130 likes | 236 Views
State Variations in the Child Outcome Summary Form Process. August 2007 Baltimore, MD. Lisa Balivet (AK) Part C Christine Demer (WY) B-5. About Alaska. Decision to use the COSF Received a GSEG in 2004 Stakeholder process Pilot process. About Wyoming. Birth-5 system
E N D
August 2007 Baltimore, MD Lisa Balivet (AK) Part C Christine Demer (WY) B-5
About Alaska • Decision to use the COSF • Received a GSEG in 2004 • Stakeholder process • Pilot process
About Wyoming • Birth-5 system • Decision to use the COSF • When data collection started
How and why did you adapt the ECO Child Outcome Summary Form (COSF) to fit your state?
What State guidance and/or local practices exist related to teaming/collaboration to complete the COSF?
What State guidance and/or local practices exist related to who must take the lead or responsibility to ensure COSF is completed for each child?
How and when is the child outcomes measurement process explained to families?
What is the role of the family in the child outcomes measurement process?
What additional state guidance or support has been developed for providers?
What data and/or feedback do you have to-date about how the COSF process is working?