240 likes | 374 Views
Quality control of gynecological operations in Sweden: How and what? . GYNOP Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery www.gynop.org. HOW? Measurements for Improved Quality in Healthcare. TOP – DOWN. Singapore China India Scotland England Australia Canada
E N D
Quality control of gynecological operations in Sweden: How and what? GYNOP Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery www.gynop.org
HOW?Measurements for Improved Quality in Healthcare TOP – DOWN Singapore China India Scotland England Australia Canada +Denmark +Germany + …. • Government + departments... • Quality indicators • Recommandations • Standards • Certification • Accreditation • National statistics
HOW?Measurements for Improved Quality in Healthcare BOTTOM – UP…. Sweden + Australia? • Enthusiasts + nerds...
HOW?Measurements for Improved Quality in Healthcare BOTTOM – UP…. Sweden • Enthusiasts + nerds... • Rapidly growing number registries • in the nineties • 1997 Gynop • 2007 ”the local authorities and regions took the responsibility of the continuing operation, development, and financing of the registries”
HOW?Measurements for Improved Quality in Healthcare BOTTOM – UP…. Sweden • Sweden today... • 8 ”competence centres” • 78 ”accepted” national quality registries • 24 ” candidate” registries
HOW? The gynaecological family 1997 Laparoscopy Hystero- scopy Database
HOW? The gynecological family since 2006 Adnex Benign abd. surgery Hystero- scopy Database Malignant tumours Prolapse Incon-tinence
DOCTOR PATIENT Pre-op questionnaire Questionnaire 8 weeks post-OP Questionnaire 1 year post-op
DOCTOR PATIENT Pre-OP questionnaire Status at ADMISSION OPERATION Status at DISCHARGE Questionnaire 8 weeks post-OP 8 weeks - assessment Questionnaire 1 year post-OP 1 year - assessment
WHAT? QUALITY????? PATIENT oriented Fitness for purpose MANAGEMENT oriented Value for money CARE oriented Medical perfection
What do we do with our data? COMPARISON on NATIONAL LEVEL ?
What do we do with our data? COMPARISON on NATIONAL LEVEL = • Uninformative for the clinician
What do we do with our data? COMPARISON on NATIONAL LEVEL = • Uninformative for the clinician • Irrelevant for the patient
What do we do with our data? COMPARISON on NATIONAL LEVEL = • Uninformative for the clinician • Irrelevant for the patient • Boring, for quality-minded professionals
COMPARISON on CLINIC + INDIVIDUAL LEVEL ?
COMPARISON ”IMPOSSIBLE” on CLINICAL + INDIVIDUAL LEVEL =
COMPARISON ”IMPOSSIBLE” on CLINIC + INDIVIDUAL LEVEL = • because of …. • CASE MIX……… • POLITICS……… • MONEY………… • EGO……………. • TRADITIONS….. • ..anything goes..
COMPARISON on CLINICAL + INDIVIDUAL LEVEL = YES WE CAN… • Comparable Patient Groups • Dynamic Benchmark
COMPARISON on CLINICAL LEVEL version 2006 Einfache Prolapsoperationen
COMPARISON on CLINICAL LEVEL version 2009 Einfache Prolapsoperationen Dynamic Benchmark
COMPARISON on CLINICAL LEVEL version 2012 Einfache Prolapsoperationen
What do we do with our data? Clinical data + ”Rapportgenerator” Production reports Scientific research ”for all” Special reports ”Open report” (Öppna Jämförelser) Pre-op information of patients Gyn. Departments ”annual report”
Quality control ain’t easy….. Thank you for listening! emil.nussler@gmail.com Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery www.gynop.org