1 / 7

Leodardo da Vinci Project - LeoVation

Leodardo da Vinci Project - LeoVation. Report of the closing meeting on June 6, 2005 Vienna, June 7th, 2005. Participants. Branislav Riha (via Telephone) Leonard Merckens Marko Schuster (via Telephone) Mario Freissl (via Telephone) Roman Billiani Therese Mitterbauer

kiora
Download Presentation

Leodardo da Vinci Project - LeoVation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Leodardo da Vinci Project - LeoVation Report of the closing meeting on June 6, 2005 Vienna, June 7th, 2005

  2. Participants • Branislav Riha (via Telephone) • Leonard Merckens • Marko Schuster (via Telephone) • Mario Freissl (via Telephone) • Roman Billiani • Therese Mitterbauer • Mark Macqueen (Coordinator and Chair)

  3. Project Progress - LeoVation Project • Task: Creation of a MAC marketing plan for UK • Team: Branislav Riha, Mario Freissl (Stoke/UK) • Outcome: Detailed marketing plan • Status: Completed • Task: Creation of an overview audit scheme for Mondi Plants • Team: Marko Schuster, Roman Billiani (Stoke/UK) • Outcome: Company audit scheme, analysis of visited plant • Status: Completed • Task: Creation of an overview audit scheme for Mondi Plants • Team: Leonhard Merckens, Therese Mitterbauer (Libercourt/FR) • Outcome: Company audit scheme, analysis of visited plant • Status: Completed

  4. Feedback – What went well in the project? • General: • Good cross divisional approach • Good team members • Clear focus of training, good support from Leonardo Office • Improvement of language/communication skills • Interesting topics • Ideal to get new contacts in the group • Good motivation to be in the programme • Project: • Support and openness of plants visited • Good teams of Leonardo participants

  5. Feedback – What did not work well? • General: • Bad preparation of presentations (SIP) • SIP, MAC and HR not focused (no clear scope for LeoVation) • Not sufficient top-management back-up • Training from Malik Team had no relation to tasks • No responsibilities (sanctions?) • Project: • Tasks were not defined well, did not make sense actually • MAC coordination weak, difficult to align timetables of participants • Not enough time to do proper work • No interest in achieved output - no feedback from plants

  6. Feedback – What was missing/necessary? • General: • Joint SIP strategy of how to implement Leonardo participants • Clear focus on what has to be jointly achieved • Close support and monitoring from Mondi Management • Project: • Commitment from the side of MAC (not training but occupation) • Joint definition of targets and strategy • Focus on the usability of the output • Open discussions about progress and problems • More communication and less arrogance on both sides • Clear definition of deadlines (deliverables were submitted too late)

  7. Feedback – Suggestions for improvement • General: • Train high-potentials by high-potentials • Defined responsibilities and expectations (from all sides) • More focus to allow self-motivation of participants • Performance of Leonardo participants should be more appreciated • Give participants more time to care for training/projects • Project: • Assign team leader that has authority • Clear communication/meeting/deliverables plan • More and better preparation • Better integration of teams into visited/receiving organisation

More Related