1 / 29

Texture Sprites: Texture Elements Splatted on Surfaces

This research paper explores a novel approach for texture representation in 3D models, addressing issues such as storage costs, dynamic texture updates, and efficient rendering. The proposed method, called Sprite-Based Textures, offers a parameterization-free solution that enables the seamless integration of dynamic decal management and animated texture elements. By implementing a hierarchical grid structure and utilizing GPU acceleration, the system allows for interactive control over sprite attributes, leading to versatile texturing effects and improved memory efficiency.

katelync
Download Presentation

Texture Sprites: Texture Elements Splatted on Surfaces

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Texture Sprites: Texture Elements Splatted on Surfaces Sylvain LefebvreSamuel HornusFabrice Neyret GRAVIR/IMAG-INRIAACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games 2005

  2. Abstract

  3. Introduction • Texturing 3D models with very high resolutions create two major difficulties • Storage cost of high resolution texture maps can easily exceed the available texture memory • Creating high resolution textures proves to be a difficult and tedious task • Lack of representation for textures composed of sparse elements • Wastes a lot of memory • Discontinuities • Flickering due to Z-fighting

  4. Introduction • Texture sprites • The texture element live on the object surface and can be updated dynamically • Provides a general and convenient scheme for sprite-based texturing • Homogeneous appearances obtained by overlapping many sprites • Interactive addition of local details • Geometry and composite texture are independent • Not require: 1) mesh to conform to any constraint 2) global planar parameterization 3) modify the initial mesh

  5. Contributions • A parameterization-free texture representation allowing efficient storage and filtered rendering of composite textures • An efficient solution to dynamic decal management and animated texture elements • New appealing texturing effects • Complete GPU-implementation

  6. Sprite-Based Textures • Key idea • Store the sprite attributes (position, orientation, etc) in a 3D hierarchical structure surrounding the mesh • Follow the idea of octree textures • The sprites attributes in the leaves of the hierarchical grid • The entire data-structure is compact • Many sprites share a same texture pattern • Information is stored only around the surface

  7. Sprite-Based Textures • Easy to author • add, drag, drop, change size, and orientation • The system is very flexible • Sprite ordering is controllable • Sprite overlapping can be mixed • Each sprite can be independently animated • For instance: react to surface deformations

  8. Difficulties • How to manage the hierarchical 3D grid on the GPU (fragment program) • How to use the hierarchical 3D grid to store and retrieve sprites attributes • How to filter the composite texture and blend overlapping sprites together

  9. 3D Hierarchical Grid (in GPU) • Problem • Store the hierarchical grid in texture memory • Retrieve data from the grid at a given 3D location • (This is implemented in a fragment program) • We call this structure N3-tree • N in each dimension • Octree → N = 2 • Implementation: N = 4

  10. N3-tree Memory Layout • Tree structure • Node: indirection grid consisting of N3 cells • Cell content: (cell type is determined by a flag stored in the A-channel) • A = 1, data (leaf) • A = ½ , a pointer • A = 0, empty • Store our structure in a 3D texture called the indirection pool • Data values and pointer values are stored as RGB-triples

  11. Notations • N*N*N: resolution of the indirection grid corresponding to each tree node • Nl*Nl*Nl: resolution of virtual 3D grid at level l • At level l a point M in space ( M [0, 1)3 ) lies in a cell located atand has a local coordinate within this cell. We have

  12. Notations • Node are packed in the indirection pool • S = (Su, Sv, Sw): size of indirection pool • NSu*NSv*NSw: resolution of the texture hosting the indirection pool • A texture value in the indirection pool is indexed by a real valued P [0, 1)3 • P = Pi+Pf

  13. Notations • Pi identifies the node which is stored in the area • Pi is called the node coordinates • Pfis the local coordinate of P within the node’s indirection grid • (!! Packing the cells does not change the local coordinates.) Equation(1)

