1 / 31

Copernicus services and User Forum

Copernicus services and User Forum. Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff. USERS. Policy Makers. Private, Commercial. &. &. What is their need?. Overall view. Public. Examples of Services Provided. Farming. Arctic change. Oil Spill Tracking. Air Quality.

kevlyn
Download Presentation

Copernicus services and User Forum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Copernicus services and User Forum Finnish GMES User Forum Helsinki 9.1.2013 Mikko Strahlendorff

  2. USERS Policy Makers Private, Commercial & & What is their need? Overall view Public Examples ofServices Provided Farming Arctic change Oil Spill Tracking Air Quality Flood Surveillance InformationServices Land Marine Atmosphere Emergency Security Climate In Situ Infrastructure Sustainable observation Space Infrastructure & OBSERVATION

  3. Services as main goal • Core services – EU/public supported • Provide standardized common (multi-purpose) information for Europe; using economies of scale • Requested by the EU: link with European information needs • ‘public good’ data policy: open access and free licensing • Downstream services - Commercial/national • Tailored for specific applications at local, regional, national levels (public good or private use) • EU encourages and supports the implementation of these service layer (R&D)

  4. Monitoring of Earth systems Land GMES Services Marine Atmosphere Horizontal applications Security Emergency Climate Change

  5. Observational infrastructures • In-situ observation infrastructure: air-, sea- and ground-based systems and instruments • (e.g. airborne, balloons, floats, ship-borne, measuring stations, seismographs, etc) • Space infrastructure component for GMES: different missions co-ordinated at European level • Dedicated GMES missions: ESA Sentinels • Contributing missions: EU National, EUMETSAT and third parties

  6. GMES Space component • Sentinel 1 – SAR imaging • All weather, day/night applications, interferometry; for vessel detection, oil spills etc. • First launch 2013 • Sentinel 2 – Multispectral imaging • for land applications, e.g. urban, forest, agriculture, etc. • First launch 2013 • Sentinel 3 – Ocean & Land monitoring • Wide-swath ocean color, vegetation, sea/land surface temperature, ocean altimetry • First launch 2013 • Sentinel 4 – Geostationary atmospheric • Atmospheric composition monitoring, transboundary pollution • First launch 2017 on EUMETSAT MTG-S • Sentinel 5 – Low-orbit atmospheric • Atmospheric composition monitoring • Precursor launch 2013, S5 first 2020 on EUM Post-EPS • JasonCS – Ocean reference altimetry

  7. User Forum and requirements • GMES should be user driven • How is this working now? User Forum fills the flaw? • EC runs thematic workshops for each domain • User Forum has 2-3 domains on 1 meetings agenda

  8. Emergency management GIO-EMS in rush mode • 21 activations in the period April 1, 2012 – now; • 60% of activations, 78% of map products in Europe; • In Europe: 7 forest fires, 2 earthquakes, 3 “other” events; • Activations by AU in HU, IT (2), BG (2), ES (3), SE, PT, RO, DE, FR; • Outside Europe: primarily floods, triggered by European AU and ASCU, and WFP, 3 in coordination with Int. Charter “Space and Major Disasters”; • Close to expected trend for first 8 months.

  9. EMS Performance parameters • Target for End Users: • Reference map 6 hours • Delineation and Grading 24 hours after activation request. • Average timing achieved for products needing new satellite acquisition: • 3 hours for activation start up • 34 hours for satellite tasking and acquisition • 8 hours for satellite reception and validation • 17 hours for delivery of first post-event product • Average delivery time after activation request: 2.5 days; • Only few cases meet the End User target, typically when satellite imagery is in archive, or planned for monitoring extensions. • Major bottleneck is still the satellite latency

  10. Land service • GMES land monitoring service: Pan-European Component • - Providing land cover and land cover change information at Pan European scale (CORINE) • - Production of 5 thematic high resolution layers • Dissemination + archiving + cataloguing • Follow up of FP 7 GEOLAND – Euroland • Sub-Delegated tasks to the EEA • GMES WP 2011 – 2012 – 2013 / Budget 22 Mi Euro H. Dufourmont, EEA

