1 / 16

Session 6 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance

Session 6 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance. FISH 521. NSF Merit Review Criteria. Intellectual Merit Scientific merit of the proposal Broader Impact ‘outreach’, public understanding of science, engagement plan Why is this important?

kiaria
Download Presentation

Session 6 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Session 6Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521

  2. NSF Merit Review Criteria • Intellectual Merit • Scientific merit of the proposal • Broader Impact • ‘outreach’, public understanding of science, engagement plan • Why is this important? • Almost all other agencies want something similar • Your tax dollars at work • Keep stakeholders happy • Foundations: show all the good work they are doing • NSF is leading the pack • Other agencies are likely to follow

  3. NSF Reviewer form • 3 points • Intellectual merit • Broader impact • Summary statement • Re-emphasized to panelists • Think about it carefully • Include in other aspects of proposal • New: similar forms for project summary • Summary • Intellectual Merit • Broader Impact

  4. Intellectual Merit • Potential • Importance to advancing knowledge within field or across different fields • Evidence for creative, original or potentially transformative concepts • Show the wider scientific impact of your project • Link to significance statement / intro • Provide alternative hook • Not just stamp collecting • Must be important beyond your system • Potentially transformative concepts • Revolutionize entire disciplines • Creating entire new fields • Disrupting accepted theories

  5. Intellectual Merit • Feasibility • Concept and organization of research • Qualifications of investigator • Access to resources • Can it be done? • Does proposal show testable hypotheses, a good work plan and good presentation?

  6. G. Muller-Parker, NSF

  7. G. Muller-Parker, NSF

  8. Broader impact G. Muller-Parker, NSF

  9. Broader Impact NSF GPG • What is the potential for the proposed activity 1.b.to benefit society or advance desired societal outcomes? • To what extent do the proposed activities suggest and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts? • Is the plan for carrying out the proposed activities well-reasoned, well-organized, and based on a sound rationale? Does the plan incorporate a mechanism to assess success? • How well qualified is the individual, team, or organization to conduct the proposed activities? • Are there adequate resources available to the PI (either at the home organization or through collaborations) to carry out the proposed activities? • Aim • Rationale • Preliminary data • Workplan • Resources, qualifications etc

  10. What are societal goals? • Varies among funding agencies • Common themes • Outreach, public scientific education • Involvement of underrepresented minorities • NSF • America COMPETES Act (2010) • economic competitiveness of US • develop globally competitive STEM workforce • participation of women & URM in STEM • partnerships between academic and industry • Improve pre-K through12 STEM ed and teacher partnerships • Improve undergrad STEM education • public scientific literacy • national security

  11. What are societal goals? • NSF performance goals (NSF strategic plan) • Transform the frontiers • T-1: Make investments that lead to emerging new fields of science and engineering and shifts in existing fields. • T-2: Prepare and engage a diverse STEM workforce motivated to participate at the frontiers. • T-3: Keep the United States globally competitive at the frontiers of knowledge by increasing international partnerships and collaborations. • T-4: Enhance research infrastructure and promote data access to support researchers’ and educators’ capabilities and enable transformation at the frontiers. • Innovate for society • I-1: Make investments that lead to results and resources that are useful to society. • I-2: Build the capacity of the nation’s citizenry for addressing societal challenges through science and engineering. • I-3: Support the development of innovative learning systems.

  12. Conclusion • Broader impact won’t save your proposal if the science is bad • However, a good broader impact statement may save your proposal if you are in the grey zone • Not only NSF • http://coseenow.net/wizard/ • Any ideas?

  13. Your proposal • Write 1-2 pages IM and BI • Intellectual Merit • After describing the details, what’s the cool scientific aspect (transformative) of your research? • Why are you the best person to do it (expertise (preliminary data), resources, access to sites, etc)? • Broader Impact • What is your objective? • What will you do? • Why can you do it? • What is the expected outcome?

  14. Panel Exercise • Work Plan vs Budget • Discuss link and justifiability of objectives • Discuss link to objectives • Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact • Discuss in connection to work plan & budget • revise • Reconsider what you wrote in the summary

More Related