1 / 11

Armed airline pilots

Armed airline pilots. Tony Stark. Background. September 11 th , 2001 Planes hijacked Attacked US buildings New outlook on safety, especially air security. Homeland Security Bill. -November 26,2001

kendis
Download Presentation

Armed airline pilots

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Armed airline pilots Tony Stark

  2. Background • September 11th, 2001 • Planes hijacked • Attacked US buildings • New outlook on safety, especially air security

  3. Homeland Security Bill -November 26,2001 -Established Department of Homeland Security, under DHS, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) -Arming Pilots Against Terrorism Act -Federal Flight Deck Officer Program

  4. FFDO Program • Program which allows specially trained pilots to carry a concealed firearm during flight • Serve as “last line of defense” • Goal: Never allow terrorists to take over aircraft

  5. Two Sides • Those for the FFDO program (believe it is necessary) • Those against the FFDO program (believe it is an unnecessary risk) • Need to find common ground • Everyone shares common goal of safety

  6. Those For the FFDO • Don Young, Chairman of the House of Transportation and Infrastructure Committee: • “…we now face a possible situation where the Department of Defense may be forced to make the difficult decision of having our own Air Force shoot down a plane full of innocent passengers due to a terrorist takeover.” • Far better alternative to taking innocent lives • Do not dispute possible dangers • Application process far to inconvenient

  7. Against the FFDO • Job related stress, not fit for a firearm • Dr. Amy L. Fraher, a Senior Lecturer in Organisation Studies, retired US Navy Commander and Naval aviator, over 6,000 flight hours without a single mishap • “… if the pilot does not accomplish the task, to transport people and cargo safely from one location to another, chances are quite likely they might die trying. Few jobs create stakes this high.” • Misfires in cockpit, produce hole in fuselage, take plane down • Already have Federal Air Marshals

  8. Middle Ground • Clearly a new system needs to be put into place • Have easier application process • Still allow armed pilots • Change would be from firearm to Taser • Much safer, would not have possibility of misfire, still able to control suspect • Allows for questioning of subject by proper authorities once on ground

  9. Works Cited • Department of Homeland Security. "No Fast Draws in the Cockpit." 17 Dec. 2008. Web. 2 Apr. 2012. • Fraher, Amy L. "Flying the Friendly Skies: Why US Commercial Airline Pilots Want to Carry Guns." Human Relations. Sage Publications, 1 May 2004. Web. 02 Apr. 2012 • Paddock, Catharine. "Study Suggests Taser Use By US Police Is Safe." Medical News Today. MediLexiconInternational, 09 Oct. 2007. Web. 02 Apr. 2012. • Wilson Research. LexisNexis. Rep. 15 May 2002. Web. 2 Apr. 2012.

  10. Comments • Overall Comments: Why didn’t you give us this good a treatment of your subject on the page? I found the Presentation a winner, and your Response Team clearly concurs. There’s a viable balance of pros and cons — which takes into account, unlike on the paper, the problem of putting a bullet hole in a plane’s fuselage. There are appropriate visuals and pertinent quotes, from people who count as authorities, attached to each important turn of the argument. Also you handled the business of voice and body language effectively, though I agree with the Team that you rushed at times. The Mediation arrived, in this context, like a logical conclusion, adapting the latest technology to good use. Nice job with the questions too — maybe you have a natural gift for presentation. A or 95.

More Related