  11. Land service Contract type : Framework contract for HRLs production + MS Grants for validation and CLC 2012 Date : November 2011 6 LOTS divided per geographic regions and thematic layers Contractors : Metria (Se), Geo Ville (Au), VTT (Fi), GAF AG (De), SIRS (Fr), Planetek (It), Planatek (Gr), Indra (Sp), Eurosense (Be), Rapid Eye(De) H. Dufourmont, EEA

  12. Land service • Implementation of GIO land services Pan EU Component on track except for: • Work going on regarding the participation of Candidate & potential Candidate Countries. • Minor delay in production of High Resolution Layers, following the necessity of an additional streamlining phase and the problems with availability of input imagery. • Mitigation measures: • Major mitigation measures had to be taken in the framework of the ESA GMES DWH • Coordination and flexibility amongst stakeholders is of key importance to keep the planning H. Dufourmont, EEA

  13. LAI VGT Land service • GMES land monitoring service: Global Land Component • - Providing Biophysical Parameters (13) on near real time, on a ten-daily frequency and with a world coverage • - Quality Control and User feedback analysis • Dissemination + archiving + cataloguing • Follow up of FP 7 GEOLAND – Biopar • Cross-Delegated tasks to the EU DG JRC • WP 2012 – 2013 / Budget 4 MEuro • Contractors: VITO (Be), HYGEOS (Fr), Meteo France (Fr), ZAMG (Au), IPMA (Pt), EOLAB (Sp), INRA (Fr), Tu Wien (Au), UCL (Be), Univ. Leicester (Uk), Univ. Lisbon (Pt) E. Bartholome, DG JRC

  14. Atmosphere service Objective GMES regulation: … air quality, atmospheric chemistry and composition … essential element for climate change monitoring and the future provision of ECVs … … on a regular basis and at regional and global levels… NRT analysis and forecast, reanalysis of past years • Air Quality for Europe • O3, NO, NO2, CO, SO2, PM10, PM2.5 • Global Atmospheric composition • Greenhouse gases, reactive gases, • aerosol, stratospheric O3 • Climate Forcing • CO2, CH4, monitoring and reanalysis of fluxes • Solar Energy, UV • Ozone records, ultraviolet radiation

  15. Atmosphere service Current implementation of pilot service Outside GIO as FP7 research project MACC-II • FP7-SPACE-2011: Prototype operational continuity of GMES services in the Atmosphere area • 36 participants from 13 different countries • 27,7 M€ total cost (19 M€ EC contribution) • From November 2011 to July 2014 • Coordinator: ECMWF (international organization) www.gmes-atmosphere.eu

  16. Atmosphere service • Follow-up … from GMES User Forum consultation

  17. Atmosphere service Main building blocks • Global system • ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (IFS), coupled to global chemical transport model (CTM) • assimilates weather in situ data and ~50 satellite sources, and composition data from ~10 satellite sources • extensive use of in situ composition data for validation • Regional system • Ensemble of seven nationally developed CTMs, European domain • driven by data from Global system • assimilates in-situ air-quality data and satellite data

  18. Marine environmental service Objective: To provide information on the state of physical ocean and marine ecosystems for the global ocean and the European regional areas. Monitoring and forecast plus reanalysis of past years on • Currents • Temperature • Salinity • Sea ice • Sea level • Surface winds • Biogeochemistry

  19. Current implementation of a pilot service • Implementation: • Outside GIO as FP7 research project MyOcean-2 • FP7-SPACE-2011: Prototype Operational Continuity for the GMES Ocean Monitoring and Forecasting Service • 59 participants from 28 different countries • 41,2 M€ total cost (28 M€ EC contribution) • From April 2012 to September 2014 • Coordinator: Mercator Océan • http://www.myocean.eu.org

  20. Marine environmental service Follow up … from GMES User Forum consultation

  21. Marine environmental service Main building blocks • Thematic Assembly Centres • Marine Forecasting Centres • Preparing the opera-tional service starting September 2014 • Negotiations on governance model for marine service

