1 / 10

LINKING REDD+ AND NAMAs

LINKING REDD+ AND NAMAs. NUR MASRIPATIN Director CENTRE FOR STANDARDIZATION AND ENVIRONMENT Ministry of Forestry INDONESIA WORKSHOP Building REDD-plus Policy Capacity for Developing Country Negotiators and Land Managers Hanoi, Vietnam, 18-20 May 2011.

khyman
Download Presentation

LINKING REDD+ AND NAMAs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LINKING REDD+ AND NAMAs NUR MASRIPATIN Director CENTRE FOR STANDARDIZATION AND ENVIRONMENT Ministry of Forestry INDONESIA WORKSHOP Building REDD-plus Policy Capacity forDeveloping Country Negotiators and Land Managers Hanoi, Vietnam, 18-20 May 2011

  2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND (international context) A. REDD+ from Montreal to Cancun : • COP-13 (Dec.1/CP. 13 “Bali Action Plan: Policy approaches and positive incentives for REDD+ /Paragraph 1 (b) (iii)”; Dec.2/CP.13 “RED in developing countries: Approach to stimulate actions”) • COP-15 (Dec. 4/CP.15 “Methodological guidance for REDD+ in developing countries”) • COP-16 (Dec.1/CP.16 “Cancun agreements: Outcomes of AWG-LCA work ”  Policy approaches and positive incentives for REDD+ in developing countries) B. NAMAs : from Bali to Cancun : • Dec.1/CP. 13 “Bali Action Plan (NAMAs/Paragraph 1 (b) (ii)” • Dec.1/CP.16 “Cancun agreements : outcomes of AWG-LCA work ” C. REDD+ negotiation  almost all developing countries did not agree to include REDD+ under NAMAs. STANDARDIZATION, ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE

  3. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND (national context) A. NAMAs : Indonesia Voluntary Mitigation Action B. Translating REDD+ activities into national strategy  next slide STANDARDIZATION, ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE

  4. Translating Scope of REDD+ in The National Strategy Reducing Emissions from DEFORESTATION (Forest conversion) REDD + Indonesia Reducing Emissions from Forest Degradation (SFM practice) Reduce emissions Sustainable Management of Forest NET SINK/ Balance Conservation (avoiding Emissions/ C stocks Conservation) Increase removals Enhancement of Carbon Stocks (Reforestation, Ecosystem Restoration) Scope of REDD+ according to Bali Action Plan

  5. LINK BETWEEN REDD+ AND NAMAs ( from legal basis and progress in implementation) • Both NAMAs and REDD+ are under “Enhanced national/international action on CC mitigation” in BAP (Dec. 1/CP.13), • Cancun agreement (Dec. 1/CP.16 Appendix II.c): modalities for MRV of REDD+ activities should be consistent with guidance for MRV of NAMAs and consider Dec. 4/CP.15  target for consideration by COP-17. • Challenge to link REDD+ and NAMAs: • many ambiguities in COP-decision relating to NAMAs • a lot of progress has been made in REDD+ both in the negotiation process and implementation STANDARDIZATION, ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE

  6. LINK BETWEEN REDD+ AND NAMAs (activities: Indonesia case) NAMAs in Forestry and Agriculture REDD+ activities Sustainable peatland management Forest Land Reducing Emissions from Deforestation (Red Forest conversion) Non-Forest Land Reducing Emissions From Forest Degradation (SFM practice) RR deforestation Reducing rate of deforestation and land degradation RR Land Degradation Conservation (Avoiding Emissions/ C stocks Conservation) Land rehabilitation, Afforestation, Reforestation, Replanting • Carbon • sequestration • Project (For & Agr) Enhancement of Carbon Stocks (Ecosystem Restoration) Part of activities are related STANDARDIZATION, ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE

  7. Possible causes of controversy in REDD+ and NAMAsdiscussions: 1. At the international level : • Negotiation process: two groups of views on whether REDD+ be part or not part of NAMAs • Other international processes (outside negotiation processes) tends to prefer REDD+ be part of NAMAs • At the national level: • Diversity in awareness of the issues and views on how to best translate the international instruments into the national context 3. From points (1) and (2)  have we been asking a wrong question? (whether REDD+ is part/not part of NAMAs ?Or how to best link REDD+ and NAMAs?). STANDARDIZATION, ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE

  8. INDONESIA CASE • Activities relating to REDD+ and NAMAs are ongoing  (1) translating COP-decisions into implementation, including efforts in bringing the issues into the mainstream of development planning (national and sectoral planning; national-provincial-district level planning), (2) awareness raising and increasing capacity relating to REDD+ and NAMAs and other relevant issues, • Indonesia is yet to develop her plan to implement the national policy on development and CC mitigation: achieving 7 % economic growth and 26 % emission reduction by 2020 (called 726 Formula), • Critical issue for Indonesia relating to REDD+ and NAMAs is how to ensure coherence between policy, actions, and MRV of REDD+ and NAMAs . STANDARDIZATION, ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE

  9. CLOSING REMARKS AND RECOMMENDATIONS • Both REDD+ and NAMAs are aimed at achieving CC mitigation goals, • Efforts should be directed to identify relevant issues from REDD+ and NAMAs, and work to address the issues, • Follow up COP-16 guidance on REDD+ relating to NAMAs(consistency between MRV for REDD+ and MRV for NAMAs), including what best could be done within uncertainty (including progress in REDD+ and NAMAs negotiations that is not at the same stage). STANDARDIZATION, ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE

  10. Thankyou

More Related