1 / 27

Leader & Teacher SLTs

The School Leader and Teacher Evaluations work together to set goals and drive daily work to improve educator effectiveness and student outcomes. Aligning with district-wide goals, these evaluations aim to increase student proficiency and readiness for college and career.

kbirch
Download Presentation

Leader & Teacher SLTs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015

  2. The Teacher and Leader Evaluations work together to increase educator effectiveness and student outcomes.

  3. Goals for school leaders should set a vision for what students should be able to accomplish by the year’s end. • Goals for school leaders should: • Tie into your district-wide goals • Drive a leader’s daily work • Align to teachers’ goals • Help students be college and career ready

  4. District Goals • Increase the percentage of students scoring proficient on iLEAP/LEAP to 63% (grades 3 – 8). • Decrease the percentage of students in grades 1 – 3 who are intensive on Dibels to 10%. • Increase the percentage of students scoring Good or Excellent on EOC tests to 58%. • Increase the percentage of students scoring 18 or higher on the ACT to 50%. • Increase the opportunities for Middle School Students to earn a minimum of 3 Carnegie Units • Measure of Professional Practice: NIET Rubric- Increase the consistency of scoring of Teacher Evaluations across the district • SLT’s: Increase the rigor and consistency of Leader and Teacher SLT’s across the district aligned to resources that will improve student mastery • Measure of Student Outcomes: Student Growth Measures-Increase the performance of students across the district

  5. Leader slts

  6. General Format for SLTs _____% of students will score ________ (however proficient is defined: Basic or above, Good or Excellent, 80% or higher, etc.) ____% of students who scored below proficient will improve one achievement level. (however achievement levels are defined)

  7. Grades K-2 schools (examples for C school): • Option 1: • One based on percentage of students who score Basic or above on the End of Year District Benchmark Test in ELA. • Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test in ELA, 69% of the students will score Basic or above. • One based on percentage of students who score Basic or above on the End of Year District Benchmark Test in mathematics. • Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test in mathematics, 56% of the students will score Basic or above.

  8. Grades K-2 schools (examples for C school): • Option 2: • One based on percentage of students who score Basic or above on the End of Year District Benchmark Test in ELA and mathematics. • Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test in ELA and mathematics, 63% of the students will score Basic or above. • One based on percentage of students who were below Basic on Test 1 who increase their percent correct by 25% or more on the District Benchmark Test 3 in ELA and mathematics. • Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Tests in ELA and mathematics, 50% of the students who were below Basic will increase their percentage correct by 25% or more from Benchmark Test 1 to Test 3.

  9. Options for Assistants in K-2 • Divide goals by grade and/or subject • One could have all ELA and the other all math • One could have all of one or two grades (both ELA and math) • Divide by whole school goal and intervention goal (50% or more). • Divide the whole school goal with one on ELA and the other on math • Divide the intervention goal with one on ELA and the other on math.

  10. Grades 3-8 schools (examples for C school): • Option 1: • One based on percentage of students who score Basic or above on the ELA and math District Benchmark Test. • Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test in ELA and math, 62% of the students will score Basic or above. • One based on percentage of students who score Basic or above on the Science and Social Studies Leap or iLeap test. • Example: On the Spring 2014 Leap and/or iLeap tests in science and social studies, 62% of the students will score Basic or above.

  11. Grades 3-8 schools (examples for C school): • Option 2: • One based on percentage of students who score Basic or above on the ELA and math District Benchmark Test and the Science and Social Studies Leap/iLeap. • Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test in ELA and math and the Spring 2014 Leap/iLeap tests in science and social studies, 62% of the students will score Basic or above. • One based on percentage of students below Basic who improve one achievement level on the district benchmark test or Leap/iLeap test from the previous year. • Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Tests in ELA and mathematics and the Leap/iLeap in social studies and science 50% or more of the students who were below Basic will move up one achievement level from their previous year’s level.

  12. Options for Assistants in 3-8 • Divide goals by grade and/or subject • One could have all ELA and social studies and the other all math and science. • One could have all of one or two grades (all subjects) • Divide by whole school goal and intervention goal (50% or more). • Divide the whole school goal with one on ELA and social studies and the other on math and science. • Divide the intervention goal with one on ELA and social studies and the other on math and science.

