200 likes | 433 Views
CAER Safety Summit CalARP Audit Trends. Cho Nai Cheung Accidental Release Prevention Engineer, Supervisor Hazardous Materials Programs June 14 th , 2012. Presentation Overview. Facility Audit Trends Audit findings by Program Level Results of Safety Culture Survey
E N D
CAER Safety SummitCalARP Audit Trends Cho Nai Cheung Accidental Release Prevention Engineer, Supervisor Hazardous Materials Programs June 14th, 2012
Presentation Overview • Facility Audit Trends • Audit findings by Program Level • Results of Safety Culture Survey • Impact of Safety Programs
Contra Costa County CalARP Sites • Petroleum Refineries (4) • Swimming Pools (1) • Hazardous Waste Storage Facility (1) • Nox Reduction Pollution Abatement (13) • Chemical Mfg Plants (11) • Water Treatment (11) • Ammonia Refrigeration (8)
Audit Trend • Audit every three years • Track previous actions in new audits • Ensures and Considers • “ensure” actions not the best indicator • Number of ensures over time
PHA (10% overall,13% P2,13% P3) Recommendation tracking, timely Program 3: siting, seismic revalidation, HF, previous incidents, Program 2: revalidation, inspect equipment Operating Procedures (10%,14%.11%) COD, Program 3: S&H information/PPE, certification Program 2: missing procedure for task, shutdown procedure (emergency & normal), start-up Overall CalARP Improvement Areas (2009-2012)
Hazard Assessment (7% overall,11% P2, 9% P3) WCS & ARS background documentation, parameters, OCA update Training (6%, 9%, 7%) Refresher training, Records Program 2: initial training, contractor Program 3: document training was understood Overall CalARP Improvement Areas (2009-2012)
ISO Facilities June 14, 2012
Operating Procedures (14%) COD, S&H information/PPE, certification CSE (13%) Review cancelled permits, permit and conditions, rescue plan PHA (11%) Incidents reviewed, document recommendation & tracking, seismic revalidation MOC (10%) Document training (op & maintenance), MOC for operating procedure, proper authorization ISO: CalARP Areas for Improvement (2009-2012)
Inherently Safer System (21%) PHA recommendations analyzed for ISS categories (I,P,A,P) and approach (m,s,m,s), ISS for new process and guidance Latent Conditions Checklist (13%) Sign-off, feedback, rationale for customization, tracking of training and recommendations Operating Procedures (13%) Evaluating HF, task/gap analysis, procedure writing training Safety Culture (11%) ISO: SP Areas for Improvement (2009-2012)
Safety Culture Survey Results • Completed survey of employees • No of Deficiencies: • Range: 2 – 6 • Average: 3.3 (28%) • Median: 2
Safety Culture Survey Results • Develop metrics (100%) • Milestones in improvement plans (67%) • Various requirements (33%): • Evaluate work groups • Identification of target • Assessment having all required component • Records maintained • Report out to the workforce
Contact Information Cho Nai Cheung Telephone: (925) 335-3212 E-Mail:chonai.cheung@hsd.cccounty.us Website:http://www.cchealth.org/groups/hazmat