payment given directly to children should not be disclosed until the end of the study.
Potential concern: Who is receiving the payment and who is subjected to the risks? Who is experiencing the cost?
IRB: Determine why the payment is being given- reimbursement for expenses, incentive, or token of appreciation. Determine who will receive the payment and how. Informing Children or LAR?
10. Patient Participants FDA neither supports nor prohibits
Macklin (1982) “it is ethically inappropriate to pay patients”
Resnik (2001) Therapeutic misconception in addition to payment may make unhealthy subjects more prone to undue influence
Grady (2001) Payment may be a demonstration of respect and appreciation
Uninsured Patient Population: Pace (2003): Those doing research as a means of obtaining health care and uninsured may stand to benefit less from the research findings
IRB: Ensure participants understand the treatment options, the research nature of the study, and the risks/benefits
11. Integrity of the Study Reduction in the quality of the information they provide
Bentley and Thacker (2004) study of pharmacy students showed that payment influenced some respondents’ potential to conceal information about restricted activities
The expectation of payment by participants and the impact on smaller unfunded studies.
12. Choosing Appropriate Payment Menikoff (2001) include risk as a determinant
Heath (2001) based on investigator’s and study needs
Grady (2001) standardized and calculated like unskilled laborers
Shamoo and Resnik (2001) guaranteed a minimum wage but no upper limit and the use of collective bargaining
Lemmons and Elliiott (2001) business relationship including workers compensation and safe working conditions
McEachern (2005) occasional participant versus professional participant (temporary versus career workers)
13. Empirical Research IRB Members at VCU
Investigators and non-investigators at VCU
WIRB Members
National Survey of Investigators
National Survey of IRB Chairs
Asked to respond to impact of payment on research participation involving:
- Questionnaires -Substance Abuse
- HIV Risk Reduction -Hypertension
14. Reasons for Payment
15. Participant Factors for Determining Payment
16. Study Related Factors for Determining Payment
17. What is the most important factor for determining payment?Top Three Factors VCU Investigators
Risk to participants 46.7%
Time Involvement 19.1%
Inconvenience 15.7%
VCU IRB
Risk to participants 50%
Inconvenience 26.5%
Time Involvement 18%
VCU Non- Investigators
Risk to participants 71.4%
Time Involvement 10.1%
Inconvenience 5.4%
WIRB
Inconvenience 25%
Risk to participant 24%
Time Involvement 24%
18. $ Payment for Research Activities
19. Paying VCU research subjects to participate in research - Policy
Gift card/cash policy for research subject compensation: Gift Card Policy
http://www.vcu.edu/procurement/GiftCardPolicy.doc
Since January 2009!
IRS thinks of gift cards as cash – need SS#’s and W9
20. Procure gift cards for 2 purposes: Compensating participants in an IRB-approved study/ clinical trial
Compensating those completing a University- approved survey
Should not be purchased in advance
If immediate compensation is necessary, required VP approval
21. Obtaining gift cards (if SS# collected): Treasury Services – Wachovia VISA gift cards
$25 – 100 increments ($1.95 fee per card)
See order form on policy. Submit form and completed W-9s to Accounts Payable. Picked up within 10 days from Cashier’s Office.
Purchase Order for cards from retail stores –
eg. < $25, submit PO and W9s to Procurement; no reimbursements for advance purchased gift cards
Petty Cash – W9s and Direct Pay form to Accounts Payable after service performed to replenish Petty Cash account
22. Procedure for subject compensation:(See Gift Card Policy for specifics) Informed consent form describes need for SS#; however refusal to do so does not preclude participation
Participant completes Substitute W9 form – with SS#
Logistics:
For Wachovia gift cards, order form to Treasury Services, W9s to Procurement, pick up from Cashier’s Office
For purchase order, submit PO and W9s to Procurement
Petty Cash – Direct Pay form and W9s to Procurement
23. Options if SS# not collected gift catalog – See Attachment A for catalog ordering
gift certificate – For specific item
Neither of above considered a monetary compensation if below $50
3) gift card with permission of VP - Still requires W9 without SS#, account index for 28% withholding, spreadsheet maintenance; permission of VP
24. Maintain all records Safeguard gift cards – same as cash
PIs/coordinators responsible to maintain logs on each compensated participant: gift card ID, value, subject name, W9 document
Regular reconciliation
Gift card logs subject to audit similar to Petty Cash funds