290 likes | 531 Views
EWGLAM / COST-717 Joint Session. Use of radar data in modelling at the Met Office (UK). Bruce Macpherson Mesoscale Assimilation, NWP Met Office. Outline. Radar data for assimilation into: atmospheric models land surface models Radar data for NWP model verification
E N D
EWGLAM / COST-717 Joint Session Use of radar data in modelling at the Met Office (UK) Bruce Macpherson Mesoscale Assimilation, NWP Met Office
Outline • Radar data for assimilation into: • atmospheric models • land surface models • Radar data for NWP model verification • Radar data for model validation
Rainfall Assimilation at the Met Office • 1996 - Operational assimilation of 3-hourly rain rates from UK weather radar network into Mesoscale Model • 1997 - NWP forecast impact studies on radar data • 1997 - test assimilations of lightning data as proxy rainfall • 1998 - Assimilation of hourly radar data • 2000 - Radar Quality Estimate used in assimilation • 2001/2 - French & German radars added to UK composite • 2003 - Retuning for ‘New Dynamics’ model version
Radar Data Impacts - objective scores (v radar analyses) Period 1 - significant benefit up to t+6/12 Period 2 - neutral signal
Radar Data Impacts - subjective OPER t+15 NO radar assimilation t+15
Radar Data Impacts: hourly v 3-hourly data 3-hourly radar data Hourly radar data T+3 T+3
Radar Data Impacts: hourly v 3-hourly data 3-hourly hourly
Relativeimportance of radar assimilation for short-period rain forecasts No of Cases showing benefit Light rain aircraft Radar & satellite sonde surface Heavy rain
Mesoscale Model Rainfall Assimilation • Data: hourly surface rain rates, pure radar -no gauge/satellite • QC & processing (with help from NWP): • clutter & anaprop removal -- bright band correction • range correction -- orographic enhancement • weekly radar calibration v gauge Monthly Totals Raw radar Corrected radar
Mesoscale Model Rainfall Assimilation (II) • Averaging: 5km raw data ==> 15km (model ~12km) • Assimilation: latent heat nudging (LHN) • target rainfall analysis Ran = (Rmod + W Robs) / (1+W) • Robsinterpolated from hourly values to model timestep • assimilation increments ( T) filtered on scale 2x
Land Surface Assimilation • For agricultural and hydrological products, soil moisture input to mesoscale model • Current system: “MORECS” • rainfall data ~150 daily gauges over UK • weekly analysis on 40km grid • interpolated variable is % of average annual rainfall • New system: “Soil State Diagnosis Model (SSDM)” • rainfall data: Nimrod radar analysis • hourly analysis on 5km grid (same as SSDM)
UK Mes soil moisture MORECS Nimrod SSDM Radar artefacts Relax to climatology
Radar wind assimilation VAD profile availability (CWINDE project) • operational since 2001 • monthly monitoring • quarterly quality reports
Radar data to verify NWP rainfall forecasts • on monthly timescale, gauges and ‘corrected’ radar tell roughly same overall story v radar Model skill v gauge Month ==>
Global Model precipitation verification over U.K • Models • 6 models, mostly 09/2000-10/2002 • 12Z runs up to 72h • 24h accumulation • up-/down-scaled to 96*96 km2 by box averaging • Observations • corrected radar data • upscaled to 96*96 km2 by box averaging
Global Model precipitation verification over U.K., 0-24h forecasts Frequency bias
LAM verification v UK radar Work in progress for: • UK Mesoscale • DWD LM • Hirlam reference • …any more?
For short NWP trials and batches of case studies, radar provides • better spatial sampling than gauges • clearer link with forecaster’s subjective assessment v radar
…..radar may allow study of model behaviour withhigher resolution in time • Mesoscale Model trial verification Frequency bias for hourly totals > 0.17mm (v Nimrod radar)
and maps of verification v radar can begin to show land/sea differences Rain/no-rain (>0.4 mm/6hrs)Frequency biast+12-18 hr forecastsautumn 2000 v radar
Observations of Evaporation 94GHz Radar-Derived Ice Water Content (below 0ºC) Radar data provided by Robin Hogan (Reading Univ.) and RCRU (RAL) 02 Apr 2000 11 Dec 1999
Model/Obs Comparison Average ice evaporative depth scale from the Chilbolton 94 GHz cloud radar and the operational UM for 20 separate days in Oct, Nov, Dec 1999.
FASTEX IOP 16: Validation Comparison of the reference and modified model ice evaporative depth scales with 94GHz radar observation statistics Average depth scale Reference:1260 m Modified: 780 m Obs: 640 m (=160m) Modified model = higher vertical resolution, double ice evaporation rate and two thirds of ice fall speed
Impact of including rain advection on rainfall distribution. Rainfall rate difference (advection-no advection) Rainfall rate (mm/hr) Orography (m) 10hr model forecast.
VerificationDartmoor River Catchment Rainfall 3 Hour Accumulations Exe Teign Dart Tamar Avon & Erme No Rain Advection With Rain Advection Radar 2km Model Forecasts
VerificationCorrelation between model surface rainfall and NIMROD radar-derived surface rainfall for Dartmoor No Rain Advection With Rain Advection
Future Plans • Limited area 4D-Var operational 2005 • with radar derived surface rainfall data in 2006 • Experimental 4D-Var assimilation of radar radial winds • project with Salford University • Partial Dopplerisation of UK radar network • 7 radars by 2006 • Convective scale model by 2008 • develop radar verification techniques • establish viable radar assimilation method