190 likes | 297 Views
Utility Cost Estimating In Practice. Scott Riddle Vice President – Public Utilities KCI Technologies Inc. Overview. Maryland’s Process Milestones Responsibilities Tools Production History Rate of Success Next Steps…. Background. 17 Years of Experience with Utilities
E N D
Utility Cost EstimatingIn Practice Scott Riddle Vice President – Public Utilities KCI Technologies Inc.
Overview • Maryland’s Process • Milestones • Responsibilities • Tools • Production History • Rate of Success • Next Steps…..
Background • 17 Years of Experience with Utilities • Majority of KCI’s Work is Directly for the Utilities. • Understanding of DOT’s Needs and Schedules. • Success with Utility Coordination Comes From Successful Relationships.
Maryland’s Process • Project Planning • Utility Estimates by Highway Planners. • Rough Assessment Approach. • 2002: SHA asked KCI to Develop “Planning Level Utility Estimating Matrix”.
Preliminary Investigation • 30% Plans Are Sent To The Utility Companies • Rough Drainage • No MOT • Incomplete Grading • Utility Company Resource Issues • Many Projects Die Between P.I. and Final • Provide High “Ball Park” Estimates That Will Often “Kill” Project.
Semi Final – PS&E • As SHA Plans Improve • Drainage Is Complete • Test Pitting Clarifies Impacts • Utility Estimates Are Updated • As Real Impacts Are Known, Estimates Become More Focused • Estimates Maintain High Contingencies Factor Because of “Risk”
Prior Rights • SHA initiates the “RW57” Form Process • Utilities identify impacted facilities • Utilities research for existing easements and Rights of Ways • Submit to SHA for review • SHA reviews and validates research • Final percentage is: Total “Covered” Facilities/Total Facilities
Prior Rights • Grey Areas • Pole Outside of Right of Way, Conduit in Right of Way • Cables Feeding from County Road
Risk Management • DOT’s Risk • Under Estimate Funding Request • Higher Bids Due to Unknown Utility Involvement • Delay Claims Due to Concurrent Utility Work • Higher Bids Due to Construction Methods • Overhead Clearances • Handwork
Risk Management • Utility Company’s Risk • Under Estimate Project Funding • Loss of Service to Customers • Increased Effort for Relocation
Maryland’s Process Utility Estimate By Highway Planner Estimate By Utility with 30% of Information Planning Estimate Impacted Utilities Known, Estimates With Contingences and Prior Rights Complete Final / PS&E Estimate Actual Construction Rubber Meets the Road
Results – Data Source • SHA’s Project Cost Database • 925 Total Projects Since 1992 • 773 Projects with Complete Data • 45 Projects with Cost Not Estimated • 107 Projects without Final Cost
Results – Total Dollars Values In Millions
Results – Total Cost Values In Millions
Process Issues • Wide Variation on Individual Projects • Utility Estimates During Design Excessively High often Killing Projects • DOT Can’t Verify or Predict Utility Estimate • Utility Company can’t Respond to the Schedule or Flexible needs of DOT
New Approaches • Consultant Involvement with Utility Review • Relieves burden on Utility Companies • Works to DOT’s Schedule • Develop Utility Cost Data • Interactive Coordination During Design • Reduce Changes • Continue to Develop Relationship with Utilities.