220 likes | 412 Views
INFORMATION ETHICS IN THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY. Paul Sturges. A Paradigm Shift?. Library and Information Science (LIS) has been a predominantly technical subject for centuries In the Twenty First Century there are strong signs that ethical values have become central
E N D
INFORMATION ETHICS IN THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY Paul Sturges
A Paradigm Shift? • Library and Information Science (LIS) has been a predominantly technical subject for centuries • In the Twenty First Century there are strong signs that ethical values have become central • This suggestion is probably unprovable, but a sampling of professional activity can be offered to support the idea
The Domain of Information Ethics • The ethics of LIS are only a subset of a broader Information Ethics including • Media and Press Ethics • Computer and Internet Ethics • Ethics of (information aspects of) Governance and Business • All of these touch on issues including • Intellectual Freedom • Privacy and Information Security • Intellectual Property • Equitable Access to Information • Governance of the Internet.
A Sampling of Information Ethics Discourse • This presentation will sample • Formal Documentation (Codes, Manifestos and Charters) • The Literature (including web content) • Conferences, Education and Training • It will then explore an unexpected area into which a personal involvement with Information Ethics has led.
Codes, Manifestos and Charters • Codes of Ethics from Media, Computing and other fields deal with access to information in different ways • Some (LIS and journalism) stress freedom of access, • Others (Computing, Business Management or Competitive Intelligence) stress ownership and security. • National Codes (those for LIS for example) reflect their national cultures in the way they deal with information issues.
Other Information Policy Documentation • Declarations, Charters and Manifestos appear increasingly often. • IFLA, through its FAIFE core activity, has recently adopted a • Manifesto on Transparency, Good Governance, and Freedom from Corruption • This reflects the idea that corruption will not flourish where information transparency prevails, and libraries can promote transparency.
The Literature • Beginning in the 1970s but increasing towards the present decade, the literature of Information Ethics has expanded. • Articles appear across the general journals for LIS and other relevant disciplines, and in specialist journals like Journal of Information Ethics • There is little monograph literature, but good numbers of textbooks.
Web Content • At least two specialist websites can be identified: • International Center for Information Ethics at http://icie.zkm.de • An academic website • Includes news, lists of publications and is linked to a book series and an electronic journal • CILIP Information Ethics at www.infoethics.org.uk • Includes wide range of resources for professionals • Over 40 case studies in Information Ethics.
Conferences • LIDA 2001 had a sub-theme on • Internet: Ethics and Legal Issues • There are regular specialist conferences • UNESCO INFOethics conferences 1997, 1998, 2000 and others. • ETHICOMP and CEPE, concentrating on computer ethics. • Ethics of Electronic Information in the 21st Century, at the University of Memphis
Education • The presence of Information Ethics in curricula is widespread and increasing • It is hard to track because of the titles of modules, but • Various Universities in Europe and North America do specialise, for instance • University of Pittsburgh • University of Wisconsin Milwaukee • University of Alberta (Canada) • Loughborough University
Training • Information Ethics training programmes are offered by • Professional organisations such as national Library Associations • Training Consultancies • IFLA, through its FAIFE core activity, has a programme of Workshops (which will include Transparency Workshops, based on the new Manifesto, in 2009).
Some personal experiences:Starting with the Danish Cartoons • September 2005 Jyllands Posten published cartoons that proved offensive to Muslims • Public demonstrations followed, with loss of life and destruction of property • The demonstrators called for suppression of such material • Defenders of the newspaper cited freedom of expression
Freedom of Expression is not universally accepted • Christians oppose Jerry Springer: the Opera • Sikhs protest against Behzti a play put on in the UK • Sylheti Bangladeshis claim Monica Ali’s book Brick Lane insults them • ‘If she has the right to freedom of speech, we have the right to burn books. We are protecting our community’s dignity and respect’ • By talking of books this reminds us that libraries hold and make available much controversial and potentially offensive content.
Can we accept limits to Freedom of Expression? • Answers to this question can be found by looking at statements on human rights. • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights does recognise limits such as • National security • Prevention of disorder or crime • Protection of health and morals • It also speaks of duties to the community
Is avoiding offence a genuine limitation? • Opponents of the disputed cartoons, plays, books say that unacceptable offence has been given • Defenders say that satire is protected as freedom of expression • They add that avoiding offence leads to self censorship • The discussion tends to be deadlocked • The literature of jurisprudence offers some answers to the question of offence.
Feinberg’s Offence Principle • Feinberg’s Principle allows assessment of offence on aspects such as • Motives of the speaker • Community interests • Whether the material is widely or narrowly available • Although intended for the legal system, it can guide the exercise of free expression
Thinking about the audience • Feinberg’s Principle encourages thinking about the audience that is being addressed • Most importantly, is there a difference between • Satire directed at those in power • Similar comment that might offend whole communities and sectors of society? • Could the latter be ‘hate speech’ and thus unacceptable?
Decorum • Use of something like Feinberg’s Principle can be found in practice • Writers on comedy identify a principle of ‘decorum’ that moderates what comedians say and do • It is based on appropriateness for setting and theme • It involves the implicit ‘permission’ of an audience for satire
How is decorum exercised? • One way to assess the exercise of decorum is to go to a lot of comedy gigs • As a regular audience member at the Derby Funhouse Comedy Club this was no problem • Would comedians also be prepared to talk about their comedy in terms of ‘limits’? • Spiky Mike (promoter and compere) gave me access to the comedians and they talked willing and well.
What did the comedians say? • At first, stand-up comedians in England find it hard to think in terms of limitations. • Their audience is young, unconcerned with taboos, and used to open speech. • However, on consideration, comedians identify one or two areas (most commonly race) which they avoid, or treat with decorum • Everything else (sex, bodily functions, politics, religion, etc) they treat with near total freedom.
Comedians as guides to behaviour? • If even stand up comedians exercise restraint in difficult areas, this gives messages to librarians. • Some caution and respect for the audience (readers) is normal practice. • The danger is that this might become a rationale for librarians doing the work of censors. • Explorations in information ethics do not provide easy answers • But they can be surprising and exciting if we let ourselves look beyond accepted domain borders and traditional thinking.