  13. Example Principal On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grades K-5 in ELA and math, 61% of the students will score Basic or above. Assistant 2 Assistant 1 On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grades 3-5 in ELA and math, 60% of the students will score Basic or above. On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grades K-2 in ELA and math, 62% of the students will score Basic or above. 5th Grade Teacher On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grade 5 in ELA and math, 63% of the students will score Basic or above. 4th Grade Teacher On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grade 4 in ELA and math, 60% of the students will score Basic or above. 3rd Grade Teacher On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grade 3 in ELA and math, 57% of the students will score Basic or above. 2nd Grade Teacher On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grade 2 in ELA and math, 62% of the students will score Basic or above. 1st Grade Teacher On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grade 1 in ELA and math, 62% of the students will score Basic or above. Kindergarten Teacher On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for Kindergarten in ELA and math, 62% of the students will score Basic or above.

  14. Grades 9-12 Schools(examples for C Schools) • One must be based on percentage of students scoring Good or Excellent on all of the EOC tested subjects. • Example: On the Spring 2014 EOC tests, 53% of the students will score good or excellent. • One must be based on having a certain percentage of Seniorsscore 18 or higher on the ACT by April 2014. • Example: By April of 2014 53% of seniors will have a score of 18 or higher on the ACT.

  15. 9-12 Options for Assistants • Goals around the 4 parts of the SPS • Graduation index • AP, IB, IBC, dual enrollment, etc. • Graduation rate • On track graduation rate, credit recovery, etc. • EOC • Could be divided by subject clusters (use rates for each subject from the charts) • ACT • Could be divided by component scores • Could focus on improvement from Explore, Plan, and ACT (progress points – should use 30% or more for goal)

  16. School Leaders and Teachers will set their Student Learning Target Goals using District created charts based on previous year’s data (when available)See charts on upcoming slides.

  17. Suggested Scale for other non-tested grades and subjects Percent of students who score “proficient” • D or F schools:  70% • C schools:  80% • B schools:  90% • A schools:  100% *based on the ideathat A schools are expected to have 100% of their students proficient. Adjustments can be made based on academic and non-academic courses and baseline data. When there are no proficiency levels assigned, proficient will be defined as 80% or higher.

  18. Formula for Achievement Rangeswith 70% as the Goal Insufficient Attainment is any result below Partial Attainment. (1 point) Below 54% Partial Attainment is a range from 15% below the target to just below the actual SLT. (2 points) 54%-69% START HERE: Full Attainment is a range from the actual SLT up to 15% above the target. (3 points) 70% - 85% Exceptional Attainment is any result above the Full Attainment range. This range should represent more than a year’s worth of growth. (4 points) Above 85%

  19. Example Scoring Range with 53%as the goal. (student population 1,200) 53% - 68% (636-816 students) score Basic or above 69% or more (817 or more students) score Basic or above less than 37% (455 or less students) score Basic or above. 37% - 52% (456-635 students) score Basic or above -15% from goal +15% from goal • For goals that are 70% or higher, spilt the difference between Full and Exceptional. • Include number and percent in goals.

  20. Teacher SLTs • Step 1: The school leader sets goals and provides guidance to teachers regarding assessments and goals to use. • Goals shouldbe set using district recommended assessments when available and/or using the same assessments that the leader used to set their goals. • When district or state createdassessments are not available or the leader goals do not include the content of the course (i.e. physical education), goals must be set using the most rigorous and reliable assessments available. • A teacher made test should not be used as the posttest when other assessments are available (see assessment chart). • When possible, one goal should be for all of the students a teacher teachers and the other goal should focus on moving lower performing students to proficient (Basic or Good).

  21. Student Learning TargetsDue Dates September 19: Principal Deadline for approval October 17: Draft due to evaluator October 31: Teacher Deadline for entering into CIS and being approved by evaluator

  22. Resources District SLT website (C&I Webpage): http://www.tangischools.org//site/Default.aspx?PageID=17531

More Related