1 / 21

Climate variability and change for China: Preparing for the next 30 years

Explore uncertainties in projecting future monsoon rainfall extremes over China and India. Analyzing HadCM3 vs. CMIP3 archives to predict intensity changes in extreme events.

kirksey
Download Presentation

Climate variability and change for China: Preparing for the next 30 years

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Climate variability and change for China: Preparing for the next 30 years Uncertainties in 2xCO2 coupled GCM projections of future monsoon rainfall extremes Andrew Turner & Julia Slingo

  2. Introduction

  3. Active-break events on subseasonal timescales represent the largest variations of the Indian summer monsoon. 2002 2007 Introduction • Little is known about what will happen to extreme rainfall events in monsoon regions.

  4. Outline • Introduction • Model set-up • Changes to rainfall extremes in HadCM3 • Comparison with the CMIP3 archive • Can we predict changes to the intensity of the most extreme events over monsoon regions? • HadCM3 vs. CMIP3 archive for China and India • Summary

  5. Model set-up • Hadley Centre coupled model HadCM3: • Atmosphere 3.75 x 2.5 x 30 levels • Ocean 1.25 x 1.25 x 20 levels • 100-year pre-industrial control integration • 100-year (stable) 2xCO2 integration

  6. Mean precipitation / change (JJAS) CMAP IMD 1 data HadCM3 1xCO2 2xCO2 minus 1xCO2

  7. Rainfall distribution: model vs. obs. • Model has a tendency to drizzle (common with many convection schemes). • Cannot represent the upper tail correctly due to grid size. (each gridpoint) • Clear tendency for increased frequency of heavy events at 2xCO2, at the expense of moderate rainfall. • This trend is also noted in the IMD dataset1. 1B.N. Goswami, V. Venugopal, D. Sengupta, M.S. Madhusoodanan, P.K. Xavier (2006). Science314: 1442—1445.

  8. Changing probability of extremes • Levels of precipitation associated with 95th and 99th percentiles are assessed at 1xCO2. • The change in probability of attaining these levels at 2xCO2 is plotted. 95th 99th • Chance more than doubles over northern India, head of Bay of Bengal and central China. From A.G. Turner & J.M. Slingo (2008). Submitted, QJRMS.

  9. Changes in upper rainfall extremes • Precipitation 95th and 99th percentiles calculated at 1xCO2, 2xCO2 for each JJAS season, mean taken. 95th HadCM3 1xCO2 HadCM3 2xCO2 2xCO2 minus 1xCO2 99th • Extreme changes beyond mean changes, especially in northern India, south/central China and South/East China Seas. From A.G. Turner & J.M. Slingo (2008). Submitted, QJRMS.

  10. Uncertainty in spatial distribution of extremes change • Projections of changes to the local distribution of precipitation extremes are very uncertain across GCMs. • Patterns of extreme change are strongly linked to mean changes  difficult to devise local strategies to deal with extreme change when there is such uncertainty in current GCM output. • IPCC AR4: • “Wet extremes more severe in models where mean precipitation increases” (Meehl et al. 2007). • “Projections concerning extreme events in the tropics remain uncertain” (Christensen et al. 2007). • Extreme percentiles examined in CMIP3 database daily output (picntrl & 1pctto2x experiments).

  11. IPCC AR4 changes to mean rainfall intensity

  12. Uncertainty in spatial distribution of extremes change: the AR4 models • Changes in 99th percentiles calculated from daily data in CMIP3 database in the same way as for HadCM3. • Wide variation in spatial distribution of summer extreme changes amongst IPCC AR4 models.

  13. Uncertainty in spatial distribution of extremes change: the AR4 models – mean vs extreme

  14. Regional precipitation extreme changes • Upper extremes are assessed at each gridpoint (after Allen & Ingram1) on a regional basis. tropics India • Maximum precipitation intensity increases broadly inline with Clausius-Clapeyron and measured climate sensitivity. 1M.R. Allen, W.J. Ingram (2002). Nature419: 224—232.

  15. Regional precipitation extreme changes • Results for HadCM3 suggest remarkable predictability of maximum precipitation intensity based on purely thermodynamic arguments. • Allen & Ingram (2002) argued that tropics/monsoon regions could undergo larger increases due to feedbacks between latent heating and the large-scale flow. However HadCM3 undergoes no significant change in the Somali Jet at 2xCO2 (Turner et al. 20072). 2A.G. Turner, P.M. Inness, J.M. Slingo (2007). QJRMS133: 1143—1157.

  16. Regional precipitation extreme changes • Upper percentile changes for monsoon regions assessed in daily data from the CMIP3 archive. • India (65–90E, 10–30N) & China (95–120E, 20–45N) in all models with daily data available. • Typical data input (for JJA and whole year): • 40yrs picntrl • 20yrs 1pctto2x at time of CO2 doubling (red) • 20yrs 1pctto2x from end of integration (blue, some models) • Surface air temperature used to measure climate sensitivity.

  17. IPCC AR4 upper percentile intensity change (China)

  18. IPCC AR4 upper percentile intensity change (China JJA)

  19. Summary • For HadCM3: • Subseasonal extremes of precipitation increase beyond changes in the mean, and contribute a greater proportion of the seasonal rainfall total. • Maximum precipitation intensity for tropics and monsoon regions seem to increase based on the rate of atmospheric warming and thermodynamic arguments. • Compared with the CMIP3 archive: • Patterns of wet extreme change in monsoon regions follow quite closely changes in the mean • Some models show thermodynamic extreme repsonse. • Others have a strong dynamic component.

  20. Uncertainties to resolve • We can’t say anything about local changes to extremes (needed to assess impacts of flooding on infrastructure, crop damage etc) until we have more convergence in patterns of mean change. • Need to understand dynamic vs. thermodynamic responses of extremes to climate warming, as well as any seasonally dependent response.

  21. Thank you! a.g.turner@reading.ac.uk http://www.met.rdg.ac.uk/~sws05agt

More Related