380 likes | 539 Views
Coexistence of Threatened Species and Maintenance Works . Paul Collins and Elizabeth Dixon. The Shoalhaven. The balancing act. National Park Vegetated land = Threatened flora and fauna habitat. Threatened species??? I haven’t seen any…. Green and Golden Bellfrog. Protected Federally
E N D
Coexistence of Threatened Species and Maintenance Works Paul Collins and Elizabeth Dixon
The balancing act National Park Vegetated land = Threatened flora and fauna habitat
Green and Golden Bellfrog • Protected Federally • Protected in NSW • Has a Recovery Plan • Crippled by disease Struggling to survive everywhere except in the Shoalhaven…
Swamp Worrigee Urban area Equestrian Common Council operated Cemetery Swamp
To This From This
The perfect conditions – early 2010 • Heavy summer rainfall • Ponding where previously dry • Repeat intense rain events • Other frogs to eat • Flushing of predator fish • Nearby swamp • Overcoming killer fungus = millions of frogs + Blocked drains
The expansion of the population over the last two years represents the most significant natural recovery of any threatened vertebrate species in the state! Fat and healthy!
= work
Big problems • Frogs invading urban area – need to educate • Frogs and graves – don’t mix • Disruption of drain maintenance – no dig, slash or spray • Halt to construction projects • Delays to DA’s • Confusion • Complaints of flooding • Work crews scared of being fined • Can’t maintain the equestrian or sporting fields
Had to find a way to continue maintenance without having a significant impact on the frogs Sustainable management = gather more information
Traffic Casualties? What = significant impact? What = sustainable impact? Slashing?
Too ‘hop’ to handle • Large Events scheduled – threat of cancellation • Short term Response • Mayor – appeal for public understanding • Involved NPWS • Joint media release – stressing the positive nature of breeding event • Letterbox drops - education • Ecologist in to advise – rope off areas to minimise impact • Up-skill ground crews to identify the frog • Set mitigation measures for equestrian events
One of the mitigation measures Simple but effective!
Working with the Media • Make your staff available, don’t leave it to chance • Educate – no overnight solution ‘Stopping Australia from mowing it’s lawn’ ‘The most powerful frog in the nation’
‘Life and death along the food chain’ ‘Hop Property’
GGBF – before 2010 • 1998 – became aware of GGBF at Culburra Beach • 2000 – Mgmt Plan developed for drainage maintenance • 2000 to 2009 – Drought, No Frogs for many years • 2008/09 – GGBF study to test the need for current restrictions - but too dry to be conclusive, defer till 09/10
GGBF – 2010 + • Summer 2009/10 – Wet conditions • Early 2010 - massive increase in GGBF numbers • New areas affected • More activities affected – drains, roadsides, mowing • A extra study required at Worrigee & Crookhaven River Floodplain • Studies lead to standard operating procedures
Valuable Information • Studies & local experts: • Suitable habitat areas • Actual sightings – locations recorded • Breeding times & locations • Foraging times & locations • Dispersal corridors • Control Measures to mitigate impact • Std Operating Procedures
Adjusting work practices • Fundamental shift – Environmental staff now play a key role in delivery of engineering activities & projects • Proactive use of environmental legislation to protect staff • Consistent documentation of mitigation measures • Life cycle determines when key works can occur: • No digging during hibernation (winter) • Slashing occurs while frogs underground or with a pre- inspection by an environmental officer • Coded maps dictate primary habitat – extra controls here
Outcomes • Procedures developed for road & drainage maintenance • OEH authorised procedures & issued a Section 95(2) Certificate under TSC Act • Maintenance Activities resume • Capital works - piped an open drain - REF required frog habitat areas - depressions & suitable plantings for refuge • Equestrian Common drain not widened – road raised to divert water away from camping and horse stalls – avoid GGBF & acid sulphate issues • Cemetery development to factor in a frog habitat area as a feature rather than a constraint
Broadening this approach to other areas • E.g. Flood mitigation drains • Key fish habitat • Acid sulfate soils • Endangered Ecological Communities • Threatened Species • Next – stockpile sites, work adjacent to Nat Pk Estates The less you know – the more conservative your operations will be
Lessons Learnt • Sustainable solutions are possible • Embed qualified help – ecologists into works and services maintenance and construction teams • Develop processes to mitigate impacts • Know the legislation and protect your staff • Get to know the population/species • Talk to OEH and NPWS – very helpful • Use the legislation – e.g. TSC Act, Infrastructure SEPP • Educate your work crews • Avoid, mitigate, demonstrate no significant impact
Excellence in the Environment Awards Highly commended Category: Natural Environment Protection and Enhancement: On Ground Works Sharing good outcomes - not always second nature Keynote Case study at