1 / 21

Probabilistic Tracking in a Metric Space

Kentaro Toyama and Andrew Blake Microsoft Research Presentation prepared by: Linus Luotsinen. Probabilistic Tracking in a Metric Space. Outline. Introduction Modelling of images and observations Pattern theoretic tracking Learning Learn mixture centers (exemplars)

kathy
Download Presentation

Probabilistic Tracking in a Metric Space

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Kentaro Toyama and Andrew Blake Microsoft Research Presentation prepared by: Linus Luotsinen Probabilistic Tracking in a Metric Space

  2. Outline • Introduction • Modelling of images and observations • Pattern theoretic tracking • Learning • Learn mixture centers (exemplars) • Learn kernel parameters (observational likelihood) • Learn dynamic model (transition probabilities) • Practical tracking • Results • Human motion using curve based exemplars • Mouth using exemplars from raw image • Conclusions

  3. Introduction • Metric Mixture, M2 • Combine exemplars in metric space with probabilistic treatments • Models easily created directly from training set • Dynamic model to deal with occlusion • Problems with other probabilistic approaches • Complex models • Training required for each object to be tracked • Difficult to fully automate

  4. Pattern Theoretic Tracking - Notation

  5. a b c Metric Functions • True metric function • All constraints • Distance function • Without 3 and 4

  6. Modelling of Images and Observations • Patches • Image sub-region • Shuffle distance function • Distance with the most similar pixel in its neighborhood • Curves • Edge maps • Chamfer distance function • Distance to the nearest pixel in the binary images • See next slide!

  7. Exemplar - T Not a true metric! Distance image – dI Original image Feature image - I Probabilistic Modelling of Images and Observations • Curves with Chamfer distance

  8. “patches” Exemplar(from a training set): - Intensity images- Feature images (edges, corners…) • Geometrical Transform: • Translation- Affine- Projective… “curves” Pattern Theoretic Tracking Observation

  9. Exemplars xk(k=1…K) Given Image Geometric Transform Tα(α A) x1: x2: z: Tα1 x3: Tα2 Tα3 x4: Pattern Theoretic Tracking

  10. 1) - A set of KExemplars. 2) - Distribution of observations around – Likelihood: 3) - Prior about dependency between states – Dynamics: t-1 t Pattern Theoretic Tracking - Learning

  11. xm 1) Find “central” exemplar - 2) “Align” other images to z0 - Learning Mixture Centers Goal - given M images (zm), find K exemplars: zm m=1…M

  12. 3) Find K “distinct” exemplars - 4) Cluster the rest by minimal distance - 5) Find new representatives - Learning Mixture Centers

  13. z Learning Kernel Parameters 1) Using a “validation set” find distances between images and their exemplars: 2) Approx. distances as chi-square: (to find σ and d) 3) Then the observation likelihood is:

  14. Learning Dynamics • Learn a Markov matrix for by histogramming transitions • Run a first order auto-regressive process (ARP) for , with coefficients calculated using the Yule-Walker algorithm

  15. z2 z1 z3 zT 0 0 X1 0.09 1 X2 X3 0 0.01 0.2 0 X4 … 3 2 t= T 1 Practical Tracking • Forward algorithm • Results are chosen by

  16. Results • Tracking human motion • Based on contour edges • Dynamics learned on 5 sequences of 100 frames each Same person, motion not seen in training sequence Exemplars

  17. Results • Tracking human motion • Based on contour edges • Dynamics learned on 5 sequences of 100 frames each Different person Different person with occlusion (power of dynamic model)

  18. Results • Tracking person’s mouth motion • Based on raw pixel values • Training sequence was 210 frames captured at 30Hz • Exemplar set was 30 (K=30) • Left image show test sequence • Right image show maximum a posteriori Using shuffle distance Using L2 distance

  19. Results • Tracking ballerina • Larger exemplar sets (K=300)

  20. Conclusions • Metric Mixture (M2) Model • Easier to fully automate learning • Avoid explicit parametric models to describe target objects • Generality • Metrics can be chosen without significant restrictions • Temporal fusion of information for occlusion recovery • Bayesian networks

  21. References • [1] Kentaro Toyama, Andrew Blake, Probabilistic Tracking with Exemplars in a Metric Space, International Journal of Computer Vision, Volume 48, Issue 1, Marr Prize Special Issue, Pages: 9–19, 2002, ISSN:0920-5691. • [2] Jongwoo Lim, CSE 252C: Selected Topics in Vision & Learning. http://www-cse.ucsd.edu/classes/fa02/cse252c/ • [3] Eli Schechtman and Neer Saad, Advanced topics in computer and human vision. http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~armin/AdvVision02/course.html

More Related