  14. Tree Lookup • For rendering, we need to retrieve the data corresponding to a given location M in space (more precisely, on the object surface) • This is done per-pixel in a fragment program • Start from level 0 in the tree • At level l let Pl,i be the coordinate of the current node in the indirection pool • The RGBA value corresponding to M is found in Pl,i at the location Pl,f , obtained by Equation(1) • A: in a leaf (return), an empty node (discard) or an internal node (continue to the next level (l+1) )

  15. Implementation Details • To avoid precision issues, and minimize storage requirements we store S‧Pl,i instead of Pl,i in the indirection cells • S‧Pl,i is an integer • Optimized the encoding: choose the number of bits to stored in the RGB channels to exactly represent at most S indices • The values of the pointers do not depend on the size of the indirection pool

  16. Precision Limitations • The limited precision of 32 bits floating point: • Limit on the depth, resolution, number of nodes of the hierarchical grid

  17. Managing the Texture Sprites • Each sprite is associated with • various parameters • a bounding volumeV defining the spatial limit of the sprite influence on the composite texture • Bounding volumeV is used to • determine which cells are covered by sprite • detect whether two sprites overlap

  18. Storing Sprite Parameters • Sprite parameter table is a texture containing all the parameters for all the sprites • Each sprite corresponds to an index into this texture; each texel encodes a parameter set • Store the index of the sprite parameters in the tree leaf data field • The RGB value encodes a pointer to the sprite parameter table

  19. Dealing with Overlapping Sprites • Leaf vectors table • This 3D texture implements a table of vectors storing the sprite parameters associated with a leaf • 2 dimensions: the vector • 1 dimension: to index thevector of sprite parameters • Instead of directly storing the index of one sprite in the leaves, we now store an index to the leaf vector

  20. Adding a Sprite to the Tree • Leaf splitting occurs only in full leaves (Omax) • Cmax < Omax • Insertion failures • The maximum depth level is reached only when more than Omax sprites are crowded in the same very small region • Ordering of sprites • Order the sprites in the leaf vectors

  21. Positioning the Sprites on the Surface • Associate a frame to each sprite and use a parallel projection to surface • The positioning parameters • A center point c (sprite handle) • Two vectors l, h • defining the plane, scale, orientation of the pattern • A normal vector n (direction of projection) • M: (l, h, n) • U = M-1‧(P-c) • U = (u, v, w): texture coordinates within the pattern

  22. Positioning the Sprites on the Surface • Deformation-proof texturing • Store a 3D parameterization (u, v, w) at each vertex and interpolated as usual for any fragment • Blending sprites • When multiple sprite overlap, the resulting color is computed by blending together their contributions • Non standard blending modes • Blobby-painting cellular textures

  23. Filtering • Linear interpolation (for close viewpoint) • standard texture unites of the GPU • MIP-mapping of sprites • standard texture unites of the GPU

  24. Applications and Result • Texture authoring • Interactively scaled, rotated, or moved above or below the already existing sprites • Lapped texture approximation • The sample is stored only once • N3-tree minimizes the memory space required for positioning information • Rendering does not suffer from filtering issues created by atlases

  25. Applications and Result • Animated sprites • Modify the positioning parameters (position, orientation, scaling) • A sprite can cycle over a set of texture patterns, simulating an animation in a cartoon-like fashion • Snake scales • Estimate the local geometric distortion and scale the sprites accordingly to compensate for the deformation of the animated mesh

  26. Performance

  27. Storage Requirements

  28. Conclusions • High texturing resolution at low memory cost • Without need for a global planar parameterization • The sprite’s attributes are efficiently stored in a hierarchical grid surrounding the object’s surface • Flexible • Each sprite can be independently animated, moved, scaled, rotated • Create new texturing effects, such as animated texture, textures reacting to mesh deformations • Complete GPU implementation, real-time performance

  29. Future Work • Painterly rendering • Sprite projector functions • For point-based and volumetric representation

More Related