1 / 1

Recognised as an “Outstanding” provider No significant areas of under-performance

NEW CHALLENGES, NEW CHANCES : PROPOSALS FOR INTERVENTION . Recognised as an “Outstanding” provider No significant areas of under-performance No areas of concern about financial health or controls Positive learner, employer & community views Good contractual compliance.

keely
Download Presentation

Recognised as an “Outstanding” provider No significant areas of under-performance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NEW CHALLENGES, NEW CHANCES : PROPOSALS FOR INTERVENTION • Recognised as an “Outstanding” provider • No significant areas of under-performance • No areas of concern about financial health or controls • Positive learner, employer & community views • Good contractual compliance • Recognised a “Good” or “Satisfactory” provider, but with positive capacity to improve • No significant areas of underperformance • No areas of concern over financial health or controls • Positive learner, employer & community views • Good contractual compliance • Recognised “Satisfactory” but “Inadequate” capacity to improve • Underperformance identified and/or evidence of giving only mediocre service • Neutral/balanced learner, employer & community views (confirms mediocre view) • Concerns about financial health and/or controls • Contractual compliance considered “adequate” • Recognised as inadequate • Significant areas of, or whole provider underperformance. • History of poor performance • Significant areas of financial health and/or concerns over controls • Significant concern that unlikely to recover within 3yrs; • Evidence of fraud/ mismanagement • Drop/significant drop in enrolment • Concerns over contract compliance INDICATORS PERFORMANCE CATEGORY • Clear notification issued of areas where improvement has not been realised • Notification covers intention to cease funding • Plans prepared to protect interests of learners • Support given via LSIS Improvement Advisory Service (for transition to new arrangements) • Steps taken for removal of funding • Strategic options review undertaken • Use of in extremis intervention powers • No interventions/inspection • Proportionate performance monitoring (to ensure rating maintained) • Annual self assessment conducted and available for review if requested • Peer review conducted • Provider offers support to others • Inspected on 4yr cycle, plus post inspection action planning and monitoring • Clear indication given of areas of weakness (covering quality and/or finance) and timescales for expected improvements • Enhanced performance monitoring – especially financial health • Case conferences conducted • Support available – peer/LSIS Improvement Advisory Service (imposed where warranted) • Impact of support reviewed to ensure improvements realised • Early consideration of ‘strategic options review’ where ‘recovery’ doubted • Inspected on 6yr cycle • Proportionate performance monitoring / risk assessment (to ensure rating maintained) • Annual self assessment conducted and available for review if requested • Peer review conducted INTERVENTION

More Related