1 / 18

CFT Occupancy dependence on Beam Luminosity

CFT Occupancy dependence on Beam Luminosity. David Lam Oct 2003. CFT Occupancy vs. Luminosity. Choose 3 classes of events for the study: Zero-biased triggered Minimum-biased triggered Jet triggered – JT_45TT specifically

keaton
Download Presentation

CFT Occupancy dependence on Beam Luminosity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CFT Occupancy dependence on Beam Luminosity David Lam Oct 2003

  2. CFT Occupancy vs. Luminosity • Choose 3 classes of events for the study: • Zero-biased triggered • Minimum-biased triggered • Jet triggered – JT_45TT specifically • Events with delivered luminosity range from 6E30 to ~40E30 (cm-2 s-1) • Two set of events: • Set 1: 10 events between Feb and Mar 2003 • Set 2: 11 events in August (just before the shutdown)

  3. Method • Use a modified version of cft_offline_mon • Use D0TriggerFilter to pick out the desired events • Since most of the reconstructed events are still generated using p13, we used raw data instead to get rid of the 20 ADC cut • Plot average occupancy vs. the middle point of the delivered luminosity range.

  4. Occupancy distribution

  5. Results • Fitting results show occupancies increased with luminosity as expected • Top line: Jet triggered • Middle line: Min-biased triggered • Bottom line: Zero-biased triggered • MC min-biased and zero-biased events are also included. • When extrapolated, at 200E30, jet triggered occupancy is approximately: 0.233 (CFTX 1)

  6. Events between Feb. and Mar.

  7. Events in Aug (before shutdown)

  8. Result • Zero-biased events triggered on beam crossing: • Contain mostly electronic background “noise” • Occupancy variation due to p/anti-p halo • Min-based events triggered on collision: • Signal in luminosity monitors above threshold on both ends • Number of collision increases with luminosity – Poisson distribution • Supposedly, occupancies increase faster with luminosity compared to zero-biased event. • But, slopes for the fits of min-biased events are lower than zero-biased and jet triggered – so dig deeper….

  9. Trigger luminosity • Look into the recorded luminosity for each event • Recorded luminosity are stored by luminosity block (lbn), which usually corresponds to time interval of 1 minute. • Plot occupancy vs. record luminosity for each trigger

  10. Zero-biased Events (Set 1)

  11. Zero-biased Events (Set 2)

  12. Result (cont.) • Both set of zero-biased events have positive dependencies on luminosity • However, for set 1 min-biased events, some funny looking structure in the plot • Set 2 min-biased events have occupancies DECREASE with increasing luminosity

  13. Min-biased Events (Set 1)

  14. Min-biased Events (Set 2)

  15. Jet triggered Events (Set 1)

  16. Jet triggered Events (Set 2)

  17. Jet-triggered events recorded luminosity distribution Set 2 Set 1

  18. Jet triggered result • Set 1 jet triggered occupancies increase with increasing luminosity in range 0 – 900 ub-1 • But set 2 occupancies DECREASE with increasing luminosity in range 0 – 150 ub-1 • Why the range of recorded luminosity differed? Given that the delivered luminosity range are the same in both sets. • Comments? Suggestions?

More Related