190 likes | 475 Views
Lecture 19: Frequency Response. Prof. Niknejad. Lecture Outline. Finish: Emitter Degeneration Frequency response of the CE and CS current amplifiers Unity-gain frequency T Frequency response of the CE as voltage amp The Miller approximation. Typical “Discrete” Biasing.
E N D
Lecture 19:Frequency Response Prof. Niknejad
Lecture Outline • Finish: Emitter Degeneration • Frequency response of the CE and CS current amplifiers • Unity-gain frequency T • Frequency response of the CE as voltage amp • The Miller approximation University of California, Berkeley
Typical “Discrete” Biasing • A good biasing scheme must be relatively insensitive to transistor parameters (vary with process and temperature) • In this scheme, the base current is given by: • The emitter current: University of California, Berkeley
Gain for “Discrete” Design • Let’s derive it by intuition • Input impedance can be made large enough by design • Device acts like follower, emitter=base • This signal generates a collector current Can be made large to couple All of source to input (even with RS) University of California, Berkeley
CE Amplifier with Current Input Find intrinsic current gain by driving with infinite source impedance and Zero load impedance… University of California, Berkeley
Short-Circuit Current Gain Small-signal short circuit (could be a DC voltage source) Pure input current (RS = 0 ) Substitute equivalent circuit model of transistor and do the “math” University of California, Berkeley
Small-Signal Model: Ai Note that ro, Ccs play no role (shorted out) University of California, Berkeley
Phasor Analysis: Find Ai KCL at the output node: KCL at the input node: Solve for V : University of California, Berkeley
Phasor Analysis for Ai (cont.) Substituting for V Substituting for Z =r || (1/jC) University of California, Berkeley
Short-Circuit Current Gain Transfer Function Transfer function has one pole and one zero: Note: Zero Frequency much larger than pole: University of California, Berkeley
Magnitude Bode Plot pole Unity current gain 0 dB zero University of California, Berkeley
Transition Frequency T Dependence on DC collector current: Base Region Transit Time! Limiting case: University of California, Berkeley
Common Source Amplifer: Ai(j) DC Bias is problematic: what sets VGS? University of California, Berkeley
CS Short-Circuit Current Gain Transfer function: University of California, Berkeley
MOS Unity Gain Frequency • Since the zero occurs at a higher frequency than pole, assume it has negligible effect: Performance improves like L^2 for long channel devices! For short channel devices the dependence is like ~ L^1 Time to cross channel University of California, Berkeley
Miller Impedance • Consider the current flowing through an impedance Z hooked up to a “black-box” where the voltage gain from terminal to the other is fixed (as you can see, it depends on Z) University of California, Berkeley
Miller Impedance • Notice that the current flowing into Z from terminal 1 looks like an equivalent current to ground where Z is transformed down by the Miller factor: • From terminal 2, the situation is reciprocal University of California, Berkeley
Miller Equivalent Circuit Note: • We can “de-couple” these terminals if we can calculate the gain Av across the impedance Z • Often the gain Av is weakly depedendent on Z • The approximation is to ignore Z, calculate A, and then use the decoupled miller caps University of California, Berkeley