1 / 17

A Global-Scale Biofuels Program and its Environmental Consequences

A Global-Scale Biofuels Program and its Environmental Consequences. J. Melillo 1 , A. Gurgel 2 , D. Kicklighter 1 , J. Reilly 2 , T. Cronin 1 , S. Paltsev 2 , B. Felzer 1 , A. Sokolov 2 and X. Wang 2 1 The Ecosystems Center, MBL, Woods Hole, MA

kelvin
Download Presentation

A Global-Scale Biofuels Program and its Environmental Consequences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Global-Scale Biofuels Program and its Environmental Consequences J. Melillo1, A. Gurgel2, D. Kicklighter1, J. Reilly2, T. Cronin1, S. Paltsev2, B. Felzer1, A. Sokolov2 and X. Wang2 1 The Ecosystems Center, MBL, Woods Hole, MA 2 Joint Program on Global Change, MIT, Cambridge MA

  2. A Modeling Study • Using an Integrated Global Systems Model (IGSM) Developed as part of the MIT Joint Program on Global Change • Coupled models within the IGSM • Economic model - a general equilibrium economic model, EPPA (the Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis model) • Atmospheric chemistry model • Reduced form GCM (coupled AOL model) • Terrestrial biogeochemistry model

  3. MIT Integrated Global System Model (IGSM) Prinn et al., 1999, Climatic Change, 41(3/4), 469-546.

  4. http://web.mit.edu/globalchange/www/MITJPSPGC Rpt 146.pdf • Gurgel, A., Reilly, J. & Paltsev, S. J. Agric. Food Industrial Org. 5(2), 1- 34 (2007).

  5. Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM) Melillo et al. 1993, Nature 363: 234-240; Felzer et al. 2004 Tellus, 56B, 230-248

  6. Crop yield

  7. Examples of Simulations • Global-scale simulations – in the context of an interactive global economy • Cellulosic biofuels - in the context of other land-use needs (e.g., croplands, pastures, managed forests) • Climate change policy target – e.g., stabilize [CO2] at 550ppmv, emissions limits prescribed by economic region (total of 16), cap and trade mechanism in place • Primary drivers • Economics (land price, labor costs, etc.) • Policies (e.g., conservation of forested lands)

  8. 2 Land-use Scenarios • Deforestation – all land-cover types can be converted to production to biofuels feedstocks • Intensification – protection of forests receives a high priority

  9. % of grid cell (0.5x0.5o) in biofuels a. Deforestation b. Intensification 0 10 20 40 60 80 100 Percent

  10. Preliminary Simulation Results

  11. Effects of cellulosic biofuels on terrestrial carbon storage up to 2050 a. Deforestation b. Intensification -18-16-8 -4-2-11248 kg C m-2

  12. Carbon loans from land stocks and payback times over the 21st century a) Deforestation b) Intensification

  13. Summary Remarks • Earth’s landscape could be fundamentally reshaped when and if we implement a global biofuels program. Land-use polices that protect specific biomes can have important positive consequences. Irrespective of these policies, however, there will almost certainly be massive biodiversity losses as biomass crops replace natural vegetation at the scale of 14 to 15 million km2. • Release of large amounts of carbon to the atmosphere possible – large enough to affect the climate system – especially if forested land is cleared for biofuel crops. This is like humanity taking a large carbon loan from the biosphere. • Up to about 50% of the annual terrestrial NPP could be co-opted in 2050 due to the expansion of managed lands (currently about 30% is co-opted). • The consequences for ecosystem services of such a large percentage of NPP being co-opted are unknown, but potentially critical. For example, we do not know if we will be crossing thresholds, beyond which the biosphere will function in different ways.

  14. Near-term Challenges • Resource needs and unintended consequences • Nitrogen and N2O production • Water competition among uses • Biodiversity consequences • Social and cultural consequences

  15. Potential Hotspots of Biotic Impoverishment

  16. TEM/EPPA Linkage

More Related