60 likes | 155 Views
Proposed Revisions for Updating the Software Guidance in MIL-HDBK-881A: Work Breakdown Structures for Material Items. OUSD(AT&L)/SSE-USC/CSSE Workshop on Integrating Systems and Software Engineering under Competitive Prototyping with the Incremental Commitment Model
E N D
Proposed Revisions for Updating the Software Guidance inMIL-HDBK-881A: Work Breakdown Structures for Material Items OUSD(AT&L)/SSE-USC/CSSE Workshop on Integrating Systems and Software Engineering under Competitive Prototyping with the Incremental Commitment Model Washington, DC, July 14-17, 2008
Overview of Objectives • Existing MIL-HDBK-881a guidance, including Section 3.2.2. and Appendix B, treats software as a component of a subsystem (i.e, third tier WBS item) • ISPAN, NECC, GCSS-A are examples of acquisition programs that, because of stand alone nature of the software content, have had to look beyond MIL-HDBK-881a to development meaningful WBS • MIL-HDBK-881a up for revision • Software Cost Control Working Group objective • Provide a set of recommended changes/updates to improve guidance with respect to software development best practices • Software Cost Control Working Group drafted initial set of recommendations
Task Overview • Revision objectives: • Software neutral • Correct errors • Key modifications in wording: • Replace 'material item' with ' acquisition program' • Add words to make 'artifacts' equal to 'products' • Include words that make 'product-oriented' and 'DoDAF architecture' interchangeable WRT to creating a WBS • Results • Compiled a Comment matrix • Drafted a new Appendix B (Software) • During final review and clean up, the working group was made aware of 90’s effort (draft MIL-HDBK-171)
NDIA Participation • The Software Cost Control working group would like to provide an industry-coordinated set of recommendations • We will be requesting industry members of NDIA review the our suggested changes and provide feedback (i.e., validation): • NDIA review objectives: • Ensure recommended changes are improvements from industry perspective • Request additional changes and refinements within the defined scope • Obtain additional examples to include in Appendix B
Summary/Next Steps • Software Cost Control working group is finishing up internal review results • Incorporation of working group feedback • Drafting an executive summary of need for update • Provide Comment matrix to NDIA WBS (Industry participants) and other identified parties for review and comment by end of July • Collect feedback and consolidate into a single baseline by Mid-September • Submit Comment Matrix to MIL-HDBK-881a custodian (Debbie Tomsic, ARA) by end September
Questions/Discussion Contact Information: Chris Miller SSE/SSA Support Software Engineering & Systems Assurance ODUSD(A&T) Systems & Software Engineering MillerC@syseng-so.com