260 likes | 372 Views
University of Hawai‘i INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH OFFICE. MAPS Reports. 1633 Bachman Pl., SA2-4 g Honolulu, HI 96822 (808) 956-7532 http://www.hawaii.edu/iro. M A P S. anagement nd lanning upport. TABLE 3 UH Manoa Comparisons with Institutional Members of the
E N D
University of Hawai‘iINSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH OFFICE MAPS Reports 1633 Bachman Pl., SA2-4 gHonolulu, HI 96822 (808) 956-7532 http://www.hawaii.edu/iro
M A P S anagement nd lanning upport
TABLE 3 UH Manoa Comparisons with Institutional Members of the Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE) SIX-YEAR GRADUATION RATES OF FIRST-TIME FRESHMEN FALL 1990 TO FALL 1993 COHORTS GRADUATION AND RETENTION RATES PEER AND BENCHMARK GROUP COMPARISONS UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT M}NOA FALL 1990 to FALL 1998, as of 1999 This report summarizes data provided through the Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE) and compares graduation and retention rates at the University of Hawai‘i at M~noa with rates at its peer and benchmark institutions, and consortium institutions. It is coordinated by the Center for Institutional Data Exchange and Analysis (C-IDEA) at the College of Continuing Education, University of Oklahoma. Consortium members provide graduation and retention rates, which entitles them to an annual report which can be used as a reference guide for benchmarking. Each consortium member is also entitled to an individualized report consisting of self-identified peers. Using data from CSRDE, this report looks at three rates CSRDE: ! Retention/Continuation Rate: The percentage of first-time freshmen in a given Fall semester who returned to the institution in a subsequent fall semester. ! Graduation Rate: The cumulative percentage of first-time freshmen in a given Fall semester who graduated within a designated period of time, measured as of the summer term. ! Success Rate: The percentage of first-time freshmen in a given Fall semester who have either graduated or are still enrolled. The success rate is calculated by adding the graduation and retention rates together. Using these three rates, the University of Hawai‘i at M~noa is compared with its benchmark and peer group institutions, and against the 294 CSRDE member institutions who provided data for the 1999-2000 CSRDE report. Appendix 1 shows which schools are included in M~noa’s peer and benchmark groups, as well as graduation, retention, and success rate data for their Fall 1993 cohort. All data in this report exclude two peer groups institutions, Oregon State University and the University of Utah, which are not CSRDE members. Due to differing methodologies and databases, the data reported here differ from previously reported data from the NCHEMS/University of Hawai‘i Longitudinal Database Project. GRADUATION AND RETENTION RATES PEER AND BENCHMARK GROUP COMPARISONS UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT M}NOA FALL 1990 TO FALL 1998 COHORTS as of 1999 Institutional Research Office University of Hawai‘i November 2000 File Reference: Management and Planning Support Folder, Students 1/ Control totals reflect on 1992 -1998 cohorts; 1990 and 1991 cohort data not available. 2/ Caution should be used in comparing these percentages. UH Manoa reports "Mixed" category which is not used by other institutions. 3/ Retention and graduation rate data for UH Manoa are not reliable due to small cohort size, so are not being provided. Note: Selectivity is defined by average composite SAT scores, as shown in the table. Sources: "1998-99 CSRDE Report: Retention & Graduation Rates of 1990-97 Entering Freshman Cohorts in 269 U.S. Colleges and Universities," May 1999; "1999-00 CSRDE Report: Retention & Graduation Rates of 1992-98 Entering Freshmen Cohorts in 294 Colleges and Universities," May, 2000. Reports available online at: http://www.hawaii.edu/iro/maps.htm
Academic Crossover • Courses • Curriculum • Enrollment • Faculty/Staff • Finances • Planning • Projections • Students
APPLICATIONS PROCESSED UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I DEGREES AND CERTIFICATES EARNED FALL 2000 UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I, COMMUNITY COLLEGES FISCAL YEAR 1999-00 Institutional Research Office University of Hawai ‘i February 2001 Institutional Research Office University of Hawai ‘i October 2000 File Reference: Management and Planning Support Folder, Students File Reference: Management and Planning Support Folder, Students Reports available online at: http://www. hawaii . edu / iro /maps. htm Reports available online at: http://www. hawaii . edu / iro /maps. htm