  22. Climate change service EU Regulation (911/2010) specifies that “access to information for climate change monitoring in support of mitigation and adaptation policies” shall be included in the GMES service component. • A Climate Change service must meet the Global Climate Observing System goals: • Monitor the climate system • Detect and attribute climate change • Assess impacts of, and support adaptation to, climate variability & change

  23. Climate change service • consultation process: expert group (2010-2011), ‘Helsinki GMES climate’ conference (Jul 2011), GMES user forum (Nov 2011). • 6th FP7 space call (closed since 21 Nov. 2012) • re-analysis (global and EU regional) • quality assurance for ECVs • climate indicator toolbox • Attribution products • data access EC funding: 26 M€

  24. Climate change building blocks FP7 work programme 2010 MACC-II (Nov 2011-July 2014) MyOCEAN-II (April 2012 – September 2014) GeoLAND-2 (September 2008 – December 2012) MONARCH-A (March 2010 – February 2013) CARBONES (April 2010 – March 2013) EURO4M (April 2010 – March 2014) ERA-CLIM (January 2011 – December 2013) FP7 work programme 2011 CORE-CLIMAX (30 months) CHARMe (24 months)

  25. Climate change service from European commission e.g.,FP7 Space call from other bodies e.g., ESA, Eumetsat, EEA, WMO.. Harmonization/Coordination & QA platform Climate Indicator Data Store Customization platform Evaluation platform Sectorial Information System Outreach platform Climate-ADAPT platform Selected information for customer DGs MS & other customers

  26. SECURITYAPPLICATIONS Preparatory Workshop GMES Security – Jun 2012 • To inform Member States on GMES Security Activities and to seek advise on the way ahead • Framing document distributed prior to the meeting • Series of presentations in 3 sessions (available in CIRCA): • Border Surveillance • Support to External Action • Maritime Surveillance • Detailed discussion in the Working-Groups (BS and SEA) • About 55 participants / Debate • Conclusions presented to the User Forum Oct 2012

  27. GMES support to EUROSUR (BS) GMES BS WG: COM (ENTR, HOME, JRC), Frontex, EUSC, EMSA, EDA, ESA, MS Experts Concept for EUROSUR, V1.0 of 3.12.2009 Concept of Operations for EUROSUR (CONOPS), V2.3 of 29.6.2011 FP7 call 2012 : LOBOS and SAGRES starting Jan 2013 Main stakeholders: FRONTEX, EMSA, EUSC (with Industry) GMES Support to EU External Actions (SEA) GMES SEA WG: SGC, RELEX, DEVCO, ECHO, ENER, JRC, ESA, EDA, EUSC, MS Experts Since 2011: EEAS 2010: Identification of User Scenarios 2011: Involvement of EEAS (via CMPD) 2012: (late/early 2013) WG recommendations 2013 (Jan): kick-off of 2 FP7 follow-on projects: G-NEXT and G-SEXTANT 2014 (mid): Detailed operational specifications Security applications

  28. Security applications • Maritime Surveillance • Mapping of Maritime Surveillance Activities: • FP7: FP7 : DOLHIN, NEREIDS, SIMITISYS, PTMAR • ESA: MARISS; • EDA: MARSUR; • EMSA: Operations and R&D • Coordination by Maritime Projects Coordination Board (PCB) • What else could be done in the area of Maritime Surveillance? • (e.g.anti-piracy/smuggling, fisheries control, monitoring illegal waste dumping) • Holistic approach needed to improve cost/benefit ratio • Governance issues at stake • different geometries across Member States • fragmentation of user communities; • Europe is still working on an integrated Maritime Strategy • Identification of requirements through CISE; • EDA to revitalise • Identification of requirements for the Defence (UK)

  29. FP7 GMES Security Projects timeline OPERATIONS

  30. Possible implementation/coordination

  31. Next steps on Copernicus • Decision on the budget (in/out MFF + amount) • If out MFF, intergovern. agreement • New Regulation proposed by EC • Debates + adoption by EP and Council (co-decision) • Delegation Agreements to be concluded (and procurement) • Start of the operations

More Related