1 / 19

Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC

Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC. Ji Qiang. US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006. Outline. Strong-strong simulation of elliptical colliding beams at LHC Offset beam-beam interactions at LHC Long-range beam-beam effects at RHIC.

kioko
Download Presentation

Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006

  2. Outline • Strong-strong simulation of elliptical colliding beams at LHC • Offset beam-beam interactions at LHC • Long-range beam-beam effects at RHIC

  3. Elliptical colliding beams at LHC • Using Dipole first with doublet focusing • Focuing is symmetric about the IP • Less magnets and lower nonlinear fields at IP • Increase of luminosity

  4. Computational Model • Two collision points (no parasitic collisions) • With 0.212 mrad half crossing angle • Linear transfer map between IPs • Tunes (0.31, 0.32) • Beta* (0.25, 0.25) vs. (0.462,0.135) • One million macroparticles for each beam • 128 x 128 x 1 for strong-strong beam-beam force calculation

  5. RMS Emittance Growth with Round and Elliptical Colliding Beams at LHC X elliptical Y elliptical Y round X round

  6. Offset Beam-Beam Collisions at LHC

  7. LHC Physical Parameters for the Beam-Beam Simulations Beam energy (TeV) 7 Protons per bunch 10.5e10 b* (m) 0.5 Rms spot size (mm) 0.016 Betatron tunes (0.31,0.32) Rms bunch length (m) 0.077 Synchrotron tune 0.0021 Momentum spread 0.111e-3 Beam-Beam Parameter 0.0034

  8. A Schematic Plot of LHC Collision Scheme IP5 3 4 C D E 2 5 B A F 1 6 IP1

  9. One Turn Transfer Map M = Ma M1 Mb M2 Mc M3 Md M4 Me M5 Mf M6 M = M6-1 Mf M6 Ma M1 Mb M1-1M1 M2 M3 M3-1 Mc M3 Md M4 Me M4-1M4 M5 M6 Here, Ma and Md are the transfer maps from head-on beam-beam collisions; Mb,c,e,f are maps from long-range beam-beam collisions; M1-6 are maps between collision points. • Linear half ring transfer matrix with phase advanced: • 90 degree phase advance between long-range collision points and IPs • 15 parasitic collisions lumped at each long-range collision point with 9.5 s separation

  10. RMS Emittance Growth vs. Horizontal Separation at LHC (No Parasitic Collisions) 0 s 0.1 s 0.2 s 0.4 s

  11. RMS Emittance Growth vs. Horizontal Separation at LHC (With 60 lumped Parasitic Collisions) 0 s 0.1 s 0.2 s 0.4 s

  12. Long-Range Beam-Beam Effects at RHIC • Study the effects of long-range beam-beam (LRBB) at RHIC for the coming wire compensation experiment and find the maximum signal-to-noise ratio setting subject to some limits • The effects of LRBB subject to • Separation • Tunes • Chromaticity • Sextupole nonlinearity • etc

  13. RHIC Physical Parameters Beam energy (GeV) 100 Protons per bunch 2e11 b* (m) 1 Transverse Emittance [ mm-mrad] 15 Momentum spread 0.3e-3 Rms bunch length (m) 0.7 Tunes case 1 (28.68,29.69) and (28.73,29.72) Tunes case 2 (28.68,29.69) and (28.68,29.69) Tunes case 3 (28.73,29.72) and (28.73,29.72)

  14. Computational Model • 4 x 4 linear transfer map (146 linear map between sextupole) • Sextupole nonlinearity (144 thin lens kicks) • Self-consistent strong-strong beam-beam • 1 Million macroparticle for each beam • 128 x 128 x 1 mesh grid

  15. Averaged Emittance Growth Rate vs. Vertical Separation Case 3 Case 1 Case 2

  16. Vertical Emittance Growth without/with Chromaticity With 6x6 linear map With 6x6 linear map + chromaticity kick

  17. Vertical Emittance Growth without/with Sextupoles With 6x6 linear map With 4x4 linear map + sextupoles

  18. Summary • Initialsimulations indicate larger emittance growth from the elliptical colliding beams than the round colliding beams at LHC • The effects of static offset beam-beam collisions on emittance growth is weak without parasitic collisions at LHC. It can be large with the including of parasitic collisions. • LRBB at RHIC • Significant emittance growth for beam-beam separation below 4 sigmas • Emittance growth show some dependent on the machine tunes. For some tunes, the emittance growth shows a linear dependent on separations; Other shows nonlinear dependence. However, beyond 6 sigmas, the emittance growth is no longer sensitive to the machine tunes. • The effects of chromaticity depends on the machine tunes and becomes weaker for larger separation. • Stronger sextupole strength might help to improve the signal-to-noise ratio at large separation.

  19. Future Studies • Study of emittance growth including parasitic collisions and nonlinear longitudinal map • Study of emittance using an updated LHC lattice parameters with distributed parasitic collision model • LRBB at RHIC • Including both chromaticity + sextupole + LRBB in the simulation • Systematic comparison with experiment data • Wire compensation

More Related