1 / 25

“How Re-Dos and Corrections Can Improve Your Teaching”

“How Re-Dos and Corrections Can Improve Your Teaching”. Chris Cannon Sandy Creek High School Fayette County. Agenda. Initial impressions Semantics? Definitions Why do it at all? Research Personal experience College?Real life? I’m interested, how do I do it? Personal examples

Download Presentation

“How Re-Dos and Corrections Can Improve Your Teaching”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. “How Re-Dos and Corrections Can Improve Your Teaching” Chris Cannon Sandy Creek High School Fayette County

  2. Agenda • Initial impressions • Semantics? • Definitions • Why do it at all? • Research • Personal experience • College?Real life? • I’m interested, how do I do it? • Personal examples • Examples from the field • Examples from the room? • Questions/Concerns

  3. Initial Impressions • Word association: • Mistake • Formative • Re-do • Correction

  4. How will allowing students to correct their work make me a better teacher?

  5. Semantics? • Redos, retakes, retests, and corrections have slightly different meanings in some situations • Cannon’s distinction: • Redo: a complete revision of an assignment/section, usually starting from the beginning of the assignment • Corrections: making changes to specific components of an assignment • BOTH REQUIRE EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK!

  6. What, Exactly AM I Talking About? • Making corrections to assignments • Re-Doing assignments • Re-Taking tests in some cases • Re-Writing papers OR doing multiple drafts • Re-Explaining Content in a new/different way

  7. Why do it at all? • Research indicates several positive effects: • Increased student motivation (McManus 2011) • Provides a sense of “hope” to lower achieving students (Judson 2007) • Follows research on how the brain works • We don’t “learn from mistakes”, we learn from CORRECTING mistakes! (Miller, 2009) • Neurons that are active during positive reinforcement linger longer than those active during negative reinforcement (wrong answers)

  8. Why do it at all? • Common in other content areas • English teachers encourage multiple versions of tests • Many math teachers have re-do policies to encourage multiple exposure to content

  9. Why do it at all? • College? • Syracuse survey of 300 college professors found many (68%) did not have a written policy, but were open to the idea if a student initiated the idea • Evidence of some type of redo policy on college syllabi (cursory search) • UGA, GSU, Georgia Southern, Clayton State, Macon State, Young Harris, LSU, Auburn

  10. Why do it at all • Real World? • Pilot coming in for a wrong landing? • Ever mis-checked a box on a form or mis-calculated something on taxes? • Do farmers grow everything correctly the first time? • Ever changed a lesson or activity based on experience? • New Coke anyone? • Traveler’s insurance claim reviews

  11. Why do it at all • Real World? • IBM study of 1,500 CEOs listed “creativity” as the asset they value most in an employee • People who take balanced risks and learn from mistakes were most valued in 2009 (IBM study here)

  12. Why do it at all • Other personal observations: • Fewer incidences of cheating • Improved test scores (studying now) • Students are more interested in understanding WHY they are making the mistakes they are making • Most commonly referenced thing on my end of year surveys

  13. What does it Look like? • Performance Task examples…

  14. Student Example – Original Answer Interdependence My feedback: *Keiria, this is a great start, but you are missing the actual language associated with interdependence. How do these actions relate to consequences, both intended and unintended? • If the government forces Barnes & Noble to set a price ceiling, the government is telling them to sell below the equilibrium price. Because of the low prices on books, the demand for books increases. The price ceiling would cause a shortage since the store is not able to supply the books as quickly with such great demand. • If the government forces Barnes & Noble to set a price floor, the government is assigning them to sell above the equilibrium price. When consumers see the high prices , demand decreases for books. The price floor causes a surplus since consumers aren’t buying the books because of the high prices.

  15. Student Example – Corrected answer Corrections Cont. • Graphs corrected on paper • Slide 9&10- If the government forces Barnes & Noble to set a price ceiling, the intended consequence is to lower prices for the buyers. The unintended consequence is the price ceiling would cause a shortage since the store is not able to supply the books as quickly with such great demand. • If the government forces Barnes & Noble to set a price floor, the intended consequence is increased profits for the sellers . The unintended consequence is the price floor causes a surplus since consumers aren’t buying the books because of the high prices.

  16. My Experience: Tests and Quizzes • Day after tests, students can correct multiple choice questions pursuant to a couple of rules • They must finish these sentences: My answer is wrong because… & The correct answer is ___ because… • Usually allow for open note, but NO partners and no book. They can only correct using material THEY created • At any point, students can take an alternate version of any test or quiz • May be a different version or oral or essay

  17. My Experience: Projects • Anything with a rubric may be re-submitted up to 2 times • Students must either submit a “correction letter” or contact me via e-mail or personal contact to explain what they did differently and why • In AP classes, I assign deadlines, in regular classes I am more flexible, but usually require corrections to be made before the EOCT

  18. My Experience: Other assignments • No corrections on any book assignments or vocab quizzes • Any corrections on group assignments have to be made individually

  19. Ok, I’m interested, now what? • Clarify your policy • What can be corrected? • Tests only? Projects only? Writing assignments? All assignments? • Are corrections “allowed” or “required?” • Grade improvement • Full credit? Half credit? • Steps to correct • Random submission? Parent signature on original? Meeting with you? Pre-written correction sheet? Steps same for all assignments? How long do students have? • AT TEACHER’S DISCRETION!!!!! (Wormeli)

  20. Ok, I’m interested, now what? • Learn from peers • Let your students in on the process • Don’t try it all at once! • Try it with one assignment and above all, GIVE IT A CHANCE TO WORK!

  21. IN house examples? • Experiences with redos? • Wormeli video

  22. How will allowing students to correct their work make me a better teacher? • Ideally, you will focus on “learning” more than “grading” • You will give your students an opportunity to improve, something they DO get in the real world • Your will motivate your students to do improve themselves • You will build a class culture where students will want to know WHY things are wrong

  23. Questions? Comments? • Powerpointposted to www.teachercannon.com under “Teacher Resources” • cannon.chris@mail.fcboe.org or • chris@georgiatestpractice.com

  24. References • Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21 (1), 5-33. • Coyne, M. D., Kame'enui, E. J., & Carnine, D. W. (2007). Effective Teaching Strategies That Accomodate Diverse Learners (3rd Edition ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. • Judson, E. (2007). Retaking a High Stakes Mathematics Test: Examination of School Inverventions and Environments. American Secondary Education, 36 (1), 15-30. • McManus, J. (2011). "Retests": A better method of test corrections. Physics Teacher, 49 (2), 121-122. • Stiggins, R. (2007). Assessment Through The Student's Eyes. Educational Leadership, 64 (8), 22-26. • Stiggins, R., & DuFour, R. (2009). Maximizing the Power of Formative Assessments. Phi Delta Kappan, 90 (9), 640-644.

More Related