FALL ENROLLMENT REPORT SPRING ENROLLMENT REPORT SUMMER ENROLLMENT REPORT UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I FALL 2000 SPRING 2001 SUMMER 2001 Institutional Research Office University of Hawai ‘i Institutional Research Office Institutional Research Office February 2001 University of University of Hawai Hawai ‘i ‘i May 2001 February 2002 File Reference: Management and Planning Support Folder, Students File Reference: Management and Planning Support Folder, Students File Reference: Management and Planning Support Folder, Students Reports available online at: http://www. hawaii . edu / iro /maps. htm Reports available online at: http://www. Reports available online at: http://www. hawaii hawaii . . edu edu / / iro iro /maps. /maps. htm htm
Student Registration Systems • Department of Education • Private High Schools • Student and Course Data • UH Office of Human Resources • UH Central Accounting • Federal and State Sources • - IPEDS • - DBED&T
U U
TABLE 3 UH Manoa Comparisons with Institutional Members of the Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE) SIX-YEAR GRADUATION RATES OF FIRST-TIME FRESHMEN FALL 1990 TO FALL 1993 COHORTS GRADUATION AND RETENTION RATES PEER AND BENCHMARK GROUP COMPARISONS UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT M}NOA FALL 1990 to FALL 1998, as of 1999 This report summarizes data provided through the Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE) and compares graduation and retention rates at the University of Hawai‘i at M~noa with rates at its peer and benchmark institutions, and consortium institutions. It is coordinated by the Center for Institutional Data Exchange and Analysis (C-IDEA) at the College of Continuing Education, University of Oklahoma. Consortium members provide graduation and retention rates, which entitles them to an annual report which can be used as a reference guide for benchmarking. Each consortium member is also entitled to an individualized report consisting of self-identified peers. Using data from CSRDE, this report looks at three rates CSRDE: ! Retention/Continuation Rate: The percentage of first-time freshmen in a given Fall semester who returned to the institution in a subsequent fall semester. ! Graduation Rate: The cumulative percentage of first-time freshmen in a given Fall semester who graduated within a designated period of time, measured as of the summer term. ! Success Rate: The percentage of first-time freshmen in a given Fall semester who have either graduated or are still enrolled. The success rate is calculated by adding the graduation and retention rates together. Using these three rates, the University of Hawai‘i at M~noa is compared with its benchmark and peer group institutions, and against the 294 CSRDE member institutions who provided data for the 1999-2000 CSRDE report. Appendix 1 shows which schools are included in M~noa’s peer and benchmark groups, as well as graduation, retention, and success rate data for their Fall 1993 cohort. All data in this report exclude two peer groups institutions, Oregon State University and the University of Utah, which are not CSRDE members. Due to differing methodologies and databases, the data reported here differ from previously reported data from the NCHEMS/University of Hawai‘i Longitudinal Database Project. GRADUATION AND RETENTION RATES PEER AND BENCHMARK GROUP COMPARISONS UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT M}NOA FALL 1990 TO FALL 1998 COHORTS as of 1999 Institutional Research Office University of Hawai‘i November 2000 File Reference: Management and Planning Support Folder, Students 1/ Control totals reflect on 1992 -1998 cohorts; 1990 and 1991 cohort data not available. 2/ Caution should be used in comparing these percentages. UH Manoa reports "Mixed" category which is not used by other institutions. 3/ Retention and graduation rate data for UH Manoa are not reliable due to small cohort size, so are not being provided. Note: Selectivity is defined by average composite SAT scores, as shown in the table. Sources: "1998-99 CSRDE Report: Retention & Graduation Rates of 1990-97 Entering Freshman Cohorts in 269 U.S. Colleges and Universities," May 1999; "1999-00 CSRDE Report: Retention & Graduation Rates of 1992-98 Entering Freshmen Cohorts in 294 Colleges and Universities," May, 2000. Reports available online at: http://www.hawaii.edu/iro/maps.htm
Provosts Chancellors University Community Registrars Librarians Students Faculty Other Administrators Directors Deans
www.hawaii.edu/iro/ • www.hawaii.edu/iro/ • Hamilton Library(Hawaiian Collection) • Institutional Research Office Sinclair Annex 2, Room 4 Phone: 956-7532 Fax: 956-9870
Grant proposals Presentation visuals Program review Self study Accreditation
1987 1991 2001 1999
