1 / 2

IPAC'10 Kyoto IPAC'11 San Sebastian IPAC'12 New Orleans IPAC'13 Shanghai IPAC'14 Dresden

Next two IPAC conferences: 2012 New Orleans (20 – 25 May, Morial Conference Center) 2013 Shanghai (13 – 17 May). IPAC'10 Kyoto IPAC'11 San Sebastian IPAC'12 New Orleans IPAC'13 Shanghai IPAC'14 Dresden IPAC'15 Richmond.

kiara
Download Presentation

IPAC'10 Kyoto IPAC'11 San Sebastian IPAC'12 New Orleans IPAC'13 Shanghai IPAC'14 Dresden

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Next two IPAC conferences: • 2012 New Orleans (20 – 25 May, Morial Conference Center) • 2013 Shanghai (13 – 17 May) IPAC'10 Kyoto IPAC'11 San Sebastian IPAC'12 New Orleans IPAC'13 Shanghai IPAC'14 Dresden IPAC'15 Richmond • Format will closely follow IPAC’10 (Kyoto) and IPAC’11(San Sebastian) • Extensive use of SPMS • Publication of proceedings on JACoW • Organization of IPAC'12 is now well under way • Use of SPMS: • - call for abstracts, speaker selection, conference registration • - industrial exhibits, editorial desk, final publication, etc, etc • JACoW collaboration • JACoWcommunication

  2. The use of SPMS and JACoW for PAC/APAC/EPAC, and now IPAC, is well-established… • …but these facilities can easily be taken for granted. • PCO'sare sometimes resistant to using the SPMS. • OC, SPC and LOC chairs need to be made aware of the value of the SPMS, and the risks of using software that is not integrated. • Alternative publication methods have been discussed and rejected. • Alternatives raise concerns with cost, accessibility, quality control, and single integrated search facilities. • JACoW is an extremely valuable resource for the accelerator community. • The long-term sustainability of JACoW is a concern. • Labs are increasingly reluctant to commit resources (particularly staff effort). • The main questions we have are: • How can we help to promote the value of SPMS and JACoW for the accelerator community? • What can we do to help ensure the long-term sustainability of SPMS and JACoW? IPAC'10 Kyoto IPAC'11 San Sebastian IPAC'12 New Orleans IPAC'13 Shanghai IPAC'14 Dresden IPAC'15 Richmond

More Related