230 likes | 383 Views
Corporate Governance Systems. Team 4 Candice Woods Jennifer Zhang May 27, 2013. What is Corporate Governance?. The system of rules and practices that governs a firms decision making processes.
E N D
Corporate Governance Systems Team 4 Candice Woods Jennifer Zhang May 27, 2013
What is Corporate Governance? • The system of rules and practices that governs a firms decision making processes
Assigned Article • Stakeholder rights and corporate governance: • A cross-national study of hostile takeovers William D. Schneper Mauro F. Guillén
What is a Hostile Takeover? • A corporate acquisition implemented either by a shareholder or stakeholder that is in contest to a firms incumbent managers
Normative Power Conception Traditional Viewpoints Hostile Takeover
Governance Systems Stakeholder Model Shareholder Model Firms purpose is to make SH’s Richer Ongoing Power Struggle Managers vs. SH’s Profit maximizing; high-risk Hostile takeover is correlated with economy health and company performance • Corporate control depends on Support • Ongoing Power Struggle • Risk-averse; utilize capital • Share Price measure of Performance • Hostile Takeovers are rare
Findings • Hostile Takeover increase when there are strong SH rights and when financial institutions and workers rights are not strongly protected • Inversely correlated
Article 1 • “The role of Hostile Takeovers in Corporate Governance” • RajeevaSinha • Underperformance does not motivate a hostile takeover • Narrowly defined a hostile takeover • Occurs when the managers or BOD have been replaced during hostile takeover • Other wise a Synergistic Takeover
Creative Destruction • Schumpeterian process of ‘creative destruction’ likely the cause of hostile takeovers Hostile takeovers in Europe • Hostile takeovers occur in waves; correlated to technological advances and political/economical changes • Mechanism to adapt to external environmental changes
Currently used Defense Strategies United States United Kingdom Employed dividends Announced Profits • Charter amendments • Litigation • Poison Pill • “flip in” • “flip over” • Greenmail
Article 2 “Stakeholder Theory: Reviewing a Theory That Moves Us” André O.Laplume, Karan Sonpar &Reginald A.Litz 3 Main Stakeholders • Shareholders • Banks • Workers “To be an effective strategist, you must deal with those groups that can affect you, while to be responsive, you must deal with those group that you can affect.” -Freeman
Who else can be the Stakeholders Internal Stakeholders External Stakeholders Governments Competitors Consumer advocates Environmentalists Special interest groups media • Owners • Customers • Employees • Suppliers
How do Stakeholders Influence Firms • With direct & indirect withholding and conditional usage strategies • Influence depends on relationship structure, contractual forms, and institutional supports • Influence is determined by the power and legitimacy of a stakeholder • By forming coalitions and collaboration.
How Suppliers Influence A Firm’s Decision Making • Porter’s Five Forces Model • The Strength of Bargaining Power of Suppliers
How do firms gain stakeholder support? • By building stakeholder trust and avoiding opportunistic relationships • Maintain a good reputation • Become involved in non-profit work • Increase work involvement by offering an employee stock option
Article 3 The second assigned article “Comparative and International Corporate Governance” Ruth V. Aguilera a & Gregory Jackson cross-country diversity in corporate governance
Correlations in Conclusion Recall from the previous slide
References • Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. 2010. Comparative and international corporate governance. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1): 485-556. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.495525 • Laplume, A., Sonpar, K., & Lits, R. (2008). Stakeholder Theory: Reviewing a Theory That Moves Us. Journal of Management, 34:1152. Doi: 10.1177/0149206308324322 • Porter, E., M. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review. January, 2008, 79-92. • Schneper, W. D., & Guillen, M. F. 2004. Stakeholder rights and corporate governance: cross-national study of hostile takeovers. Administrative science quarterly, 49(2): 263-295. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com/bsi/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=a2f62067-c872-42d0-994d-e9cd09965b01%40sessionmgr115&vid=52&hid=117 • Sinha, R. (2004). The role of hostile takeovers in corporate governance. Applied Financial Economics, 14(18), 1291-1305. doi:10.1080/0960310042000280492