1 / 19

Enhanced Correspondence and Statistics for Structural Shape Analysis: Current Research

Enhanced Correspondence and Statistics for Structural Shape Analysis: Current Research. Martin Styner Department of Computer Science and Psychiatry. Concept: Shape Analysis. Traditional analysis: Regional volume Our view: Analysis of local shape. Volumetric analysis: Size, Growth.

kiri
Download Presentation

Enhanced Correspondence and Statistics for Structural Shape Analysis: Current Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Enhanced Correspondence and Statistics for Structural Shape Analysis: Current Research Martin Styner Department of Computer Science and Psychiatry

  2. Concept: Shape Analysis • Traditional analysis: Regional volume • Our view: Analysis of local shape Volumetric analysis: Size, Growth Statistical analysis Shape Representation Binary Segmentation

  3. Geometric Correspondence • Template/Model fit • Fit a model to the data, model bias • m-rep, deformation fields • Pair-wise optimization • Template/Model bias • Many PDM based analysis methods • Object inherent • No bias, fully independent • SPHARM • Population-wise optimization • No template, population vs. single object • MDL, DetCovar

  4. SPHARM: Spherical Harmonics • Surface & Parameterization • Fit coefficients of parameterized basis functions to surface • Sample parameterization and reconstruct object • Hierarchical description 1 3 6 10

  5. Surface SPHARM Parametrization Correspondence: SPHARM • Correspondence by same parameterization • Area ratio preserving through optimization • Location of meridian and equator ill-defined • Poles and Axis of first order ellipsoid • Object specific, independent, good initial correspondence

  6. Parameterization based Correspondence • SPHARM • Can also be used as initialization of other methods • Optimization of spherical parametrization • Optimize over (,), evaluate on surface • Template matching • Surface geometry: Curvature + Location • Meier, Medical Image Analysis 02 • Population based: • Optimization of location/coordinate distribution • Davies, TMI 02 • Our current research (Ipek Oguz) • Fusion with SPHARM and surface geometry, fusion of all 3 methods

  7. Population Based – Davies • Optimization using parameterization • Initialization with SPHARM parameterization

  8. Population Based • Population Criterions: MDL & DetCov • MDL = Minimum Description Length • In terms of shape modeling: Cost of transmitting the coded point location model (in number of bits) • DetCov = log determinant of covariance matrix • Compactness of model • Criterions very similar • MDL expensive computation

  9. Correspondence Evaluation • How can we evaluate correspondence? • Comparison to manual landmarks • Selection variability quite large • Experts disagree on landmark placement • Correspondence quality measurements • Best metric for evaluation => best metric for correspondence definition • Evaluation in Styner et al, IPMI 2003 • Widely cited • Shows need for evaluation and validation • 2 structures: Lateral ventricle, Femoral head Styner, Rajamani, Nolte, Zsemlye, Szekely, Taylor, Davies: Evaluation of 3D Correspondence Methods for Model Building, IPMI 2003, p 63-75

  10. Correspondence Evaluation • Evaluation based on derived shape space • Principal Component Analysis (PCA) model • Generalization • Does the model describe new cases well? • Leave-one-out tests (Jack-knife) • Select a case, remove from training, build model • Check approximation error of removed case • Specificity • Does the model only represent valid objects? • Create new objects in shape space with Gaussian sampling • Approximation error to closest sample in training set

  11. Correspondence Evaluation M: number of modes in model MDL and DetCov are performing the best MDL has strong statistical bias for shape analysis For shape analysis: optimization and analysis on same features Femur Lateral Ventricle Styner, Rajamani, Nolte, Zsemlye, Szekely, Taylor, Davies: Evaluation of 3D Correspondence Methods for Model Building, IPMI 2003, p 63-75

  12. Population Based Curvature • Current project in correspondence • Population based  better modeling • Surface Geometry  no statistical bias • Use of SPHARM  efficiency, noise stability • Curvature • Shape Index S and Curvedness C • SPHARM derivatives SPHARM first derivatives

  13. Statistical Analysis • Surfaces with • Correspondence • Pose normalized • Analyze shape feature • Features per surface point • Univariate • Distance to template • Template bias • Thickness • Multivariate • Point locations (x,y,z) • m-rep parameters • Spherical wavelets

  14. Hypothesis Testing • At each location: Hypothesis test • P-value of group mean difference • Schizophrenia group vs Control group • Significance map • Threshold α = 5%, 1%, 0.1% • Parametric: Model of distribution (Gaussian) • Non-parametric: model free • P-value directly from observed distribution • Distribution estimation via permutation tests

  15. Many, Many, Too Many… • Many local features computed independently • 1000 - 5000 features • Even if features are pure noise, still many locations are significant • Overly optimistic  Raw p-values • Multiple comparison problem • P-value correction • False-Positive Error control • False Detection Rate • General Linear Mixed Modeling • Model covariance structure • Dimensionality reduction • Work with Biostatistics • MICCAI 2003, M-rep

  16. Correction P-value Correction • Corrected significance map • As if only one test performed • Bonferroni correction • Global, simple, very pessimistic • pcorr = p/n = 0.05/1000 = 0.00005 • Non-parametric permutation tests • Minimum statistic of raw p-values • Global, still pessimistic Pantazis, Leahy, Nichols, Styner: Statistical Surface Based Morphometry Using a Non-Parametric Approach, ISBI 2004,1283-1286 Styner, Gerig: Correction scheme for multiple correlated statistical tests in local shape analysis, SPIE Medical Imaging 2004, p. 233-240,2004

  17. Ongoing Research • False Detection Rate (FDR): more relaxed, fMRI, VBM • Currently being added to software • Program design: Software not based on ITK statistics framework • Next: • Covariates: No account of covariates • Age, Medication, Gender • General Linear Model, per feature at each location • multivariate analysis of fitted parameters

  18. The End • Questions?

  19. S0 Permutation Hypothesis Tests • Estimate distribution • Permute group labels • Na , Nb in Group A and B • Create M permutations • Compute feature Sj for each perm • Histogram  Distribution • p-value: #Perms larger / #Perms total Sj # perm Sj

More Related