360 likes | 530 Views
Electrocardiogram (ECG) application operation – Part A. Final Presentation. Performed By: Ran Geler Mor Levy Instructor: Moshe Porian Project Duration: 2 Semesters Spring 2012. Contents. Introduction Top Architecture Overview Data Flow Components Simulations Performance
E N D
Electrocardiogram (ECG) application operation – Part A FinalPresentation Performed By: Ran Geler Mor Levy Instructor: Moshe Porian Project Duration: 2 Semesters Spring 2012
Contents • Introduction • Top Architecture • Overview • Data Flow • Components • Simulations • Performance • Problems in developing process • Conclusions • Part B schedule
Introduction • The heart is a muscular organ that beats in rhythm to pump blood through the body • By analyzing the heart behavior and especially the electrical impulses we can help identify heart diseases and special circumstance that require close monitoring
Medical Terms • ECG • Lead • Bipolar leads • Unipolar leads • Precordial Leads
Project Goals • Portable ECG device based on FPGA • Integrating Multi Platforms elements • ECG DB with FPGA • Interactive GUI with debugger abilities (Part B) • Methodic project
What we have achieved: • Implementing ECG controller • ECG FSM • Integration with peripheral components. • Examination of the Implemented components • Creating tests bench • Mocking TI DB behavior • P& R to projects top architecture by Quartus • Adding Flash memory support
Top Architecture – Frequency Frequency requirements for modules MATLAB GUI: Rx / Tx Via UART interface @ frequency of 115,200Hz FPGA: Main frequency: 100MHz Rx / Tx Modules @ frequency of 115,200Hz ADS1928R: Main frequency: 2.048MHz SPI-Data Out freq’: >110KHz Flash Memory: Main frequency: 100MHz
Core microarchitecture Data Rate: 100MHz 512Bytes Data Rate: >110KHz
Core Architecture • ECG FSM • FIFO • Command & Aux Regs • Wishbone Master & Slave • SPI Core
ECG FSM • Controls the flow of data between the host and the DB • Three Main chain of actions: • Read Data • Read Registers • Write Registers
FIFO at ECG Controller • FIFO Size: 512 Bytes. • Stores Instruction and Sampled data. • Data structure on Instruction case: 1st Command 2nd Command Operation Commands (ex: RDATAC, Rreg, Wreg, Standby, Reset, ect’..) Additional Data Optional: Second Byte for (Rreg, Wreg) and sample interval for RDATAC command. Data for commands
SPI • The SPI Interface frequency: • At 24bit resolution per 8 Electrodes and 500 Samples per Sec: • Active at low. i.e. CS = ‘0’
Flash Component WBS Flash Component FLASH Flash FSM Flash Controller RAM 256Byte Reset en
Flash Component - Flash • One sample(24bit res. per 8 Electrodes)= 27Byte. • Lets assume sample rate of 500 SPS • Flash size = 4MB • Therefore we can sample for 5min.
Flash Component – Flash client BUS Technical Demands: • Common FLASH Interface protocol (CFI) • Wishbone Interface • Performs Read, Write, Reset and Erase transactions • Initiative read on power-on • Contains a timeout algorithm • Generic: adaptable to different FLASH sizes and clock frequencies. CFI Wishbone
ADS1298R ECG DB • Texas Instruments Card • Arrived to the High Speed Digital Systems Lab
Test Methodologies • Operation of the ECG Controller: • Checking that states change are at time • Checking control signals & data signals between units • Non existing commands • NOTE: When a transaction is executed the wishbone “stall” signal is raised to ‘High’, So other requests will remain pending at the Rx Wishbone Master.
ECG Controller TB Data Flow • We have implemented a special closed component for Testing.
DB mocking • We have implemented a component that is imitating the TI DB behavior.
Simulations – Read Transaction example • Top Architecture Wave. Flash Rx Transaction SPI
Simulations – Read Transaction example • SPI Transaction
Simulations – Read Transaction example • Flash transaction
Simulations – Read Transaction example • FIFO Usage
Quartus Simulations • General Layout
Quartus Simulations • Max Frequency
Quartus Simulations • Top Arc Synthesis summary
Problems in developing process • Meet timings requirements of the TI Evaluation board. • Keep the projects specifications and requirements while adding more logic to the top arch. • Debug and testing of the whole implemented logic.
Conclusions • We learned a lot about the developing process & the importance of good planning a head • The importance of working organized • How much good documentation of previous project is important
Schedule – Part B 1w 1w 3w 1w
Schedule – Part B Cont. 1w 1w