410 likes | 494 Views
The Relationship between the Critical Success Factors and Academic and Athletic Success: A Quantitative Case Study of Black Male Football Student-Athletes at a Major Division I Southeastern PWI. Presented by: Joseph N. Cooper Thesis Committee: Dr. Edgar Shields (Advisor)
E N D
The Relationship between the Critical Success Factors and Academic and Athletic Success: A Quantitative Case Study of Black Male Football Student-Athletes at a Major Division I Southeastern PWI Presented by: Joseph N. Cooper Thesis Committee: Dr. Edgar Shields (Advisor) Dr. Elizabeth Hedgpeth Dr. Deborah Stroman
Inspiration for Study • Provide possible solutions to eliminate the academic achievement gap between Black and White male SAs • Expand the body of research of Black male SAs • Identify the critical success factors (CSFs) of Black male football SAs at a Division I Southeastern institution
Key Definitions Black or African-American Student-Athlete (SA) Critical Success Factors (CSFs) Predominately White Institutions (PWIs)
Literature Review • Jacqueline Fleming (1984) • Blacks in College • William C. Rhoden (1989) • The Experiences of Black Intercollegiate Student-Athletes at NCAA Division I Institutions • Patricia Adler (1991) • Backboards and Blackboards: College Athletics and Role Engulfment • Billy Hawkins (2001) • The New Plantation: The Internal Colonization of Black Student-Athletes
Issues facing Black male student-athletes at PWIs • Poor Intellectual Development • Social Isolation • Athletic Exploitation • First Generation College Students • Institutional Discrimination • Academic Negligence • Emotional Instability • Low Enrollment and Graduation Rates
Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study is to identify the critical success factors (CSFs) of current Black male football student-athletes (SAs) at a major Division I Southeastern public Predominantly White Institution (PWI) who exhibit high levels of success academically and athletically.
Limitations • Due to the time constraints and resources, this study was limited to a sample of current Black male football SAs at the major Division I Southeastern public PWI. • This study did not include all Black male football SAs. Specifically, it excludes all red shirt freshman and first year SAs. • This study did not consider the quality of education attained prior to enrollment at the major Division I Southeastern public PWI.
Limitations (cont’d) • This study did not include the parental status of the Black male football SAs participants. • This study did not include the socio-economic status of the families of the Black male football SAs participants. • This study does not provide an all inclusive solution to the obstacles facing all Black SAs.
Delimitations • This study was exclusive to current Black male football SAs at the major Division I Southeastern public PWI and thus the findings cannot be generalized to all Black SAs. • This study only included the current Black male football SAs with the exception of first year and redshirt freshman Black male football SAs.
Assumptions • It is assumed that all SAs answered all questions honestly and completely. • The completion of the survey and participation in the study is voluntary for all targeted SAs.
Data Reduction and Analysis • Descriptive Statistics • 42 participants (100% response rate) • 19 sophomores (45.2%) • 18 juniors (42.9 %) • 5 seniors (11.9%) • GPA Distribution (N=42) • High Academic Success • 21 participants (50%)-->GPA < or = 2.4 • Low Academic Success • 21 participants (50%)-->GPA > 2.4
Data Reduction and Analysis (cont’d) • Descriptive Statistics • Athletic Participation Distribution (N=42) • High Athletic Success • 21 participants (50%) participated and started in 0-11 games in the previous season • Low Athletic Success • 21 participants (50%) participated and started in 12-24 games in the previous season • Racial Diversity of High Schools Attended (N=42) • 54.7% (23) attended high schools that had at least 50% Black enrollment
Data Reduction and Analysis (cont’d) • Chi-Square Test Results (N=42) • Academic Success and Athletic Success • P-value=.355 (No significant relationship) • Personal Development and Academic Success • P-value=1.000 (No significant relationship) • Personal Development and Athletic Success • P-value=.513 (No significant relationship)
Data Reduction and Analysis (cont’d) • Chi-Square Test Results • Social Harmony and Academic Success • P-value=.513 (No significant relationship) • Social Harmony and Athletic Success • P-value=.533 (No significant relationship) • Engagement with a Strong Support System and Academic Success • P-value=.537 (No significant relationship)
Data Reduction and Analysis (cont’d) • Chi-Square Test Results • Engagement with a Strong Support System and Athletic Success • P-value=.537 (No significant relationship) • Career Aspirations and Academic Success • P-value=.513 (No significant relationship) • Career Aspirations and Athletic Success • P-value=.190 (No significant relationship)
Data Reduction and Analysis (cont’d) • Chi-Square Test Results • Time Management Skills and Academic Success • P-value=.204 (No significant relationship) • Time Management Skills and Athletic Success • P-value=.525 (No significant relationship) • Organized Religion and Academic Success • P-value=.495 (No significant relationship) • Organized Religion and Athletic Success • P-value=.495 (No significant Relationship)
Conclusion • There was no statistically significant relationship between academic success and athletic success.
