1 / 62

The EESC and the CAP reform 2014

The EESC and the CAP reform 2014. Lutz Ribbe JCC EU/ Kroatien, Zagreb, 27.1.11. EU Agri commissar MacSharry 1992. we destroy farms/ jobs and the environment with the billion we spend 20% of farmer receive 80% of all payments a need for new objectives:

kiefer
Download Presentation

The EESC and the CAP reform 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The EESC and the CAP reform 2014 Lutz Ribbe JCC EU/ Kroatien, Zagreb, 27.1.11

  2. EU Agri commissar MacSharry 1992 • we destroy farms/ jobs and the environment with the billion we spend • 20% of farmer receive 80% of all payments • a need for new objectives: • to motivate farmers to stay in the sector, to save the environment, to develop rural areas • All instruments should be linked to these goals • result: 5% der Mittel in „flankierende Maßnahmen“ heute: 20% der Bauern erhalten 85% der Zahlungen

  3. Objectives and Instruments of the CAP • For what or for whom the CAP is created for? • Before speaking about instruments, we should speak about the objectives • Instuments: not just spending money  „market stabilization“!!!

  4. Farming industrialorientation Agri“culture“ multifunctionalorientation EESC: What do wewant, and: whatdoes CAP wants? Main goal: to compete on the world market to implement the Europ. agriculture modal

  5. „farming/ cost leadership “ => traditional CAP • role of farmer: to produce row material in the most cheapest way • become more and more productive • rationalize, intensification of production • squeeze out soil, plants, animals … • … and the farmer himself • grow or go ( “structural change”) Food industry is asking: do we need farmer?

  6. aus: Der Spiegel 43/2000

  7. Geplanter „Deltapark“ im Hafen von Rotterdam Grafik: Der Spiegel (2000)

  8. Bodenerosion auf Ackerstandorten

  9. Keine Daten vorhanden < 10 10 – 40 40 – 80 80 – 120 120 – 170 > 170

  10. Folgen französischer Viehwirtschaft„Tödliche Algen“ Die Grünalgen sind zur Plage geworden und müssen aufwändig entsorgt werden. Foto: ap

  11. Biodiversität • „Die Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik (GAP) ist das politische Instrument, das sich am stärksten auf die biologische Vielfalt im ländlichen Raum auswirkt...“ KOM(2010) 548, S. 5

  12. Entwicklung bis 2014 „Wenn die gegenwärtige Entwicklung anhält, werden • in der EU-15 schätzungsweise 2 Millionen vollzeitbeschäftigte Arbeitnehmer • in den zehn neuen Mitgliedstaaten 1 bis 2 Millionen vollzeitbeschäftigte Arbeitnehmer und • zusätzlich 1 bis 2 Millionen Arbeitnehmer in Bulgarien und Rumänien die Landwirtschaft verlassen • Zu diesen Zahlen müssen noch rund 5 Millionen verdeckte Erwerbslose in den landwirtschaftlichen Betrieben hinzugezählt werden.“

  13. some more negative consequences • loss of biodiversity • water pollution • climate questions • animal welfare (mass production  80.000 pigs?) • problems in rural areas • quality of our food (what is quality? EU defintion?) • ….. • …..

  14. #2: multifuncional Agri“culture“ Competitiveness by: • diversification (not just row material) • more ecological friendly production (“public goods“) • higher quality (not only organic farming) • Regional and local market (Ciolos)  2nd pillar the „european agriculture modal“

  15. Brandenburg

  16. Hohenlohe, Baden-Württemberg

  17. Podlassien, Polen

  18. Narew, Polen

  19. Vogesen, Frankreich

  20. Berechnung Prof. Heissenhuber

  21. European Agriculture Modal • EESC (and many ngo`s) is promoting a “sustainable agriculture”, which is taking into account… • environmental questions (biodiv, climate, water, soil, …) • consumer, animal welfare, regional …. interests • social criteria's(within EU and outside!) • millennium goals (hunger/ 3rd world aspects) • countryside and landscape aspects agri”culture” EU on the path to the Europ. Agriculture Modal? EESC: NO!!!!  Agroindustry No chance under world market conditions

  22. CAP reform beyond 2013 • Communication of the Commission published 18.11.10 • Ciolos: CAP must become more fair and more green

  23. EU agriculture budget 2006 (EU25) Total 54.771,9 Mio. €

  24. 1. pillar CAP Direct payments and market regulations: • until 1992: price guarantees • 1992 – 2003: price compensation • since 2003: decoupled payments • decoupled? • for what taxpayers money is spend?

  25. Ciolos: a more fair system? is the existing system unfair?

  26. direct payments per ha EU(27)

  27. direct payments in Poland 2006 Quelle: EU Finanzstatistik > 20“ = 45.600 €, < 1.250“ = 340 €

  28. direct payments in spain 2006 Quelle: EU Finanzstatistik

  29. direct payments in Germany 2009 Quelle: BMELV Finanzstatistik

  30. Direktzahlungen und Einkommen

More Related