1 / 7

Dr. Jonathan Supovitz

Engaging the Core. Common Core Implementation in New York City. Dr. Jonathan Supovitz Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania Consortium for Policy Research in Education www.cpre.org MAY 19, 2014. Policy Design. CHANGE IN BEHAVIOR OR PRACTICE. IMPLEMENTATION. POLICY.

kimo
Download Presentation

Dr. Jonathan Supovitz

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Engaging the Core Common Core Implementation in New York City Dr. Jonathan Supovitz Graduate School of Education, University of PennsylvaniaConsortium for Policy Research in Educationwww.cpre.org MAY 19, 2014

  2. Policy Design CHANGE IN BEHAVIOR OR PRACTICE IMPLEMENTATION POLICY Interpretation Conflicting Signals Resistance

  3. Important Distinctions Policy vs. Program Engagement vs. Implementation

  4. Context of New York City

  5. Policy Design for Schools to Engage with the Common Core in New York City Policy design sought to foster engagement of schools with the Common Core thru a simple set of Citywide Instructional Expectations: Develop deep, shared understanding of Standards. Examine student work to conduct a gap analysis. Analyze student work to evaluate instruction. Select and administer performance tasks.

  6. School Experiences Conservation-Oriented Schools Transformation-Oriented Schools • More substantial changes to curriculum and teaching. • Worked backward from expectations to teaching implications. • Deepened shared understanding of the Standards • Incremental changes to curriculum and teaching. • Performance tasks often decontextualized. • Adapted work to fit current practices

  7. Take Aways • Standards adoption is an adaptivechallenge. • Engagement implies more ownership than implementation. • Will Common Core move beyond a curricular reform and become an instructional reform?

More Related