1 / 30

Challenges for Comparative Research on Philanthropy in Europe

Challenges for Comparative Research on Philanthropy in Europe. René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam ,The Netherlands R.Bekkers@vu.nl. Research Questions. How large are differences in philanthropy (incidence, amounts, causes) between nations in Europe?

kaya
Download Presentation

Challenges for Comparative Research on Philanthropy in Europe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Challenges for Comparative Research on Philanthropy in Europe René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies, VU University Amsterdam ,The Netherlands R.Bekkers@vu.nl ISTR Conference, Siena

  2. Research Questions • How large are differences in philanthropy (incidence, amounts, causes) between nations in Europe? • How can these differences be explained? ISTR Conference, Siena

  3. What we have… • Lots of data on volunteering, but much less on charitable giving • Several datasets on giving using • Different definitions of philanthropy • Different questionnaire modules to measure philanthropy • Different survey methods ISTR Conference, Siena

  4. We’re in big trouble. • How many people report donations to various causes varies from one dataset to another. • Even differences in giving within the same country vary from one dataset to another. • Finally, differences between countries are explained by different variables in the two datasets. ISTR Conference, Siena

  5. ISTR Conference, Siena

  6. What now? • Let’s start all over again. • And do it better. ISTR Conference, Siena

  7. Prospects for Data Access • Tax data: legal definitions, thresholds, privacy issues • Survey data on corporate philanthropy difficult to gather • Foundations even more difficult to get access to • Getting survey data on households least problematic  let’s do this! ISTR Conference, Siena

  8. What we need… • New data on giving, using: • A clear definition of philanthropy. • A validated, cross-nationally adequate instrument to measure philanthropy. • One single method of data collection; online is the only feasible option. ISTR Conference, Siena

  9. ISTR Conference, Siena

  10. Definitions • Should be operationalized. • Definitions should identify a clearly delimited set of phenomena • Easy way out: • Exclude memberships and fees. • Exclude informal giving. • Avoid the word ‘voluntary’. ISTR Conference, Siena

  11. Conceptual model ISTR Conference, Siena

  12. The questionnaire should identify • Units of analysis: individuals, AND/OR households, OR foundations, OR corporations • Channels: churches, charities, foundations, other nonprofit organizations • Destinations: causes and services • Resources: money, goods, labor ISTR Conference, Siena

  13. European Social Survey E1-12 a) CARD 43 For each of the voluntary organisations I will now mention, please use this card to tell me whether any of these things apply to you now or in the last 12 months, and, if so, which. E1-12 b) Do you have personal friends within this organisation? ISTR Conference, Siena

  14. WARNING DATA FROM THESE MEASURES MAY BE *VERY FAR* FROM THE LIKELY TRUE VALUES ISTR Conference, Siena

  15. Questionnaires on household giving • The Gold Standard: the ‘Method + Area Module’ (e.g., GINPS) • Incomplete coverage: ‘Area’ (ESS2002, EB 62.2) • Severely limited: (Very) ‘Short’ • “Methodology is Destiny”: shorter questionnaires yield (strong) underestimates of giving volume and bias parameter estimates Source: Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2006). ‘To Give or Not to Give…That’s the Question’. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35 (3): 533‐540. ISTR Conference, Siena

  16. Donors per sector (%) ISTR Conference, Siena

  17. Donors per sector in the Netherlands in two data sources (%) ISTR Conference, Siena

  18. PhilanthropyEuropean Social Survey, 2002 ISTR Conference, Siena

  19. Giving is under-reported in the ESS Cross tabulation of ESS direct question on political giving and marking ‘donated’ for ‘political party’ in the matrix question (US+NL) ISTR Conference, Siena

  20. Correlates of giving Coefficients in bold are significantly different from each other (p<.05) ISTR Conference, Siena

  21. What we don’t know… • How are France, Germany, Italy, Denmark, Switzerland doing? • How much is donated to charity? • How do countries differ in the composition of philanthropy? • How do countries differ in the characteristics of donors? • Where do all these country differences come from? ISTR Conference, Siena

  22. PhilanthropyEuroBarometer 62.2, 2004 ISTR Conference, Siena

  23. Donors per sector in the Netherlands in two data sources (%) ISTR Conference, Siena

  24. Giving is likely to be overreported in EB • 5% report giving to a ‘political party or organization’; but only 2.5% is a member and only a fraction donate • 40% report giving to an environmental organization; at best, 28% is a member • Humanitarian aid is way too high (41%) ISTR Conference, Siena

  25. Correlates of giving Coefficients in bold are significantly different from each other (p<.05) ISTR Conference, Siena

  26. Why do countries differ? ISTR Conference, Siena

  27. What we want… • Giving Europe, using: • A clear definition of philanthropy. • A validated, cross-nationally adequate instrument to measure philanthropy, based on GINPS. • One single method of data collection; online is the only feasible option. ISTR Conference, Siena

  28. Thanks, says René Bekkers Head of Research Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam r.bekkers@vu.nl Twitter: @renebekkers http://renebekkers.wordpress.com ISTR Conference, Siena

  29. Correlates of giving ISTR Conference, Siena

  30. Volunteering European Social Survey, 2002 ISTR Conference, Siena

More Related