TABLE 3 TABLE 3 UH Manoa Comparisons with Institutional Members of the UH Manoa Comparisons with Institutional Members of the Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE) Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE) SIX SIX - - YEAR GRADUATION RATES OF FIRST YEAR GRADUATION RATES OF FIRST - - TIME FRESHMEN TIME FRESHMEN FALL 1990 TO FALL 1993 COHORTS FALL 1990 TO FALL 1993 COHORTS CSRDE Institutions by Selectivity (1998) CSRDE Institutions by Selectivity (1998) CSRDE Institutions by Selectivity (1998) UH UH UH HIGHLY HIGHLY HIGHLY MODERATELY MODERATELY MODERATELY LESS LESS LESS ALL ALL ALL MANOA MANOA MANOA SELECTIVE SELECTIVE SELECTIVE SELECTIVE SELECTIVE SELECTIVE SELECTIVE SELECTIVE SELECTIVE SELECTIVE SELECTIVE SELECTIVE INSTITUTIONS INSTITUTIONS INSTITUTIONS Avg 6-yr graduation rates Avg 6-yr graduation rates Avg 6-yr graduation rates 54.7% 54.7% 54.7% 67.1% 67.1% 67.1% 53.4% 53.4% 53.4% 43.4% 43.4% 43.4% 35.7% 35.7% 35.7% 54.3% 54.3% 54.3% Control 1/ Control 1/ Control 1/ Public Public Public 54.7% 54.7% 54.7% 66.9% 66.9% 66.9% 53.3% 53.3% 53.3% 43.5% 43.5% 43.5% 34.7% 34.7% 34.7% 54.4% 54.4% 54.4% Private Private Private 68.8% 68.8% 68.8% 55.7% 55.7% 55.7% 56.8% 56.8% 56.8% 43.1% 43.1% 43.1% 60.4% 60.4% 60.4% Gender Gender Gender Men Men Men 50.2% 50.2% 50.2% 64.3% 64.3% 64.3% 50.3% 50.3% 50.3% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 30.8% 30.8% 30.8% 51.4% 51.4% 51.4% Women Women Women 58.2% 58.2% 58.2% 69.9% 69.9% 69.9% 56.2% 56.2% 56.2% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 39.6% 39.6% 39.6% 57.0% 57.0% 57.0% Ethnicity 2/ Ethnicity 2/ Ethnicity 2/ Asian Asian Asian 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% 72.1% 72.1% 72.1% 55.1% 55.1% 55.1% 43.7% 43.7% 43.7% 37.1% 37.1% 37.1% 60.4% 60.4% 60.4% Hispanic 3/ Hispanic 3/ Hispanic 3/ NA NA NA 58.3% 58.3% 58.3% 43.4% 43.4% 43.4% 33.8% 33.8% 33.8% 25.3% 25.3% 25.3% 41.1% 41.1% 41.1% Caucasian Caucasian Caucasian 41.6% 41.6% 41.6% 67.9% 67.9% 67.9% 55.5% 55.5% 55.5% 45.3% 45.3% 45.3% 39.6% 39.6% 39.6% 56.4% 56.4% 56.4% African American 3/ African American 3/ African American 3/ NA NA NA 51.5% 51.5% 51.5% 38.1% 38.1% 38.1% 34.1% 34.1% 34.1% 26.8% 26.8% 26.8% 38.4% 38.4% 38.4% Am Ind/Alask Nat 3/ Am Ind/Alask Nat 3/ Am Ind/Alask Nat 3/ NA NA NA 46.1% 46.1% 46.1% 28.5% 28.5% 28.5% 23.1% 23.1% 23.1% 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% 33.2% 33.2% 33.2% Non-Resident Alien Non-Resident Alien Non-Resident Alien 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 69.5% 69.5% 69.5% 55.4% 55.4% 55.4% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 32.1% 32.1% 32.1% 54.7% 54.7% 54.7% Mixed Mixed Mixed 49.6% 49.6% 49.6% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Number of institutions Number of institutions Number of institutions 78 78 78 70 70 70 75 75 75 71 71 71 294 294 294 Public Public Public 59 59 59 48 48 48 64 64 64 59 59 59 230 230 230 Private Private Private 19 19 19 22 22 22 11 11 11 12 12 12 64 64 64 Avg Composite SAT (1998 Avg Composite SAT (1998 Avg Composite SAT (1998 1101 1101 1101 above 1100 above 1100 above 1100 1045-1100 1045-1100 1045-1100 990-1044 990-1044 990-1044 below 990 below 990 below 990 1096 1096 1096 cohort) cohort) cohort) 1/ Control totals reflect on 1992 1/ Control totals reflect on 1992 - - 1998 cohorts; 1990 and 1991 cohort data not available. 1998 cohorts; 1990 and 1991 cohort data not available. 2/ Caution should be used in comparing these percentages. UH M 2/ Caution should be used in comparing these percentages. UH M anoa reports "Mixed" category which is not used by other anoa reports "Mixed" category which is not used by other institutions. institutions. 3/ Retention and graduation rate data for UH Manoa are not reli 3/ Retention and graduation rate data for UH Manoa are not reli able due to small cohort size, so are not being provided. able due to small cohort size, so are not being provided. Note: Selectivity is defined by average composite SAT scores, a Note: Selectivity is defined by average composite SAT scores, a s shown in the table. s shown in the table. Sources: "1998 Sources: "1998 - - 99 CSRDE Report: Retention & Graduation Rates of 1990 99 CSRDE Report: Retention & Graduation Rates of 1990 - - 97 Entering Freshman Cohorts in 269 U.S. Colleges and 97 Entering Freshman Cohorts in 269 U.S. Colleges and Universities," May 1999; "1999 Universities," May 1999; "1999 - - 00 CSRDE Report: Retention & Graduation Rates of 1992 00 CSRDE Report: Retention & Graduation Rates of 1992 - - 98 Entering Freshmen Cohorts in 294 98 Entering Freshmen Cohorts in 294 Colleges and Universities," May, 2000. Colleges and Universities," May, 2000. UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MANOA Figure 3 6-Year Graduation, Persistence & Drop-Out Rates 6-Year Graduation Rate 6-Year Graduation Rate 58.0% 54.0% Still Enrolled 10.0% Still Enrolled Dropped Out 10.9% Dropped Out 31.1% 36.0% Fall 1993 Cohort Fall 1987 Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate 54.7% Still Enrolled 10.6% Dropped Out 34.7% Fall 1990-Fall 1993 Average
Institutional Research Office 1633 Bachman Place Sinclair Annex 2, Room 4 Honolulu, HI 96822 Phone: (808) 956-7532 Fax: (808) 956-9870 www.hawaii.edu/iro/
IRO Data Man Institutional Research Office www.hawaii.edu/iro/