180 likes | 375 Views
Partnership between:. 2 private non-profitsThe Arc of the PiedmontPiedmont Housing Alliance1 Public Housing Authority Charlottesville Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The Arc of the Piedmont's Role. Technical assistance throughout the processStaffing of application centersTranslation s
E N D
1. Mainstream Housing Vouchers in Virginia’s Thomas Jefferson Planning District
2. Partnership between: 2 private non-profits
The Arc of the Piedmont
Piedmont Housing Alliance
1 Public Housing Authority
Charlottesville Housing and Redevelopment Authority
3. The Arc of the Piedmont’s Role Technical assistance throughout the process
Staffing of application centers
Translation services
Sensitivity and skills training
4. Piedmont Housing Alliance’s Role Funding application
Program application process
Focus groups
Advertising
Financial management
Cutting checks
Preparing budget
Overall coordination
5. Charlottesville Housing Redevelopment Authority’s Role Administrative plan
Application processing
Eligibility verification
Managing waiting list
Rent calculations
Housing inspections
Voucher issuance and briefing
Educating landlords
6. Timeline October 2001 – 100% Leased Up
July 2000 – Lease-up begun
June 2000 – Administrative Plan adopted
April 2000 – Began accepting applications March 2000 – Advertised and mailed applications to service agencies
February 2000 – Signed Memorandum of Agreement and held Focus Groups
December 1999 – Notified of Award of 75 vouchers for 5 years
June 1999 – Submitted Application
7. Who is being served?
8. Keys to Success Partnership
75 Vouchers
Outreach to regional community and landlords
Housing Authority expertise
The Arc’s input on hiring CRHA position
Flexible regulatory definitions of eligible housing (congregate, group and shared)
9. Challenges Lack of affordable rental housing
Apartment complexes have income qualifications that Section 8 participants cannot meet
Landlords not accepting vouchers
Lack of accessible housing
HUD resources and guidance
Program implementation
Reporting requirements
Training opportunities in collaboration
10. Reasonable Accommodations Focus groups with advocates and individuals with disabilities
Identified current and potential barriers
Identified possible application sites
Helped spread the word
11. Reasonable Accommodations Preliminary Application
Language and format simplified
Verification not required until later
Pick up or mail
12. Reasonable Accommodations Designated Representative
Permitted to submit application on behalf of individual
Eased obstacles
Transportation
Daytime availability
Discomfort with crowds/unfamiliar locations
13. Reasonable Accommodations Translation/Interpretation services
Available at application site and at any point in process
For persons who have hearing impairment
For persons who have speech difficulties
For persons with cognitive disabilities
14. Reasonable Accommodations Housing Authority staff partnered with advocate staff at each application site
Provided assistance to applicants and accepting staff
15. Reasonable Accommodations Flexible in receipt of completed application
Mailed
Dropped off
Picked up
16. Reasonable Accommodations Applicant and Designated Representative contacted for interview, etc.
To facilitate transportation and other supports
To assist with meeting documentation and timeline requirements
17. Reasonable Accommodations Alternate Forms of documentation accepted to verify age and/or disability
School
Paratransit
Hospital/institution
Community program
18. Reasonable Accommodations Waived face to face interview
Conducted interviews at applicants home/school/work
19. Reasonable Accommodations Administrative Plan extended time applicant had for certain requirements
Allow for greater extension, past 120 days, for individual to find housing if demonstrated need