1 / 12

PICTURE

PICTURE. PICTURE Resource Centre (PRC) Best Practices for Urban Cultural Tourism Edith Besson Krassimira Paskaleva ITAS – Karlsruhe Research Centre, Germany. Objectives of the Resource Centre.

kelli
Download Presentation

PICTURE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PICTURE PICTURE Resource Centre (PRC) Best Practices for Urban Cultural Tourism Edith Besson Krassimira Paskaleva ITAS – Karlsruhe Research Centre, Germany

  2. Objectives of the Resource Centre To present an inventory of successful cultural tourism strategies in a selection of European cities, aimed to: • Demonstrate practical ways on how CT stakeholders can improve practice; • Help project users to understand how urban governance relates to local contexts; • Disseminate and valorise PICTURE outcomes in user-friendly fashion; • Encourage cities to learn from other successful experiences.

  3. What is a ‘best practice’? We define a cultural tourism best practice as: An experience that has been analysed and valued as such by European or international bodies and/ or scientific sources; BUT ALSO: Innovative initiatives identified as part of PICTURE research (case studies) and partners’ experience from previous projects Exemplary character and level of compliance with PICTURE main criteria for good management of urban cultural tourism

  4. Key sources 1. European and International best practice databases, including: • UN-Habitat Best practices Database • UNECE good practice handbook • EC, DG Enterprise-Tourism Unit studies • EC, Inforegio Success Stories Database • PICTURE resources: • Case studies (e.g. Belfast CT strategy, Avila tourism Observatory, Siracusa integrated territorial project…) • PICTURE partners’ expert experience

  5. PICTURE Criteria and Best Practice Format 1/2 Scale: Historical/ Centre/District/ Urban/Metropolitan/ Regional/ National/ TransnationalStage of tourism development:Beginning/ Growing/ Mature/ DecliningMain objective: Urban and/or regional development/Balanced tourism growth/ Tourism Quality Management/Improve urban quality of life/Destination promotion. Categories of effects: Effects on urban governance Cultural tourism strategy Integrated urban planning Sustainable partnerships Stakeholder participation Steering government Destinations management Regional cooperation Networks of cities Effects on quality of life Built heritage diversity Cultural practices and representations Urban economies Environment Social life, local values and traditions

  6. PICTURE Criteria and Best Practice Format 2/2 41 Best practices are currently available to users in the PICTURE resource centre, and presented following the following format: • A downloadable page from www.picture-project.com / Resource centre section. • Relevant criteria • Best Practice description • Source(s) and/ or contact name • Web Link(s) for additional information

  7. List of Best Practices available in PRC 1/4 Best practice 1: Aire 198. A network of urban areas (Angoulême, Niort, La Rochelle, Poitiers), France. Best Practice 2: Belfast City Council Cultural Tourism Strategy, Northern Ireland, UK Best practice 3:Fidenza Tourism Board, Italy Best practice 4: Tourism Observatory of Avila, Spain. Best practice 5: Beaune, the exceptional role of a tourism office in boosting tourism activity. Best practice 6: ‘First Stop York’ Tourism partnership, UK. Best Practice 7: Calvia Agenda Local 21, Mallorca, Spain. Best Practice 8: The European Cities Tourism (ECT) network. Best practice 9: “European Association of cities along the Via Francigena”. Best practice 10: Provins, decades of realistic tourism strategy, France. Best practice 11: SuVoT project – SUstainable & VOcational Tourism, Interreg IIIC

  8. List of Best Practices available in PRC 2/4 Best practice 12: Cambridge Tourism Forum, UK Best practice 13:“Red de Juderías”, Spain. Best practice 14: URBACT – MEDINT project “Integrated approach in Mediterranean local development” and PICTURE Project: the experience of local forums, Syracuse, Italy. Best practice 15:“Mozart ways”. Best practice 16:Protection and rehabilitation of the archaeological ensemble of Tarragona, Spain Best practice 17:Lucca Strategic Plan, Italy Best practice 18:“The Routes of the Olive Tree” Best practice 19: Developing databases for Historic Tours, English Heritage, UK Best practice 20:Chantilly. Implementation of PPPs in order to manage a private cultural heritage. Best Practice 21:Control and Management of the numbers of visitors in Venice, Italy.

  9. List of Best Practices available in PRC 3/4 Best Practice 22:Managing traffic flows and trying to preserve intangible atmosphere in Bruges, Belgium Best practice 23: Atelier 231 in Sotteville, France Best practice 24:Protection and rehabilitation of the Lorca, Spain Best practice 25:Integrated Territorial Project “Ecomuseum of the Mediterranean”, Syracuse, Italy Best practice 26: Ornans, a city in an obvious cultural network, France. Best practice 27: “El legado andalusí”, Spain. Best practice 28:Fougères, the right cultural priority for a tourism development, France Best practice 29: Bergen Tourist Board, Norvay. Best practice 30: Access to Historic Buildings and Landscapes: the English Heritage guidelines Best practice 31: Extremadura regional strategy, Spain Best Practice 32: Regeneration of the Völklingen steelworks site, Germany

  10. List of Best Practices available in PRC 4/4 Best practice 33: Malaga’s URBAN programme to improve resident and tourist services, Spain Best practice 34: Conservation of the Urban Cultural Heritage and Regional Partnerships: The BALCON project, Sweden. Best practice 35: Historic City of Ourense, Spain Best practice 36: Hadrian’s Wall Sustainable Tourism Partnership, United Kingdom. Best practice 37: Protection and rehabilitation of the Historical World Heritage, Santiago, Spain Best practice 38: The Eichsfeld regional strategy, Germany Best practice 39: Pays Cathare, France Best practice 40: Urban I in Rotterdam Best practice 41: Urban I in Bremen, Germany

  11. Types of best practices • Scale*: Historical centres 4, District 4, Urban 19, Metropolitan 1, Regional 7, National 2, Transnational 8 • Stage*: Beginning 10, Growing 15, Mature 15, Declining 3 • Main objective*: urban and/or regional development 22 , Balanced tourism growth 7, Tourism quality management 11, Improve urban quality of life 10, Destination promotion 13. * Some best practice descriptions list more than one criteria, hence the total is not 41

  12. Further steps The Resource Centre will continue to evolve until the end of the PICTURE project! We invite cities and other cultural tourism stakeholders to submit Best Practices Cases to enrich the PRC until December 8, 2006 Contact: edith.besson@itas.fzk.de Thank you very much for your attention!

More Related