160 likes | 176 Views
Learn about the evolution, goals, challenges, and roll-out of the CSUconnect Federation for secure, scalable access to system-wide resources, utilizing existing infrastructure and campus initiatives. Discover lessons learned and key responsibilities for the Chancellor’s Office and campuses.
E N D
California State University CSUconnect Federation Presentation for InCommon August 19, 2009
Overview About the CSU • Campuses • Nation’s largest 4-year public university system • 23 campuses and 7 off-campus centers • 437,000 students (Fall 2008) • 47,000 faculty and staff • More than 1,800 bachelor’s and master’s degree programs in 357 subject areas • Chancellor’s Office • Administrative Headquarters • 700 Staff
History IAM Primordial Soup • ITAC Workshop on Middleware (April 2002) • ITAC Middleware Steering Committee (May 2002) • Directories Working Group (Spring 2002) • Adoption of eduPerson Object Classification • Creation of calstatePerson Object Classification • SIMI Proposal Approved by TSC (May 2003) • Initial SIMI Workshop (July 2004) • Technical Architecture Group formed (September 2006) • Technical Representation from all 23 Campuses • IAM CIO Steering Committee formed (September2006) • Subcommittee of ITAC
The New Recipe Evolution Without Revolution • Deliver on key drivers • Access to system-wide resources • Provide foundation for realizing local benefits • Provide cost effective, scalable approach • Affordable system-wide software licensing • Avoid forklift upgrades and take advantage of existing campus resources
The New Recipe Federation Goals • Security and scalability • Limit centralized maintenance overhead • Rely on local identity data authorities • Enable access to services • Electronic library resources • Collaboration between higher-education institutions and partners • Collaboration between campuses • System-wide applications
CSUconnect Federation Why CSUconnect • Flexibility • CSU-Specific requirements • Internal services and resources • Central administration • Consistency • Knowledge and resource sharing • Coordination and adoption
CSUconnect Federation Why InCommon • Low cost, low maintenance • Use of existing non-CSU infrastructure • Existing relationships • User driven community
CSUconnect Federation Signs of Intelligent Life • Proof of concept with Moss Landing Marine Labs (January 2007) • CSUconnect Federation Standards document completed and approved by ITAC (April 2007) • Technical system-wide design completed (August 2007) • Phased roll-out plan constructed (March 2008)
CSUconnect Federation Chancellor’s Office Responsibilities • On-going coordination and leadership of IAM program system-wide • Administrative management and oversight • Shared system-wide infrastructure • Discovery Service (WAYF) • Provide training • Provide bulk of funding
CSUconnect Federation Campus Responsibilities • Identification and commitment of local staffing resources • Administrative paperwork • InCommon • CSUconnect • Completion of campus infrastructure • Enterprise Directory • Shibboleth Identity Provider (IdP) • calstateEduPerson • On-going coordination and leadership of IAM initiatives at campus level
CSUconnect Federation Roll-out • Project Plan • Three implementation phases (~ 33% campus each) • Includes common administrative and technical processes • Campus training (began October 2008) • Costs covered by the Chancellor’s Office • Hardware distribution ($180,000 upfront) • InCommon setup fees ($16,000 upfront) • InCommon annual registration fees ($24,000) • Campuses cover proceeding years • First campus became member of CSUconnect Federation, February 2009. • Most campuses should be complete September 2009
CSUconnect Federation Roll-out, Continued • Initially targeting four major system-wide applications • SharePoint (System-wide Intranet) • Consolidated PeopleSoft Finance • Central Finance Data Warehouse • Wireless • Some campus specific targets • CSU Learning Management Systems • Google Mail • Microsoft Dreamspark • External Library providers
CSUconnect Federation Challenges • Budget • Competition for campus staff resources with other projects • Varying levels of technical expertise between campuses • Multiple group involvement on larger campuses • Coordinating the participation of campuses • Ongoing communication and project management with campuses to ensure work is completed
CSUconnect Federation Lessons Learned • Don’t wait • If you think it’s important, start now! • Define the systemic benefits early on • CIO’s must lead, but must not focus on the technology • This is about doing our business in a different way
Questions Q & A For further information: Mark Crase Carol Kiliany Michael Trullinger mcrase@calstate.educkiliany@calstate.edumtrullinger@calstate.edu