1 / 28

cs / ee 143 Communication Networks Routing Misc

cs / ee 143 Communication Networks Routing Misc. Text: Walrand & Parakh , 2010 Steven Low CMS, EE, Caltech. Outline. Putting it all together Routing across Internet LAN, intra-AS, inter-AS Routing across layers 2 and 3 Selfish routing: inefficiency Dynamic routing: instability.

kent
Download Presentation

cs / ee 143 Communication Networks Routing Misc

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. cs/ee 143 Communication NetworksRouting Misc Text: Walrand & Parakh, 2010 Steven Low CMS, EE, Caltech

  2. Outline Putting it all together • Routing across Internet • LAN, intra-AS, inter-AS • Routing across layers 2 and 3 Selfish routing: inefficiency Dynamic routing: instability

  3. Putting it all together initially unconnected [W&P 2010]

  4. Putting it all together [W&P 2010]

  5. Putting it all together How to route G  A? As soon as H is added, D tries to send a packet to H. What happens? If AS2.R2 goes down, what will be the routing changes? later goes down initially unconnected [W&P 2010]

  6. 1. compute spanning tree [W&P 2010]

  7. 2. compute intra-AS routing [W&P 2010]

  8. 3. compute inter-AS routing How to route G  A? [W&P 2010]

  9. 3. compute inter-AS routing How to route G  A? Does A  G follow the same path? [W&P 2010]

  10. 4. Address resolution protocol How to route G  A? As soon as H is added, D tries to send a packet to H. What happens? If AS2.R2 goes down, what will be the routing changes? initially unconnected [W&P 2010]

  11. 4. Address resolution protocol • Packets from D can be • delivered to subnet AS2.B1 • based on IP address of H • AS2.B1 does not know H • AS2.B1 uses ARP to find • H’s MAC address • Use STP to forward pkts to H initially unconnected [W&P 2010]

  12. Example: H1 wants to send packet to H2 Network Link [all, e1, who is IP2?] gateway Ethernet switch Link layer on H1 broadcasts a message (ARP query) on its layer 2 network asking for the MAC address corresponding to IP2

  13. Example: H1 wants to send packet to H2 Network Network Link Link [all, e1, who is IP2?] gateway Ethernet switch [e1, e2, I am IP2] Link layer on H2 responds to the ARP query with its MAC address

  14. Example: H1 wants to send packet to H2 Network Network Link Link [e2, e1,[IP1, IP2, X]] gateway Ethernet switch Once the link layer on H1 knows e2, it can now send the original message

  15. Example: H1 wants to send packet to H2 Network Network Link Link [e2, e1,[IP1, IP2, X]] gateway Ethernet switch [IP1, IP2, X] [e2, e1,[IP1, IP2, X]] Link layer on H2 delivers the packet to the network layer on H2

  16. 5. re-compute routing table How to route G  A? As soon as H is added, D tries to send a packet to H. What happens? If AS2.R2 goes down, what will be the routing changes? goes down [W&P 2010]

  17. 5. re-compute routing tables • Failure detected by AS2.R1 • and AS2.R3; update routing • tables (intra-AS) • Failure detected by border • gateway in AS5 • BGP re-computes • The path between AS2 and • AS5 will be changed goes down [W&P 2010]

  18. Outline Putting it all together • Routing across Internet • LAN, intra-AS, inter-AS • Routing across layers 2 and 3 Selfish routing: inefficiency Dynamic routing: instability

  19. Transportation network

  20. Transportation Network Which route to take? • Local alg: min my own delay • xr* with equal delay on all routes f +50 10 f f +50 10 f All delays = 83 equilibrium: delays on all paths equalized

  21. Global objective: min total delay Transportation Network Which route to take? • Local alg: min my own delay • xr* with equal delay on all routes f +50 10 f f+10 f +50 10 f All delays = 83

  22. Transportation Network Which route to take? • Local alg: min my own delay • xr* with equal delay on all routes f +50 10 f f+10 f +50 10 f “my delay (81) < 83!”

  23. Transportation Network Which route to take? • Local alg: min my own delay • xr* with equal delay on all routes f +50 10 f f+10 f +50 10 f All delays = 82, 81,93 not an equilibrium !

  24. Transportation Network Which route to take? • Local alg: min my own delay • xr* with equal delay on all routes f +50 10 f f+10 f +50 10 f Braess’s Paradox (1968) All delays = 92>83! new equilibrium: delays on all paths equalized, and worse!

  25. Transportation Network “Major road investments in the city center [of Stuttgart] failed to yields the benefits expected. They were only obtained when a cross street… was withdrawn from traffic use.” Murchlan, “Braess’s Paradox of traffic flow”, Transportation Research, 4:391-394, 1970 Dietrich Braess (German mathematician)

  26. not necessarily min! • Global objective All delays = 92>83! Braess’s Paradox (1968) Transportation Network Which route to take? • Local alg: min my own delay • xr* with equal delay on all routes f +50 10 f f+10 f +50 10 f

  27. network delay cost = delay + toll • route to smaller cost • xr* with equal cost on all routes Transportation Network • Global objective • Local algorithm • route to smaller delay • xr* with equal delay on all routes

  28. Outline Putting it all together • Routing across Internet • LAN, intra-AS, inter-AS • Routing across layers 2 and 3 Selfish routing: inefficiency Dynamic routing: instability

More Related