1 / 2

A Simplified Model of Intrabeam Scattering*

Abstract

kieve
Download Presentation

A Simplified Model of Intrabeam Scattering*

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Abstract Beginning with the General Bjorken-Mtingwa solution, we derive a simplified model of intrabeam scattering (IBS), one valid for high energy beams in normal storage rings; our result is similar, though more accurate than a model due to Raubenheimer. In addition, we show that a modified version of Piwinski’s IBS formulation (where 2x,y/x,y has been replaced by ) at high energies asymptotically approaches the same result. INTRODUCTION • Intrabeam scattering (IBS) tends to increase the beam phase space volume in hadronic, heavy ion, and low emittance electron storage rings. • The two main detailed theories of IBS are ones due to Piwinski[1] and Bjorken-Mtingwa (B-M)[2]. • Solving IBS growth rates according to both methods is time consuming, involving, at each iteration step, a numerical integration at every lattice element. • Approximate solutions have been developed by Parzen, Le Duff, Raubenheimer[3], and Wei. NUMERICAL COMPARISON[4] A Simplified Model of Intrabeam Scattering* K.L.F. Bane, SLAC, Stanford, CA 94309, USA • Note that Raubenheimer’s 1/Tpformula is the same, except that ½ replaces g(a/b)H/ p;his 1/Tx,y formulas are identical. The function g() (solid curve) and the fit g=(0.021-0.044 ln) (dashes). The ratio of local growth rates in p as function of x, for b=0.1 (blue) and b=0.2 (red) [y=0]. • The plot on the right shows that, as long as  is not too close to 1, the result is not sensitive to , and the model approaches B-M from above as a,b0. • Piwinski’s formulation depends on dispersion through 2/ only. If we modify his result so that 2/ is replaced by , then at high energies his result asymptotically approaches that of B-M. • Consider as example the ATF ring with no coupling; to generate vertical errors, magnets were randomly offset by 15m, and the closed orbit was found; <>=17m, yielding a zero current emittance ratio of 0.7%. I=3.1 mA. HIGH ENERGY APPROXIMATION The B-M solution has integrals involving 4 normalized parametersa, b, x, y: where =[2+(’ ½’)2]/  is the dispersion invariant, and =’ ½’/. For our approximation we: (1) assume a,b<<1, and (2)set x,y to 0 Steady-state local growth rates over ½ the ATF, for an example with vertical dispersion due to random errors. Given are results due to Bjorken-Mtingwa, modified Piwinski, and the high energy approx. The approximate growth rates: • For coupling dominated NLC, ALS example (=0.5%) the error in steady-state (Tp1,Tx1) obtained by the model is (12%,2%), (7%,0%). A fit: [1] A. Piwinski, in Handbook of Accelerator Physics, (1999) 125. [2] J. Bjorken and S. Mtingwa, Part. Accel., 13 (1983) 115. [3] T. Raubenheimer, SLAC-R-387, PhD thesis, 1991. [4] K. Bane, et al, Phys Rev ST-Accel Beams 5:084403, 2002. REFERENCES Transverse growth rates: * Work supported by DOE contract DE-AC03-76SF00515

More Related