1 / 19

Economics for CED

Economics for CED. Noémi Giszpenc Spring 2004 Lecture 9: Macro: International Trade June 2, 2004. Why trade among nations?. Why not practice self-sufficiency? Mercantilists (17 th & 18 th C.): if you can export more than you import, that creates jobs in your country and

keithw
Download Presentation

Economics for CED

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Economics for CED Noémi GiszpencSpring 2004Lecture 9: Macro: International Trade June 2, 2004

  2. Why trade among nations? • Why not practice self-sufficiency? • Mercantilists (17th & 18th C.): if you can export more than you import, that • creates jobs in your country and • Gives you gold reserves to pay mercenaries • Free-traders (late 18th & 19th C.): • Because trade is mutually beneficial: • Creates larger markets, which means more division of labor--more specialization--therefore more production, and higher real incomes. • David Ricardo: theory of comparative advantage Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  3. David Ricardo(1772-1823) Comparative advantage • Best understood using a numerical example: • 2 countries: England and Portugal • 2 goods: wine and cloth • Portugal takes fewer man-hours to produce both: • Opportunity cost of cloth in Portugal is 3 barrels wine • Opportunity cost of cloth in England is 2 barrels wine Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  4. England and Portugal trade • England exports cloth to Portugal: • At Portuguese prices, each roll of cloth buys 3 barrels of wine • In England a roll of cloth is worth only 2 barrels • Portugal exports wine to England: • At English prices, a barrel of wine buys half a roll of cloth • In Portugal a barrel is worth only 1/3 roll of cloth • Thus, Portuguese get cloth cheaper by producing wine to trade for cloth than by producing cloth at home • despite the fact that they can produce more cloth per unit of labor than the English can. Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  5. Trade with comparative advantage • Prices will probably be somewhere between two extremes: say, 2.5 rolls of cloth per barrel of wine • At these prices, both countries still better off with trade than without • Key point: England has a comparative advantage in cloth • Even though Portugal has the absolute advantage in both goods. • Relative price of cloth (in wine) is less in England. Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  6. Realistic qualifications • David Ricardo believed in the Labor Theory of Value--that “natural” prices derived from amount of labor. • Prices depend on at least 3 factors of production: land, labor, capital • Still, different countries have different resource endowments, so comparative advantage still holds. • As in other markets, prices determined largely by supply and demand. Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  7. Realistic qualifications (cont.) • Most trade is multi-lateral (among many countries with many goods) not bilateral (2 countries) with only 2 goods • Doesn’t undermine idea of comparative advantage though • Some trade is in roughly similar products • “counter-trade”: Jaguars for Toyotas • Different tastes in different countries can lead to mutually beneficial trades Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  8. Realistic qualifications (cont.) • Monopoly power: • Could make both countries worse off. • Openness to trade could limit monopoly power. • Unemployment • Comparative advantage model assumes full employment • If mercantilist trade policies can promote more employment, policy makers face dilemma: • Will the country be better off with trade according to comparative advantage, which is efficient? • or are more, inefficient jobs better than no jobs at all? Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  9. Realistic qualifications (cont.) • Static or dynamic? • In model, poorer country is better off from trade, but remains relatively poor • This is because improving productivity is outside of the model Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  10. What Herman Daly says • One of the unmentioned assumptions of the model is that both labor and capital are moored to their respective nations. • Under such conditions, comparative advantage takes over. • But with mobile capital, only absolute advantage matters. • Capital picks up and moves to more productive locale--in the example’s case, Portugal. Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  11. How does money flow? • Often needs to change from one monetary unit to another • Like other exchanges, the relative prices of national moneys are determined by supply and demand • People in one country demand units of foreign countries to buy foreign goods • (and to make gobs of money speculating) • So demand for currency is related to demand for real goods and services. • (and to different interest rates paid) Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  12. 2 ways of determining FX rates • Purchasing Power Parity • Assumption: if goods cost different amounts in different countries, arbitrage will whittle down the differences • Interest Rate Parity • Assumption: if different currencies earn different rates of return, exchange rates will adjust to reflect differential demands Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  13. Purchasing Power Parity • Say basket of goods in country A costs pAy • Same basket of goods in country B costs pBy • So pAy/pBy = pA/pB should = EA/B • Say pA goes up: EA/B goes up, meaning more A for every B: a devaluation of A relative to B. • What causes changes in pA? • Inflation • Changes in productivity • Changes in E from other causes Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  14. Problems with PPP theory • Transportation costs and trade restrictions • Costs of Non-Tradable Inputs • Such as rent • Perfect information • Needed for effective arbitrage • Other market participants • PPP is about goods. Total world trade is approx. $100 billion/day. Activity on the FX market is approx. $1 trillion/day. What else is going on? Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  15. Interest Rate Parity • Say interest rate in country A is iA. • After one year’s investment, A1 A(1+iA) • Where A is the symbol of A’s currency; B is B’s currency. • Say interest rate in country B is iB, and the exchange rate is EA/B. • If you converted A1 B(1/EA/B), after one year’s investment you’d get B(1/EA/B (1 + iB)). • If the exchange rate in one year is EA/B*, then you could get back AEA/B*(1/EA/B (1 + iB)) • Which, if the rates of return are equal for both investments, ought to be equal to A(1+iA). Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  16. Rearranging… • You obtain: • Where iA is rate of return on investment in country A; RHS is return on investment in B. • Shows that the expected rate of return on the asset from country B depends on two things: • interest rate in country B, and • the expected percentage change in the value of B • If B appreciates, rate of return is higher--so investors would be willing to accept a lower interest rate. Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  17. EA/B SB DB QB How are FX rates determined? • Supply and Demand for B: • If B appreciates (EA/B rises), holders of B more willing to sell; holders of A less willing to buy B. • Say FX market is in equilibrium. Now say iA goes up. What happens? Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  18. EA/B SB DB QB Effect of interest rates on FX • If iA goes up, rate of return on holding A goes up. • Sellers more willing to sell B for A. • Buyers less willing to buy B--prefer to hold on to A. • EA/B falls to new equilibrium • A appreciates relative to B • Rate of return now equal. Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

  19. Effect of expectations on FX • Say investors raise their expected future exchange rate, E*. • This will raise the rate of return on holding B. • Sellers will want to sell less B • Buyers will want to buy more B. • Equilibrium exchange rate rises. • A case of self-fulfilling expectations. EA/B SB DB QB Economics for CED: Lecture 9, Noémi Giszpenc

More Related