Conclusion (cont’d) • There was no statistically significant relationship between academic success and the CSFs of: • Personal Development • Social Harmony • Engagement with a Strong Support System • Career Aspirations • Time Management Skills • Organized Religion • Results did not support the hypothesis
Conclusion (cont’d) • There was no statistically significant relationship between athletic success and the CSFs of: • Personal Development • Social Harmony • Engagement with a Strong Support System • Career Aspirations • Time Management Skills • Organized Religion • Results did not support the hypothesis
Conclusion (cont’d) • There was no relationship found between academic success and athletic success. • Out of the 21 participants who were categorized as high success athletically, 57.1% (12 out of 21) were also categorized as low success academically. • Supports the Role Theory (Adler & Adler, 1991)
Conclusion (cont’d) • Those participants who were categorized as high academic success and high athletic success reported higher levels of the following CSFs: • Personal Development • Career Aspirations • Time Management Skills • Organized Religion
Conclusion (cont’d) • Those participants who were categorized as high success academically and high success athletically reported lower levels of the following CSFs: • Social Harmony • Engagement with a Strong Support System
Conclusion (cont’d) • Personal Development and Academic Success • Only 33.3% (7 out of 42) of both groups (high and low academic success) reported low levels of personal development. • Implications • SAs invested a significant amount of their time managing their academic and athletic responsibilities. • Minimal time for enhancing their personal development in the form of extracurricular activities.
Conclusion (cont’d) • Social Harmony and Academic Success • From the 21 participants who reported a low level of academic success, 44.4% (10 out of 21) reported a high level of social harmony. • Implications • Participants who experienced a lack of social inclusion were less likely to perform at a high level academically. • 54.7% (23 out of 42) attended high schools that were at least 50% Black • Cultural Disconnect and Social Isolation
Conclusion (cont’d) • Engagement with a Strong Support System and Academic Success • Out of the 22 participants who reported a high level of engagement with a strong support system, 45.5% (10 out of 22) were also categorized as high success academically. • Implication • Participants who were academically prepared for college were less likely to have a high level of engagement of a strong support system.
Conclusion (cont’d) • Career Aspirations and Academic Success • Out of the 21 participants who reported a high level of career aspirations, 61.9% (13 out of 21) were also categorized as high success academically. • Implication • The participant’s perception of a viable career after college may have a positive impact on their academic performance.
Conclusion (cont’d) • Time Management Skills and Academic Success • Out of the 16 participants who reported a high level of time management skills, 62.5% (10 out of 16) were also categorized as high success academically. • Implication • Participants who possessed strong time management skills were more likely to perform at higher levels academically.
Conclusion (cont’d) • Organized Religion and Academic Success • Out of the 21 participants who were categorized as high success academically, 76.2% (16 out of 21)reported a high level of organized religion. • Implication • The presence of a strong belief and/or practice of a organized religion may have a positive impact on academic performance.
Conclusion (cont’d) • Personal Development and Athletic Success • Out of the 21 participants who were categorized a high success academically, 38.1% (18 out of 21) reported a high level of personal development. • Implication • Due to the time constraints from their athletic responsibilities, the time to pursue extracurricular activities that could enhance their personal development is limited.
Conclusion (cont’d) • Social Harmony and Athletic Success • Out of the 21 participants who were categorized as high success athletically, 61.8% (13) reported low level of social harmony. • Implications • Participants who experienced a high level of athletic success were more likely to possess feelings of social isolation. • Coaches and administrators must be sensitive to the feelings and experiences of their student-athletes.
Conclusion (cont’d) • Engagement with a Strong Support System and Athletic Success • Out of the 21 participants who were categorized as high success athletically, 52.4% (11 out of 21) reported low levels of engagement with a strong support system. • Implication • Participants who experienced a high level of success athletically may have been reluctant to seek out support from others.
Conclusion (cont’d) • Career Aspirations and Athletic Success • Out of the 21 participants who were categorized as high success athletically, 76.2% (16 out of 21) reported a high level of career aspirations. • Implications • High athletic participation could have a positive impact on career aspirations. • Many participants reported that becoming a professional athlete was their primary career goal, hence their high athletic participation.
Conclusion (cont’d) • Time Management Skills and Athletic Success • Out of the 16 participants who reported a high level of time management skills, 56.2% (9 out of 16) were categorized as high success athletically. • Implications • Athletic participation may have a positive impact on the development of effective time management skills. • The rigid structure of college football participation requires strict time constraints, which promotes effective time management skills.
Conclusion (cont’d) • Organized Religion and Athletic Participation • Out of 21 participants who categorized as high success athletically, 76.2% (16 out of 21) reported high levels of organized religion. • Implications • Participants who performed at a high level athletically possessed strong belief and/or practice of an organized religion. • The presence of organized religion can have a positive impact on a participant’s athletic performance.
Recommendations • Stronger academic support systems • Freshman ineligibility • Stricter enforcement of the 20 hours per week student-athletes spend on sport • Increased investment in the schooling of these student-athletes Sellers, et. al, 1991; Wiley, 1991; Lapchick, 1991; Harris, 1993; & Hawkins, 1999
Recommendations (cont’d) • Lapchick (1984) • Institutional Accreditation based on SA graduation rate. • Tinto (1987) • Systematic and system-wide in character • Merged and coordinated student activities • Integration of diverse institutional services • Consistent and continuous in character • Centrally located in organizational fabric of institution
Recommendations (cont’d) • Carr (1992) • Effective Orientation • Consistent Communication between Instructors and Coaches • Regular Academic Progress Review • Tutoring for SAs within the Athletic Department • Darling et. al (2007) • Assessment, Planning, Implementation, Evaluation and Reformation
Additional Research • An increased sample size of Black student-athletes: • SAs from multiple sports • SAs from different institutions • Female SAs • Former SAs • First-year SAs • Black non-SAs
Significance of Study • Opportunity for Black male football SAs at a major Division I Southeastern PWI. • Expanded the body of research in the area of research on Black male SAs in college. • Provided vital feedback for the coaches, athletic administrators, faculty and staff at the major Division I Southeastern PWI where the study was conducted. • Established a sample study that can be expanded and modified for future studies in the area of Black SAs.
Questions? Thank You