1 / 16

Results

Results. 1814 email contacts. 250 responded 14 %. 228 completed 92 %. 1855 authors. Response. excluded. 41 emails bounced. excluded. 1564 non-responders. excluded. 22 incomplete responses. Descriptives. Gender: 1:9. No. A ge in groups. Yrs in surgical practice.

kiele
Download Presentation

Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Results

  2. 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 1855 authors Response excluded 41 emails bounced excluded 1564 non-responders excluded 22 incomplete responses

  3. Descriptives • Gender: 1:9 No. Age in groups

  4. Yrs in surgical practice No. of responders 54% 19% 15% 9% 4%

  5. Location of authors 35% 25% 27% 4% 2% 7%

  6. Where last paper published: 9% 6% 7% 14% 22% • Other surgical journal: 13% • Other non-surgical journal: 29% • Yes, journal of first choice: 75% • No, previously submitted to higher IF surgery journal: 14% • No, previously submitted to higher IF non-surgical journal: 5% • No, previously submitted lower IF journal: 3%

  7. Main field of surgery %

  8. Do you prefer to submit your research to general or specialty journals?

  9. The journals you prefer to submit to are predominantly read by: • Global, general 65% • Primarily North-American 29% • by North Americans in 61% • by Europeans in 16% • Primarily European/regional/national 6%

  10. SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT FACTORFOR SUBMISSION

  11. The single most important factor:

  12. Age difference for IF vs Rep. p=0.033

  13. Journal factors in categories

  14. Conclusions Factors deemed most important The Journal “prestige” based on • Overall reputation • Impact factor Factors held least important Authors’ own “influence” • Knowing editor(s) or • selecting referees

More Related