1 / 28

HQ structures Working group

Explore design features, FEA results, and synergies of HQ structures for improved cooling. Includes plans for testing coils and incorporating pressure vessel.

kendrickt
Download Presentation

HQ structures Working group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HQ structuresWorking group M. Anerella, D. Bocian, S. Caspi, J. Cozzolino, P. Ferracin, A. Milanese, S. Prestemon November 2, 2010

  2. Outline Paolo Ferracin • Design features and FEA results comparison of the two structures • Possible synergies • Options/plans for testing two coils in the same structure (to check the performance using half-length coils) • Options/plans for a test that will incorporate a pressure vessel over the aluminum shell • Heat transfer calculations and design features for improved cooling

  3. Outline Paolo Ferracin • Design features and FEA results comparison of the two structures • Possible synergies • Options/plans for testing two coils in the same structure (to check the performance using half-length coils) • Options/plans for a test that will incorporate a pressure vessel over the aluminum shell • Heat transfer calculations and design features for improved cooling

  4. HQ structures • HQ LBNL • HQ BNL Paolo Ferracin

  5. Coil-Collar alignment and collar • Aluminum bolted collars • Collars locked by bolts • Key locked from beginning of assembly • Little or no coil stress • No press required • Aluminum keyed collars • Two tapered keys per quadrant • Collar mid-plane closes after keying • Little or no coil stress • Bladders system as “collaring press” Paolo Ferracin

  6. HQ BNLCollaring fixture with new bladders Paolo Ferracin

  7. From collar to shell • Pads – bladders – yoke • Collar-pad alignment: collars nested into pads • Masters and keys to align pad and yoke • Pad and yoke 45° gap always open • Alignment transferred from 45° to mid-plane • Full contact collar-pad • Inner yoke – bladders – outer yoke • Collars - Inner yoke alignment: key - slot • 45° key to align inner yoke to fiducials • Inner and outer yoke mid-plane always open • Alignment always along the 45° axis • Contact collar- inner yoke in the mid-plane Paolo Ferracin

  8. Shell-bladders and room temperature pre-load • One 50 mm bladder per octant • 25 mm thick shell • 45 MPa in bladders to open 0.6 mm • 100 MPa shell tension • 39% of the total force (coming from the shell) intercepted by the collar-key • Two 40 mm wide bladders per octant • 25 mm thick shell • 30 MPa in bladders to open 0.3-0.6-0.8 mm • 125 MPa shell tension Paolo Ferracin

  9. Shell-bladders and room temperature pre-load Pole shim: .79mm Middle shim: .62mm Mid-plane shim: .25 mm Paolo Ferracin HQ BNL

  10. Shell-bladders and room temperature pre-load • Coil peak stress: -93 MPa • Coil peak stress: -120 MPa Paolo Ferracin

  11. Cool-down • Shell stress: 210 MPa • 20% of the total force (coming from the shell) intercepted by the collar-key • Shell stress: +220 MPa Paolo Ferracin

  12. Cool-down • Coil peak stress: -195 MPa • Coil peak stress: -188 MPa Paolo Ferracin

  13. Excitation • Coil horizontal displacement on the mid-plane during excitation • Displacement in the outer radius • From –0.419 mm to -0.372 mm • Delta: +47 micron • Coil horizontal displacement on the mid-plane during excitation • Displacement in the outer radius • From –0.434 mm to -0.330 mm • Delta: +104 micron Paolo Ferracin

  14. Excitation • Coil peak stress: -185 MPa • Coil peak stress: -135 MPa Paolo Ferracin

  15. End support • Stainless steel (Nitronic 40) end plate • 50 mm thick • Aluminum axial rods • 34 mm diameter • Stainless steel end plate 127 mm thick with 12.7 mm ss shell and bullets Paolo Ferracin

  16. Outline Paolo Ferracin • Design features and FEA results comparison of for the two structures • Possible synergies • Options/plans for testing two coils in the same structure (to check the performance using half-length coils) • Options/plans for a test that will incorporate a pressure vessel over the aluminum shell • Heat transfer calculations and design features for improved cooling

  17. Possible synergies Paolo Ferracin • FEM • Same bladders (old or new) • Same collars • shape and dimension • Aluminum segmented shell • LHe vessel • Fiducials • End pre-load

  18. Bladder Development 1 1st bladder design – testing complete, unsuccessful Test Setup (left): Die springs (not shown) resist initial load After 6mm extension, fixture built to withstand 10kpsi Design As-Built Problem: Friction on sides prevented full extension & transmission of pressure Angled relief in fixture cavity for test #2 did not help Alternate Structure Work – CM15 11/2/10

  19. Outline Paolo Ferracin • Design features and FEA results comparison of for the two structures • Possible synergies • Options/plans for testing two coils in the same structure (to check the performance using half-length coils) • Options/plans for a test that will incorporate a pressure vessel over the aluminum shell • Heat transfer calculations and design features for improved cooling

  20. Two coils on the same structure Paolo Ferracin Field, end forces, required pre-load on RE to be modeled and analyzed Some practical issues with instrumentation wires No show stoppers

  21. Outline Paolo Ferracin • Design features and FEA results comparison of for the two structures • Possible synergies • Options/plans for testing two coils in the same structure (to check the performance using half-length coils) • Options/plans for a test that will incorporate a pressure vessel over the aluminum shell • Heat transfer calculations and design features for improved cooling

  22. Pressure vessel Paolo Ferracin Detailed design in progress No particular issue forseen

  23. Outline Paolo Ferracin • Design features and FEA results comparison of for the two structures • Possible synergies • Options/plans for testing two coils in the same structure (to check the performance using half-length coils) • Options/plans for a test that will incorporate a pressure vessel over the aluminum shell • Heat transfer calculations and design features for improved cooling

  24. NbTi “Phase I” upgrade quadrupole Paolo Ferracin • Heat-load of about 500 W • Heat exchangers with minimum inner diameters of 65 mm

  25. Heat transfer and cooling • Slots between pads • 80 mm holes Paolo Ferracin

  26. load from cable Paolo Ferracin

  27. Conclusions Paolo Ferracin • Design features and FEA results comparison • Both structure claimed to provide load and alignment • Different emphasis on loading or alignment • Comparable coil stresses (some issue at full field) • Possible synergies • Everything but iron parts • Options/plans for testing two coils in the same structure • Analysis to check forces and pre-load but no show stoppers • Options/plans for a test that will incorporate a pressure vessel over the aluminum shell • Design underway, no plans to test it, but it can be done • Heat transfer calculations and features for improved cooling • Holes to be implemented in HQ LBNL • Heat to be removed from the coil through pole pieces

  28. HQ structures • HQ LBNL • HQ BNL Paolo Ferracin

More Related