1 / 8

INCAPACITATION AND REPLACEMENT OF SENIOR CABIN CREW MEMBERS

INCAPACITATION AND REPLACEMENT OF SENIOR CABIN CREW MEMBERS. Presentation to OST 29 November 2005. BACKGROUND. JAA received enquiries as to interpretation Working Paper produced Identified information in different areas Possible to misinterpret Could lead to non-compliance. BACKGROUND.

keisha
Download Presentation

INCAPACITATION AND REPLACEMENT OF SENIOR CABIN CREW MEMBERS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INCAPACITATION AND REPLACEMENT OF SENIOR CABIN CREW MEMBERS Presentation to OST 29 November 2005

  2. BACKGROUND • JAA received enquiries as to interpretation • Working Paper produced • Identified information in different areas • Possible to misinterpret • Could lead to non-compliance

  3. BACKGROUND • OST tasked Cabin Crew Steering Group to produce material • Discussed at CCSG 05-3 • Draft NPA produced

  4. RIA • Purpose – no misinterpretation • Options – adoption or rejection • Impacts • No impact on those who comply • Possible commercial and financial impact on those that do not

  5. SUMMARY • Ensure clarification and standardisation between NAA’s • Enhance flight safety • Allow flexibility in exceptional circumstances

  6. TEXT PROPOSAL • JAR-OPS 1.1000 Senior cabin crew members (d) • Insert additional sentence • This shall only be permitted for one sector and only from an aerodrome where standby cabin crew are not normally available.

  7. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION • WP also required clarification for ‘replacement’ • Discussed by the CCSG • Not included in NPA • Possible significant cost implication • Not practical for small operators

  8. JAR-OPS 1.990 • Recent query regarding reduction of cabin crew below minimum required • Industrial action or sickness • Appropriate to include similar requirement in 1.990?

More Related