180 likes | 406 Views
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]. [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification Review. for [RELATED ENTITIES] [ LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [ Presenter Name, Title] Closing Presentation [Month Day, Year] . [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO].
E N D
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO] • [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification Review • for [RELATED ENTITIES][LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] • [Presenter Name, Title] Closing Presentation [Month Day, Year]
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Thanks • [Thanks to Entity Management] • [Thanks to Entity Certification Review Team] • [Thanks to ???????] • [Thanks to ???????] • [Thanks to ???????]
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Topics to Review • Certification Review Process and Team Members • Positives • Bucket Items • Post Certification Review Tentative Timeline and Reminders • Feedback • Questions and Answers
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Standards Reviewed • [Standard 1 i.e. EOP-008-0] [Standard Title] • [Standard 2 ] [Standard Title] • [Standard 3 ] [Standard Title] • [Standard 4 ] [Standard Title] • [Standard 5 ] [Standard Title] • [Standard 6 ] [Standard Title] • [Standard … ] [Standard Title]
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] NERC (BA) (RC) (TOP) Certification Review • Certification Review Process • Performed Per the NERC Rules of Procedure Section 500 and Appendix 5A • The Certification Review Team • [Team Leader 1 (CTL)] [Company affiliation] • [Team Member 2] [Company affiliation] • [Team Member 3] [Company affiliation] • [Team Member 4] [Company affiliation] • [Team Member 5] [Company affiliation] • [Team Member 6] [Company affiliation]
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Positives • Practice that will support/improve the reliability of the BES • Practice that will support/improve the reliability of the BES • Practice that will support/improve the reliability of the BES • Practice that will support/improve the reliability of the BES
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Positives(Cont.) • Practice that will support/improve the reliability of the BES • Practice that will support/improve the reliability of the BES • Practice that will support/improve the reliability of the BES • Practice that will support/improve the reliability of the BES
This slide is for info only Use one of the next two slides.
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Bucket 1 Items Bucket 1 Items Certification Review Team recommends a full certification based on the following conclusions: • 1st Issue – Based on the following evidence • 2nd Issue – Based on the following evidence • 3rd Issue – Based on the following evidence
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Bucket 1 Items Bucket 1 Items There were no issues the Certification Review Team found that would prevent a recommendation of certification review approval.
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Bucket 2 Items The following items must be closed prior to certification review approval: • Issue – Evidence required • Issue – Evidence required • Issue – Evidence required
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Bucket 2 Items(Cont.) • Issue – Evidence required • Issue – Evidence required • Issue – Evidence required
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Bucket 3 Items The following items are suggestions the Entity might consider to improve reliability and/or performance: • Suggestion • Suggestion • Suggestion These will not be included in the Final Summary Report
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Bucket 3 Items(Cont.) • Suggestion • Suggestion • Suggestion
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Post Certification ReviewTentative Timeline NOTE: following dates are anticipated and subject to change • Closure of all Bucket 2 items by [Date] • A draft report will be provided to [Entity Name] by [Date After bucket 2 items closed] • [Entity Name] to review draft report and return by [Date] • If [Entity Name] disagrees with the CRT conclusions, this should be communicated in writing immediately to NERC nerc.certification@nerc.netand clearly state the reasons for disagreement.
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Post Certification Review Tentative Timeline (Cont) • The final Summary Report, with [Entity Name]’s comments included where appropriate, will be reviewed by [REGIONAL ENTITY] management and upon approval, transmitted to [Entity Name] and submitted by [REGIONAL ENTITY] to NERC Approval by [DATE]. • The official letter confirming that a full certification is not required will be submitted [ENTITY] by NERC on [DATE]. NERC Alert needs to be advised if a change in Registration is effected.
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] [Entity Name] Feedback • [Entity Name]’s feedback of the Certification Review process is sincerely requested. The ERO strives for continuous improvement, and tracks and reviews all feedback. • Feedback forms will be provided via email. • Please be candid when filling in the forms whether it is comments regarding the process, the feedback forms and/or the CRT performance. • Note that the feedback does not require naming the author of the feedback. • Please return the completed form to [RE Email] as soon as possible.
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO] Questions and Answers